Group-covariant extreme and quasi-extreme channels Laleh Memarzadeh1and Barry C. Sanders2y 1Department of Physics Sharif University of Technology Tehran 11365-9161 Iran

2025-05-06 0 0 827.14KB 33 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Group-covariant extreme and quasi-extreme channels
Laleh Memarzadeh1, and Barry C. Sanders2,
1Department of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11365-9161, Iran
2Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
(Dated: October 10, 2022)
Constructing all extreme instances of the set of completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP)
maps, i.e., quantum channels, is a challenging and valuable open problem in quantum information
theory. Here we introduce a systematic approach that despite the lack of knowledge about the
full parametrization of the set of CPTP maps on arbitrary Hilbert-spaced dimension, enables us to
construct exactly those extreme channels that are covariant with respect to a finite discrete group or
a compact connected Lie group. Innovative labeling of quantum channels by group representations
enables us to identify the subset of group-covariant channels whose elements are group-covariant
generalized-extreme channels. Furthermore, we exploit essentials of group representation theory to
introduce equivalence classes for the labels and also partition the set of group-covariant channels.
As a result we show that it is enough to construct one representative of each partition. We construct
Kraus operators for group-covariant generalized-extreme channels by solving systems of linear and
quadratic equations for all candidates satisfying the necessary condition for being group-covariant
generalized-extreme channels. Deciding whether these constructed instances are extreme or quasi-
extreme is accomplished by solving system of linear equations. Proper labeling and partitioning the
set of group-covariant channels leads to a novel systematic, algorithmic approach for constructing
the entire subset of group-covariant extreme channels. We formalize the problem of constructing and
classifying group-covariant generalized extreme channels, thereby yielding an algorithmic approach
to solving, which we express as pseudocode. To illustrate the application and value of our method, we
solve for explicit examples of group-covariant extreme channels. With unbounded computational re-
sources to execute our algorithm, our method always delivers a description of an extreme channel for
any finite-dimensional Hilbert-space and furthermore guarantees a description of a group-covariant
extreme channel for any dimension and for any finite-discrete or compact connected Lie group if
such an extreme channel exists.
memarzadeh@sharif.edu
sandersb@ucalgary.ca; http://iqst.ca/people/peoplepage.php?id=4
arXiv:2210.03449v1 [quant-ph] 7 Oct 2022
2
I. INTRODUCTION
Quantum channels, which are completely positive trace-preserving linear maps belonging to the set of linear maps
on Banach spaces of operators, represent the most general allowed form of quantum dynamics [1–3] and they form
a convex subset. Characterizing quantum channels is important for representing general dynamics and for modeling
decoherence in quantum systems [4]. Based on such characterizations, efficient simulation of quantum dynamics
becomes feasible. Another importance of characterizing the whole set of quantum channels is to describe general
quantum communication channels and to analyze rates of reliable classical and quantum information that can be
communicated through quantum channels [5, 6].
As full characterization of convex sets is feasible by just knowing the extreme points of a convex set, full channel
characterization can be accomplished by determining only the small subset comprising all extreme channels. The
conundrum is that extreme channels can be determined by knowing the convex set and vice versa. For quantum
channels acting on d-dimensional Hilbert-space, necessary and sufficient conditions for a channel to be extreme are
described in [7] using similar arguments to those presented in [8]. For qubit channels, full characterization of extreme
points is known [9–12]. On the other hand, for Hilbert-space dimension d > 2 (qubit channels), neither extreme
channels nor full characterizations of the set of quantum channels are known
Here we advance the understanding and characterization of extreme channels by treating channels restricted by
symmetries, which are specified by finite discrete or compact connected Lie groups. Compactness ensures that the
connected Lie group has finite-dimensional representations. We exploit this symmetry to construct exact forms of
extreme channels. Specifically, for any d, we develop an algorithmic approach to derive exactly a subset of extreme
points of the set of channels that have certain specified symmetries.
Only special types of channels have been fully characterized to date: a set of qubit channels including all extreme
points [9–12] and some extreme points for the set of unital channels [13, 14], which are quantum counterparts of
classical bistochastic processes. Studying unital channels is useful for investigating similarities between classical
and quantum processes, such as establishing a quantum version of Birkhoff’s Theorem [13] and proving additivity
or superadditivity of quantities relevant to the communication capacity of channels [15–17]. Fully characterizing
quantum channels is quite challenging, which necessitates tackling restricted cases such as unitality.
Characterizing quantum channels has an important practical application to quantum simulation [18–20]. Quantum
simulation is an important application of quantum computing and typically is studied for Hamiltonian-generated
unitary evolution [19, 21–25], but, as general evolution is described by quantum channels, a fully developed theory
of quantum simulation could be based on simulating quantum channels. Whereas Hamiltonian simulation exploits
notions such as the Solovay-Kitaev theorem [26, 27] for gate decomposition and sparseness of Hamiltonians [22, 23], di-
rect quantum simulation of channels is challenging. However some progress has been made by exploiting knowledge of
extreme channels. Decomposing the single-qubit channel has been explored theoretically [28] and experimentally [29]
and exploits properties of extreme channels. Extreme channels are valuable as well for qudit-channel decomposi-
tion [30], including for dimension-altering channels [31], and for decomposing m-qubit to n-qubit channels [32]. This
latter result [32] emphasizes the importance of their constructive approach to channel decomposition, which guarantees
success of the channel-decomposition procedure. Those authors contrast their constructive approach to the qudit-
channel decomposition approach [30], which is provably not guaranteed to succeed based on an insufficient number
of parameters. These theoretical [28, 31, 32] and experimental [29] advances point to the importance of determining
extreme channels to make quantum-channel simulation efficient or at least tractable.
Solving for extreme channels is currently restricted to particular examples of unital channels, whereas our goal is to
establish a systematic, algorithmic approach to constructing extreme channels that are group-covariant [33], whether
unital or not. Beginning with the name of a finite-discrete group or a compact connected Lie group and d, we exploit
the possibility of being able to look up all inequivalent irreducible representations (irreps) of the group in order to be
able to construct all possible inequivalent d-dimensional representations of the group by direct sums of inequivalent
group irreps. For any two d-dimensional inequivalent representations of the group and any inequivalent group irrep
with dimension less than or equal to d, we solve a set of linear equations, obtained by applying the group-covariance
constraint, to construct Kraus representations of corresponding group-covariant generalized extreme channels. Our
method exploits the full power of representation theory; if we employed the obvious brute-force approach instead,
we would be solving a set of linear equations for all pairs of d-dimensional representations and for all d2-dimensional
representations of the given group, which is an uncountably infinite number of candidates; instead, provided the
representation theory for the group is known, our approach yields only a finite number of candidates, making our
approach feasible algorithmically. Once we have identified these candidates, we then test if the obtained generalized
extreme channel satisfies the constraint for being extreme. This constraint is expressed as a system of linear equations
whose solution reveals whether the obtained generalized extreme channel is extreme or quasi-extreme.
Our systematic, algorithmic approach is described by a pseudocode that we define for this purpose. Typically,
pseudocode serves as a convenient way of representing the logical flow of a program for implementation on a standard,
3
i.e., Turing-like, computer, but our pseudocode is quite different: serving as a representation of the logical flow for
our mathematical approach. Thus, we make it clear that, formally, our pseudocode applies to a real-number model
of computing; this model enables us to be rigorous with respect to the logic of our systematic, algorithmic approach
to solving group-covariant extreme and quasi-extreme channels.
We begin by presenting a full background to our work in §II, including state of the art and methods, and then we
proceed to describe our approach in §III. Our results are presented and fully explained in §IV followed by a discussion
of these results in §V. Finally, we conclude in §VI including an outlook on outstanding problems and potential future
work.
II. BACKGROUND
In this section we summarize the pertinent literature and provide basic concepts required for subsequent sections.
We begin by discussing quantum channels in §II A, including their Kraus and Choi representations. §II B is devoted
to group-covariant channels and the constraints on the Kraus operators of group-covariant quantum channels.
A. Quantum channels
In this subsection first we review the definition of quantum channels. We then review Kraus representation and Choi
matrix representations for quantum channels. Following that, we recall the definition of specific subsets of quantum
channels, namely extreme channels, generalized-extreme channels, and quasi-extreme channels.
1. Channel representation
For Ha complex finite-dimensional Hilbert space and L(H) the space of linear operators acting on H, density
operators {ρ}are positive trace-class operators on H; i.e., they belong to the subset of L(H) denoted by
T(H) = {ρ∈ L(H)|ρ0,tr(ρ)=1}.(1)
For our purposes, the trace of the density operator is unity. A quantum channel is any completely positive trace-
preserving map Φ : T(H) T (H)
For Hrestricted to finite dimension d, i.e.,
d:= dim H,(2)
every quantum channel can be expressed as
Φ() =
K
X
k=1
AkA
k,•∈T(H), K d2.(3)
This expression is subject to the trace-preserving constraint
Ξ = 1(4)
for
Ξ :=
K
X
k=1
A
kAk,(5)
which can be non-diagonal. Here the nonzero linear operators Ak∈ L(H) are called Kraus operators with each Kraus
operator expressible as a d×dcomplex matrix whose entries are
(Ak)ij := hei|Ak|eji ∈ C, i + 1, j + 1 [d] := {1,2, . . . , d},(6)
for {|eii} an orthonormal basis of finite-dimensional H, where igoes from 0 to d1. In summary, Φ can be represented
by the set {Ak}k[K]with each Akcomprising d2complex-valued matrix elements. Therefore, the channel is described
by up to Kd2complex-valued parameters.
4
Remark 1.For d= 0, the only vector in Hilbert space is zero, which has zero norm. Hence there is no allowed state
in this case. For d= 1, only one normalized state exists, which forms the normal basis for the Hilbert space. Kraus
operators of this channel are proportional to the projector onto the basis of the space satisfying the trace-preserving
condition.
The set of Kraus operators describing a map Φ is unique up to an isometry [27]. For a given map Φ, the minimum
number of Kraus operators, called the Choi rank, equals the rank of the Choi operator
CΦ:= 1
d1) (|ΨihΨ|),|Ψi:= 1
d
d1
X
i=0 |ei, eii(7)
and
(CΦ)mn,pq =hem, en|CΦ|ep, eqi=1
dhem|Φ(|eniheq|)|epi(8)
is the Choi matrix. Typically, the operator (7) is called the Choi matrix, but, due to our algorithmic approach,
we need to be extra careful in distinguishing operators from their matrix representations and we denote matrices of
size m×nwith entries drawn from the field Fby Mm×n(F). Choi showed that a minimal set of Kraus operators can
be obtained from the eigenvectors of the Choi matrix with non-zero eigenvalus [8].
2. Extreme channels
The set of quantum channels SΦis convex and thus has extreme points.
Definition 1.Extreme points of the convex set SΦare called extreme channels. Extreme channels are channels that
cannot be written as a convex combination of any other two distinct channels in a non-trivial way.
We denote the set of extreme channels by SΦext SΦ. Despite the importance of extreme channels, characterization
of extreme channels is unknown except for the special case of d= 2 [9–11]. Results beyond d= 2 are restricted to
characterizing extreme points of the set of unital channels (Φ(1)1), which are not necessarily extreme points of
the set of all channels [13].
An important theorem on extreme channels specifies necessary and sufficient conditions for a channel to be an
extreme one [8]:
Theorem 1.A channel represented by a set of Kraus operators {Ak}k[K]is extreme if and only if (iff) the set of
operators
S:= {A
kAl}k,l[K](9)
is linearly independent [7, 8].
Thus, the number Kof Kraus operators of an extreme channel has upper bound
Kd. (10)
Therefore, the Choi rank of an extreme channel is bounded by d.
Clearly not all channels with Choi rank satisfying inequality (10) are extreme channels, but such channels are
interesting as well [11, 34]. The fact that other channels are interesting leads to defining two further important
subsets of quantum channels. One subset is known as generalized-extreme channels and the other subset is known as
quasi-extreme channels, which we now define.
Definition 2.Channels with Choi rank not exceeding dare called generalized-extreme channels [11] and the set of
generalized-extreme channels is denoted by SΦgen
Definition 3.Generalized-extreme channels that are not extreme are called quasi-extreme channels [11], and the set
of quasi-extreme channels is denoted by SΦqe
Remark 2.Extreme and quasiextreme channels are mutually exclusive: SΦgen SΦqe =.
5
B. Group-covariant channels
In this subsection, we elaborate on a specific class of channels, namely group-covariant channels. First we recall the
definition of equivalent channels. Based on this definition we explain that a group-covariant channel is a channel (3)
with the additional property that the channel’s action is invariant under pre- and post-unitary conjugations that
are described by group representations. Then we explain the constraints on the Kraus operators of group-covariant
channels and how two group-covariant channels under the same group, with respect to equivalent representations of
the group, are equivalent. Group-covariant channels have been studied in the context of channel capacity [35–39],
extreme points of unital channels [13], and channel characterization [40–42], and complementarity and additivity
properties of various covariant channels are discussed in [43].
Definition 4.A Channel Φ is unitarily equivalent to channel Φ0, denoted by Φ Φ0, if there exist d-dimensional
unitary operators Uand Vsuch that
ΦΦ0:Φ=TUΦ0◦ TV(11)
where denotes composition of maps and
TQ:L(H)→ L(H) : • 7→ QQ, Q ∈ L(H).(12)
The equivalence relation (11) partitions the set of all quantum channels for given Hilbert-space dimension dinto
equivalence classes of channels. Any quantum channel is equivalent to itself for U=V=1. However, for some
channels, each channel is equivalent to itself even if Uand Vare not identity operators. These channels, with
symmetric properties, are group-covariant channels defined as below.
Definition 5.For a finite discrete group or a compact connected Lie group denoted G, with a pair of unitary repre-
sentations [33]
D(1), D(2) ∈ L(H),(13)
a channel Φ is group-covariant with respect to representations D(1), D(2) if
TD(2)(g)Φ◦ TD(1)(g)= Φ g∈ G (14)
where TQis defined in Eq. (12).
Suppose channel Φ, represented by Kraus operators {Ak}k[K](3), is group-covariant with respect to two d-
dimensional unitary representations of the group G, namely, D(1) and D(2). Then Eq. (14) implies that
D(2)(g)AkD(1)(g) =
K
X
l=1
kl(g)Al,k[K],g∈ G,(15)
subject to the trace-preserving condition (4), for Ω a unitary representation of the group Gon any K-dimensional
unitary space [35], [40]. The dimension of Ω is equal to the number of Kraus operators describing the channel [40].
Remark 3.The group-covariant channel Φ (14) with respect to D(1) and D(2) is not necessarily unique and each
distinct Φ should be suitably labelled. The role of Ω (15) is to label distinct group-covariant channels with respect
to D(1) and D(2); i.e. we can write Φ.
Remark 4.If Ω is a reducible representation of the group, then the group-covariant channel with Kraus operators
satisfying Eq. (15) is a convex combination of other channels that are also group-covariant with respect to D(1)
and D(2) [40].
Remark 5.Let Φ (3) be group-covariant with respect to representations D(1) and D(2). Let D0(1) and D0(2) be two
representations of the same group. Suppose these two representations are respectively unitarily equivalent to D(1)
and D(2) so
UiD(i)(g)U
i=D0(i)(g),g∈ G,(16)
for {Ui}i[2] d-dimensional unitary operators. Then channel Φ0, described by Kraus operators {A0
k=U2AkU
1}k[K],
is group-covariant with respect to representations D0(i)s [40]
Φ0=TU2Φ◦ TU
1.(17)
That is according to Definition 4, these channels are unitarily equivalent.
摘要:

Group-covariantextremeandquasi-extremechannelsLalehMemarzadeh1,andBarryC.Sanders2,y1DepartmentofPhysics,SharifUniversityofTechnology,Tehran11365-9161,Iran2InstituteforQuantumScienceandTechnology,UniversityofCalgary,Calgary,AlbertaT2N1N4,Canada(Dated:October10,2022)Constructingallextremeinstancesoft...

展开>> 收起<<
Group-covariant extreme and quasi-extreme channels Laleh Memarzadeh1and Barry C. Sanders2y 1Department of Physics Sharif University of Technology Tehran 11365-9161 Iran.pdf

共33页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:33 页 大小:827.14KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-06

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 33
客服
关注