Non-Hermitian boundary spectral winding Zuxuan Ou1Yucheng Wang2 3 4and Linhu Li1 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Metrology and Sensing School of Physics and Astronomy

2025-05-02 0 0 8.06MB 10 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Non-Hermitian boundary spectral winding
Zuxuan Ou,1Yucheng Wang,2, 3, 4 and Linhu Li1,
1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Metrology and Sensing &School of Physics and Astronomy,
Sun Yat-Sen University (Zhuhai Campus), Zhuhai 519082, China
2Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering,
Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
3International Quantum Academy, Shenzhen 518048, China
4Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Science and Engineering,
Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
(Dated: October 25, 2022)
Spectral winding of complex eigenenergies represents a topological aspect unique in non-Hermitian systems,
which vanishes in one-dimensional (1D) systems under the open boundary conditions (OBC). In this work, we
discover a boundary spectral winding in two-dimensional non-Hermitian systems under the OBC, originating
from the interplay between Hermitian boundary localization and non-Hermitian non-reciprocal pumping. Such
a nontrivial boundary topology is demonstrated in a non-Hermitian breathing Kagome model with a triangle
geometry, whose 1D boundary mimics a 1D non-Hermitian system under the periodic boundary conditions with
nontrivial spectral winding. In a trapezoidal geometry, such a boundary spectral winding can even co-exist with
corner accumulation of edge states, instead of extended ones along 1D boundary of a triangle geometry. An
OBC type of hybrid skin-topological eect may also emerge in a trapezoidal geometry, provided the boundary
spectral winding completely vanishes. By studying the Green’s function, we unveil that the boundary spectral
winding can be detected from a topological response of the system to a local driving field, oering a realistic
method to extract the nontrivial boundary topology for experimental studies.
Introduction.- Non-Hermitian systems can support not only
topological phases with boundary states protected by conven-
tional band topology [1, 2], but also spectral winding topol-
ogy of complex eigenenergies which has no Hermitian ana-
logue. Nontrivial spectral winding generally emerges in many
non-Hermitian lattices under the periodic boundary condi-
tions (PBC), and vanishes when the boundary is opened (i.e.
the open boundary condition, OBC), resulting in the non-
Hermitian skin eect (NHSE) where bulk states become skin-
localized at the system’s boundary [3–7]. One of the most
noteworthy consequences of the interplay between conven-
tional and spectral winding topology is the breakdown of con-
ventional topological bulk-boundary correspondence [8, 9],
which has led to recent extensive investigations of its recovery
through several dierent methods [3, 10–14] and many other
exciting phenomena induced by NHSE and spectral winding
topology [15–36].
In contemporary literature, spectral winding topology is
mainly studied in one dimensional (1D) systems, as by def-
inition it corresponds to 1D trajectories in the two dimen-
sional (2D) complex-energy plane, which cannot be straight-
forwardly generalized into higher spatial dimensions. On
the other hand, being a boundary phenomenon, NHSE in
2D or higher dimension are also far more sophisticated than
in 1D, possessing many variations associated with dierent
boundaries and defects due to their richer geometric structures
[37–42]. In this work, we unveil an exotic aspect of spec-
tral winding in higher dimensions, namely nontrivial spec-
tral winding for 1D boundary states of 2D lattices under the
OBC, in sharp contrast to our knowledge of vanishing spec-
tral winding topology of OBC systems. Its emergence origi-
nates from the interplay between topological boundary local-
ization and a non-Hermitian chiral pumping along the bound-
ary, namely asymmetric hoppings with stronger amplitudes
toward a chiral direction [see Fig. 1(a) for an illustration].
A similar mechanism is known to be responsible for the hy-
brid skin-topological eect (HSTE) [43–46], a type of higher-
order NHSE with topological protection [47–49], which in-
duces corner skin-topological localization in 2D lattices. In-
terestingly, our example model of non-Hermitian breathing
Kagome lattice can support both nontrivial boundary spectral
winding and an OBC type of HSTE under the same param-
eters, but with dierent triangle and trapezoidal geometries,
where the chiral pumping is destroyed by geometric properties
of the latter case. In the intermedia regime between these two
scenarios, nontrivial boundary spectral winding may even co-
incide with a weak corner localization, indicating an anoma-
lous co-existence of the seemingly contradictory boundary
spectral winding and HSTE, which require rather dierent ge-
ometric properties along boundaries. Moreover, we discover
that this boundary spectral winding can be detected from a
topological response to a driving field when locally perturbing
the 2D system, providing a feasible method to extract the non-
trivial boundary topology from realistic non-Hermitian sys-
tems.
Non-Hermitian breathing Kagome model.- We consider a
non-Hermitian breathing Kagome model with asymmetric in-
tracell hoppings as shown in Fig.1(a), with its bulk Hamilto-
nian given by
H(k)=
0ta+t+
beik1ta+t
beik3
ta+t
beik10ta+t+
beik2
ta+t+
beik3ta+t
beik20
,(1)
where k1=kx/23ky/2, k2=kxand k3=kx/2+3ky/2,
t±
b=tbe±αrepresent asymmetric intercell (upward trian-
gle) hopping parameters, and tais the amplitude of intracell
arXiv:2210.12178v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 21 Oct 2022
2
(a) (b)
corner 1
corner 2 corner 3
-2 -1 0 1 2
-5
0
5
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
non-Hermitian
chiral pumping
FIG. 1. (a) A skecth of the non-Hermitian breathing Kagome lattice
with L=5 rows of unit cells. Gray area represents the 1st-order
boundary of the system, which gives the eective boundary Hamil-
tonian discussed latter. Blue arrows indicate the direction of non-
Hermitian chiral pumping along the boundary. (b) Energy spectrum
versus ta, for the system with a triangle geometry in the Hermitian
limit of α=0. Eigenenergies are marked by dierent colors ac-
cording to their corresponding FD. Other parameters are tb=1 and
L=30.
(downward triangle) Hermitian hopping. Here we set tb=1
as the unit energy. In the Hermitian scenario with α=0,
the Kagome lattice model supports both 1st-order edge states
and 2nd-order corner states in certain parameter regimes, as
shown in Fig. 1(b) where dierent bulk and boundary states
are characterized by dierent values of their fractal dimension
(FD), defined as
FD =ln[X
r|ψn,r|4]/ln 3N,(2)
with ψn,rthe wave amplitude at position rof the n-th eigen-
state, and Nthe total number of unit cells. In a triangle ge-
ometry, N=(1 +L)L/2 with Lthe number of rows of unit
cells in the lattice. A 2D bulk state and a 1D edge state in
our system shall have their FD close to 2 and 1 respectively.
As seen in Fig. 1(b), the breathing Kagome lattice supports
1D edge states (represented by green color for FD '1.2) in a
large parameter regime.
Destructive interference of non-reciprocity and boundary
spectral winding.- By construction, the model can be viewed
as a combination of three sets of non-Hermitian Su-Schrieer-
Heeger (SSH) chains [3, 50–52] along dierent directions.
Specifically, the three non-Hermitian SSH chains are chosen
to be identical, resulting in a C3rotation symmetry of the
system, as shown in Fig. 1(a). In this way, the asymmetric
hoppings along the three directions form a closed loop and
balance out in each unit cell, leading to a destructive interfer-
ence of non-reciprocity in the bulk. The system is thus net-
reciprocal even in the presence of asymmetric hoppings. As
seen in Fig. 2(a), FD is close to 2 for eigenstates in three bulk
bands (yellow color) for the system with a triangle geometry,
indicating the absence of NHSE for bulk states. Consistently,
the summed bulk distribution, defined as
ρbulk(r)=X
nbulk |ψn,r|2
with summation runs over all eigenstates in the bulk bands,
edge
effective
corner 1 corner 2 corner 3
0
1
2
(c)
(b)
(e)
(a)
boundary
effective
-0.1
0.0
0.1
(d)
-2 0 2
-1
0
1
0
1
2
0
-1 1
ρbulk, ρedge
012
FIG. 2. (a) Energy spectrum under the OBC, colors indicate the
FD of each eigenstate. (b) and (c) Summed distribution of bulk
states and edge states respectively.(d) Spectra of edge states for the
2D lattice (cyan dots) as in (a), and 1D eective boundary sys-
tem corresponding to the gray area in Fig. 1(a) (red circles). (e)
Summed distribution of edge states for the 2D lattice (cyan), and
of all eigenstates for the 1D boundary system (red). Parameters are
ta=0.25,tb=1, α =0.5,L=30.
also distributes uniformly in the 2D bulk [Fig. 2(b)]. On
the other hand, 1st-order edge states distribute mostly along
1D edges, and are subjected to a net non-Hermitian non-
reciprocal pumping. The same mechanism is known to in-
duce the HSTE in dierent square and honeycomb lattices.
However, in our model with a triangle geometry, the de-
structive interference of non-reciprocity limits the choices of
the non-reciprocal directions and forbids the HSTE. Namely,
in the presence of destructive interference of non-reciprocity
along three directions, a triangle lattice must have chiral non-
reciprocal pumping along its 1D boundary, hence it is im-
possible to have two edges with non-reciprocity toward their
shared corner. Consequently, we anticipate no hybrid skin-
topological corner mode to appear in our system.
As verified in our numerical calculations, 1st-order edge
states are indeed extended along 1D edges, as shown in Fig.
2(c) by the summed edge distribution
ρedge(r)=X
nedge |ψn,r|2
with summation runs over all edge states. Interestingly, a non-
trivial spectral winding is seen to emerge for edge states, even
when the system is under OBC [Fig. 2(a)]. To understand its
emergence, we note that these edge states inhabit within the
edges of a 2D lattice, which form an eective 1D boundary
system without an open boundary, analogous to a 1D non-
reciprocal system under PBC. By taking the edges of the 2D
lattice as a 1D system decoupled from the 2D bulk, we find
that its spectrum is almost identical to that of the 1st-order
edge states of the original 2D system, as shown in Fig. 2(d).
As seen in Fig. 2(e), their eigenstates display a slightly dier-
ent but still extended distribution, as shown by ρe=Pn|ψ1D
n,x|2
摘要:

Non-HermitianboundaryspectralwindingZuxuanOu,1YuchengWang,2,3,4andLinhuLi1,1GuangdongProvincialKeyLaboratoryofQuantumMetrologyandSensing&SchoolofPhysicsandAstronomy,SunYat-SenUniversity(ZhuhaiCampus),Zhuhai519082,China2ShenzhenInstituteforQuantumScienceandEngineering,SouthernUniversityofScienceandT...

展开>> 收起<<
Non-Hermitian boundary spectral winding Zuxuan Ou1Yucheng Wang2 3 4and Linhu Li1 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Metrology and Sensing School of Physics and Astronomy.pdf

共10页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:10 页 大小:8.06MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 10
客服
关注