MORITA EQUIVALENCE AND GLOBALIZATION FOR PARTIAL HOPF ACTIONS ON NONUNITAL ALGEBRAS MARCELO MUNIZ ALVES AND TIAGO LUIZ FERRAZZA

2025-05-02 0 0 587.85KB 43 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
MORITA EQUIVALENCE AND GLOBALIZATION FOR PARTIAL HOPF
ACTIONS ON NONUNITAL ALGEBRAS
MARCELO MUNIZ ALVES AND TIAGO LUIZ FERRAZZA
Abstract. In this work we investigate partial actions of a Hopf algebra Hon nonunital alge-
bras and the associated partial smash products. We show that our partial actions correspond
to nonunital algebras in the category of partial representations of H. The central problem of
existence of a globalization for a partial action is studied in detail, and we provide sufficient con-
ditions for the existence (and uniqueness) of a minimal globalization for associative algebras in
general. Extending previous results by Abadie, Dokuchaev, Exel and Simon, we define Morita
equivalence for partial Hopf actions, and we show that if two symmetrical partial actions are
Morita equivalent then their standard globalizations are also Morita equivalent. Particularizing
to the case of a partial action on an algebra with local units, we obtain several strong results on
equivalences of categories of modules of partial smash products of algebras and partial smash
products of k-categories.
1. Introduction
A partial action of a Hopf algebra Hon a unital algebra Ais a weakened version of the well-
known concept of H-module algebra. A main motivation for introducing this subject was the
previous development of a theory of partial group actions, which had then recently culminated
in the Galois theory for partial group actions obtained by Dokuchaev, Ferrero and Paques in
[19].
Partial group actions on algebras were originally introduced by Exel in the area of C-algebras
[20], and later were being investigated from a more purely algebraic point of view. Some
important features are the construction of a partial skew group algebra AGassociated to a
partial action of Gon A, which is a G-graded algebra, which is well-suited for the computation
of cohomology invariants [20, 3]; the existence, with mild hypotheses, of a globalization or
enveloping action of Gon an algebra Bwhich contains Aas an ideal, with partial action
induced by the G-action on B[17]; a Morita context between the skew group algebra AG
and the skew group algebra BGof its globalization [17]; a Galois theory for partial actions
[19].
Partial actions of Hopf algebras on unital algebras first appear in [10]. In this paper,
Caenepeel and Jansen show that to a (unital) partial H-module algebra Athere corresponds a
nonunital algebra structure on the tensor product AH, and the idempotent 1A#1Hgenerates
a unital ideal called the partial smash product A#H. It was shown in [4] that there is always
an H-module algebra Bwhich globalizes A, and that there is a Morita context between A#H
and B#H. There is a Hopf-Galois theory as well for partial actions and coactions [10], and
partial H-module algebras may be characterized as algebras in an appropriate category, the
category of partial representations [6]; (see the survey [15]).
From this point on the theory was extended in the direction of generalizing the objects
that act, the ones that are acted upon, or both. In the first case, there are partial actions of
Date: October 31, 2022.
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 16T05, Secondary 16S40.
Key words and phrases. Partial action; partial representation; nonunital algebra; globalization; Morita equiva-
lence.
This study was financed in part by the Coordena¸ao de Aperfei¸coamento de Pessoal de N´ıvel Superior – Brasil
(CAPES) – Finance Code 001. The first author was partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvi-
mento Cient´ıfico e Tecnol´ogico - CNPq (project 309469/2019-8).
1
arXiv:2210.15403v2 [math.RA] 28 Oct 2022
weak Hopf algebras on unital algebras [11]; in the second case, there are the partial actions of
Hopf algebras on k-categories [2]; and there are partial actions of multiplier Hopf algebras on
nondegenerate nonunital algebras, which fall in the third case [9, 21].
In the present work we investigate partial actions of Hopf algebras on nonunital algebras
in the broadest sense possible, including the degenerate ones, but we also study in depth the
case of partial actions on algebras with local units. This approach was motivated by partial
Hopf actions on k-categories, which were in turn inspired by group actions and Hopf actions
on categories [13, 23].
We relate partial H-module nonunital algebras and nonunital algebras in the category of
partial representations of H(Theorem 22). Constructing the partial smash product A#H, we
relate its left modules with the (A, H)-modules, extending a result from [12]. We introduce
globalizations and we establish sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of minimal
globalizations (Thm. 41 and Thm. 43). It is also proved that there is a strict Morita context
between A#Hand B#H, where Bis a globalization of the partial action of Hon A.
In [2] it was shown that every partial action on a k-category Cinduces a partial action on
the “matrix algebra” a(C), which is an algebra with local units. Conversely, given an algebra
Awith a system of local units S, one may construct a k-category CS(A), and we study partial
actions on Athat induce partial actions on this category. We prove that the category of the
left unital modules of Ais equivalent to the category of the left modules of the category CS(A).
Also, if Cis a k-category, we proved that the category of the left C-modules and the category
of the left unital a(C)-modules are equivalent.
We develop a theory of Morita equivalence of partial Hopf actions, extending the concept
and results of Morita equivalence of partial group actions presented in [1]. Following the
first results of Abadie, Dokuchaev, Exel and Sim´on, in [1], we define the concept of Morita
equivalence of partial H-actions, and with this we prove that every symmetric partial action
on an idempotent algebra is Morita equivalent to a partial action where the algebra has trivial
right (or left) annihilator (Thm. 86). In [1], the authors constructed a canonical globalization
for a regular partial group action and proved that whenever two regular partial G-actions are
Morita equivalent, the global actions of its canonical globalizations are also Morita equivalent;
we have obtained a similar result for partial H-actions (Thm. 87).
Finally, it also holds that if His a Hopf algebra and Ais a partial H-module algebra with a
system of local units S, then the categories of modules over the algebras A#Hand a(CS(A))#H,
and over the k-category CS(A)#H, are all equivalent (Corollaries 84 and 85).
Throughout this work, all the linear structures will be considered over a field k; for instance,
algebra means k-algebra. Unless otherwise stated, “module” stands for “left module” and
“partial action” stands for “left partial action”.
2. Partial Hopf Actions
The intent of the next three subsections is to relate the suggested definition of partial Hopf
actions on associative algebras with previous results found in the literature.
2.1. Partial Hopf Actions and the Smash Product. In [10], Caenepeel and Jansen intro-
duced the concept of a Hopf algebra Hacting partially on a unital algebra Aas a linear map
from HAto Awhich satisfies some necessary and sufficient conditions for the respective
smash product A#Hto be a unital, associative algebra.
Definition 1 ([10]).Let Hbe a Hopf algebra and Aan algebra with unit 1A. A linear map
·:HAA,ha7→ h·ais called a partial action of Hon Aif, for all a, b A,h, g H,
(1) 1H·a=a;
(2) h·(ab) = P(h(1) ·a)(h(2) ·b);
(3) h·(g·a) = P(h(1) ·1A)(h(2)g·a),
2
where ∆(h) = Ph(1) h(2). In this case we say that Ais a partial H-module algebra with
unity. If the equality
(4) h·(g·a) = P(h(1)g·a)(h(2) ·1A)
also holds, then we say that this partial action is symmetrical [2] .
Inspired by [2] and, mainly, by [10], we introduce the following definition of a partial action
on associative algebras in general.
Definition 2. Let Abe an associative algebra. A linear map ·:HAA,ha7−h·a
will be called a partial action of Hon Aif, for all a, b A,h, k H,
(1) 1H·a=a;
(2) h·(a(k·b)) = P(h(1) ·a)(h(2)k·b).
In this case, Awill be called a partial H-module algebra. We will say that the partial action is
symmetrical if, additionally,
(3) h·((k·b)a) = P(h(1)k·b)(h(2) ·a)
for every a, b A,h, k H.
In [9] the authors considered partial actions of multiplier Hopf algebras on nondegenerate
algebras; here we are considering partial actions of Hopf algebras on all kind of associative
algebras, introducing additional nondegeneracy properties only when needed. At the end of
this section we will show that when His a Hopf algebra and Ais a nondegenerate algebra,
then both definitions of partial action coincide.
Recall that the right annihilator of an algebra Ais the ideal
r(A) = {aA|ba = 0,bA}.
Analogously, the left annihilator of Ais the ideal
l(A) = {bA|ba = 0,aA}.
The following lemmas follow closely the equivalence presented in [10] mentioned in the be-
ginning of this section. For this, we will assume that His a Hopf algebra, Ais an associative
algebra with r(A) = 0, ·:HAAis a linear map given by ·(ha) = h·aand A#His its
associated smash product, which is the vector space AHendowed with the product
(a#h)(b#k) = a(h(1) ·b)#h(2)k.
As it is customary, to avoid confusion with the tensor algebra AH, we will use the notation
a#hfor the vector ahas an element of the algebra A#H.
Lemma 3. A#His an associative algebra if and only if
h·(a(k·b)) = X(h(1) ·a)(h(2)k·b)
for every h, k H,a, b A.
Proof. In fact, A#His an associative algebra if and only if for every a, b, c A,h, k, l H,
((c#l)(a#h))(b#k)=(c#l)((a#h)(b#k))
m
Xc(l(1) ·a)(l(2)h(1) ·b)#l(3)h(2)k=Xc(l(1) ·(a(h(1) ·b)))#l(2)h(2)k
Iε, k=1H
Xc(l(1) ·a)(l(2)h·b)=c(l·(a(h·b)))
m
c[X(l(1) ·a)(l(2)h·b)(l·(a(h·b)))] = 0.
Since r(A) = 0, we have the required equality. Conversely, if h·(a(k·b)) = P(h(1) ·a)(h(2)k·b),
clearly A#His associative.
3
The next two lemmas are proved similarly, using a“support element” cas before.
Lemma 4. A#His an A-bimodule with structure given by
b(a#h)b0=Xba(h(1) ·b0)#h(2)
if and only if
h·ab =X(h(1) ·a)(h(2) ·b),
for every hH,a, b A.
Lemma 5. The linear map ι:AA#H,a7→ a#1H, is a right A-linear morphism if and
only if 1H·a=a.
In the previous three lemmas, even if r(A)6= 0, the axioms of a partial H-module algebra
guarantee that the respective smash product will be an associative algebra, an A-bimodule and
that the inclusion ι:AA#His a right A-linear morphism. We only need r(A) = 0 for the
converse.
Proposition 6. Let Hbe a cocommutative Hopf algebra. If Aand Bare both (symmetrical)
partial H-module algebras, then ABis a (symmetrical) partial H-module algebra via
h·(ab) = Ph(1) ·ah(2) ·b.
In [2], this result was obtained (for unital algebras) as a consequence of a similar result for
partial Hopf actions on categories.
2.2. Partial H-module Algebras and Algebras in HMpar.In [6], Alves, Batista e Ver-
cruysse proved that, when the antipode of His bijective, there is a bijective correspondence
between partial H-module algebras with symmetrical partial actions and unital algebras in the
category of the partial H-modules. We will show that an analogous correspondence still holds
for nonunital algebras Athat satisfy at least one of the following properties:
(1) A2=A;
(2) l(A) = 0;
(3) r(A) = 0.
In order to do so, we consider the category of (A, H)-modules associated to a partial H-
module Aintroduced in [12]. We will show that, under the same conditions above, the category
of (A, H)-modules is equivalent to the category of A#H-modules, and then we use the fact that
the partial H-modules are the same as modules over an appropriate partial smash product.
We begin by recalling the definition of a partial representation of a Hopf algebra from [8],
which is a shorter version of the one originally introduced in [6].
Proposition 7. [8, Lemma 2.11] Let Hbe a Hopf k-algebra, Bbe a unital k-algebra and
π:HBbe a linear map. The following are equivalent:
(1) π:HBsatisfies
(PR1) π(1H) = 1B;
(PR2) π(h)π(k(1))π(S(k(2))) = π(hk(1))π(S(k(2))), for every h, k H;
(PR3) π(h(1))π(S(h(2)))π(k) = π(h(1))π(S(h(2))k), for every h, k H.
(2) π:HBsatisfies
(PR1) π(1H) = 1B;
(PR4) π(h)π(S(k(1)))π(k(2)) = π(hS(k(1)))π(k(2)), for every h, k H;
(PR5) π(S(h(1)))π(h(2))π(k) = π(S(h(1)))π(h(2)k), for every h, k H.
Definition 8. Let Hbe a Hopf k-algebra, and let Bbe a unital k-algebra. A partial repre-
sentation of Hin Bis a linear map π:HBwhich satisfies the equivalent conditions of
Proposition 7.
Remark 9 ([6]).If His cocommutative, then the items in the definition of a partial represen-
tation coalesce into (PR1),(PR2) and (PR5).
4
We will show in the following that, under mild conditions, a partial H-module algebra A
carries a partial representation π:HEnd(A) (this is well-known when Ais unital).
First note that if Ais any partial H-module algebra, then for all x, y A,hH, we have
that Xh(1) ·S(h(2))·xy =X(h(1) ·S(h(2))·x)y, (1)
because
Xh(1) ·S(h(2))·xy =Xh(1) ·[(S(h(3))·x)(S(h(2))·y)]
=X(h(1) ·S(h(4))·x)(h(2)S(h(3))·y)
=X(h(1) ·S(h(2))·x)y.
Equality (1) means that the linear map a7→ Ph(1) ·S(h(2))·ais a right A-module map from
Ato Afor every hH. Analogously, if the partial action is symmetrical, the equality
XS(h(1))·h(2) ·xy =x(XS(h(1))·h(2) ·y) (2)
means that the linear map a7→ PS(h(1))·h(2) ·ais a left A-module map from Ato Afor every
hH.
Lemma 10. Let Abe a partial H-module algebra with symmetrical partial action and Ha Hopf
algebra. If Ais either idempotent, l(A) = 0 or r(A) = 0 and the antipode of His bijective,
then the linear map π:HEnd(A), defined by π(h)(a) = h·a, is a partial representation.
Proof. (PR1) is straightforward: given aA,π(1H)(a) = 1H·a=a, therefore π(1H) = idA.Let
us proceed by proving (PR2) and (PR3) first for an idempotent algebra A.
Since for any element aAthere exist b1, . . . , bn, c1, . . . , cnAsuch that a=Pn
i=1 biciand
πis a linear map, we only need to check the axioms of partial representation for elements of
the form xy A. Let x, y Aand h, k H, and
Xπ(h)π(k(1))π(S(k(2)))(xy) = Xh·k(1) ·S(k(2))·(xy)
(1)
=Xh·((k(1) ·S(k(2))·x)y)
=X(h(1)k(1) ·S(k(2))·x)(h(2) ·y)
=X(h(1)k(1) ·S(k(4))·x)(h(2)k(2)S(k(3))·y)
=Xhk(1) ·[(S(k(3))·x)(S(k(2))·y)]
=Xhk(1) ·S(k(2))·(xy)
=Xπ(hk(1))π(S(k(2)))(xy).
This proves that item (PR2) holds. For item (PR3), we have that
Xπ(k(1))π(S(k(2)))π(h)(xy) = Xk(1) ·S(k(2))·h·(xy)
=Xk(1) ·S(k(2))·(h(1) ·x)(h(2) ·y)
=Xk(1) ·[(S(k(3))h(1) ·x)(S(k(2))·h(2) ·y)]
=X(k(1) ·S(k(2))h(1) ·x)(h(2) ·y)
=Xk(1) ·[(S(k(3))h(1) ·x)(S(k(2))h(2) ·y)]
=Xk(1) ·S(k(2))h·(xy)
=Xπ(k(1))π(S(k(2)h))(xy).
5
摘要:

MORITAEQUIVALENCEANDGLOBALIZATIONFORPARTIALHOPFACTIONSONNONUNITALALGEBRASMARCELOMUNIZALVESANDTIAGOLUIZFERRAZZAAbstract.InthisworkweinvestigatepartialactionsofaHopfalgebraHonnonunitalalge-brasandtheassociatedpartialsmashproducts.Weshowthatourpartialactionscorrespondtononunitalalgebrasinthecategoryofp...

展开>> 收起<<
MORITA EQUIVALENCE AND GLOBALIZATION FOR PARTIAL HOPF ACTIONS ON NONUNITAL ALGEBRAS MARCELO MUNIZ ALVES AND TIAGO LUIZ FERRAZZA.pdf

共43页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:43 页 大小:587.85KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 43
客服
关注