experiment argues that the idea of physicalism cannot explain differences in internal experiences,
such as the appearance and perception of colors among observers.
1.4 Existence of free will
B. Rivett attached a device that measured brain electrical signals to participants in the
experiment and had them move their wrists freely to measure brain electrical signals at that time (B.
Rivet, 1980). When we move our bodies, it is known that electrical signals, commands to move our
muscles, come out of our brains shortly before we move. The results of the experiment were in the
following order.
1)The brain produces electrical signals to move the wrist
2)Conscious to move the wrist
3)Wrist moves
This means that the brain is sending electrical signals to move the wrist before the person is
conscious of moving the wrist, and the wrist is already set to move before the person is conscious of
moving the wrist. In other words, the wrists did not move because he was conscious of moving them.
The normal human feeling that the wrist has moved because he or she wanted to move the wrist by
his or her own will is an "illusion," and before that will, the wrist has been determined to move by
something unconscious, and the command is coming out of the brain unconsciously. In the middle of
the process of moving the wrist, it is a state in which the conscious mind is aware in the pursuit of
"let's move." B. Rivet, between 2) and 3) above, there is a short time left for refusing to move the wrist,
within which man can stop the action at his own will. So, he concludes that human beings have free
will. However, there is no harm in interpreting the results of this experiment by thinking that it is
"consciousness" - i.e., that there is no free will - to recognize the results of unconscious random
processing in the brain as an afterthought. B. Rivet's interpretation of the experiment has been
criticized by dualistic interpreters and others. However, if we take the view of "consciousness" in the
absence of free will, we can assume that the brain unconsciously and randomly processes certain
options based on physicalism. If we consider the post-processing recognition at the stage when the
processing is determined to be "consciousness," we believe that it does not go against physicalism and
does not cause a "hard problem of consciousness.". In dualism, apart from physical phenomena, there
is non-physical "consciousness" that cannot be measured by physics. However, it fails to explain why
and how non-physical consciousness can influence our behavior and the processing of the brain, which
is a physical phenomenon. If consciousness, which is non-physical, can affect physics, we must also
consider the existence of so-called "telekinesis" and the possibility of consciousness in all things, which
seems to make interpretation more complicated.
1.5 Isolated Brains
Isolated brain is a condition in which the corpus callosum connecting the left and right sides of
the brain is removed for the purpose of treating epilepsy, etc. This prevents information from being
exchanged between the left and right sides of the brain. The left side of the brain is primarily
responsible for language areas, while the right side is responsible for imaging areas. If we ask a
subject with a separate brain, showing the subject only to his right eye, which is processed by his left
brain, "What is it?" he can tell. Conversely, if the left eye, which connects to the right side of the brain,
is seen alone, the right side of the brain, which connects to the right side of the brain, answers "I can't
see anything" because it can't process language. On the other hand, if we let him draw a picture of
the subject, his right brain, which controls the image area, can draw without any problem. It is
sometimes said that this separate brain subject has two personalities = consciousness. Considering
this, we think that consciousness is physically dominated, or at least influenced, by the physical state