Bose-Hubbard triangular ladder in an articial gauge eld Catalin-Mihai Halati1and Thierry Giamarchi1 1Department of Quantum Matter Physics University of Geneva Quai Ernest-Ansermet 24 1211 Geneva Switzerland

2025-04-30 0 0 3.56MB 24 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Bose-Hubbard triangular ladder in an artificial gauge field
Catalin-Mihai Halati1and Thierry Giamarchi1
1Department of Quantum Matter Physics, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 24, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
(Dated: February 21, 2023)
We consider interacting bosonic particles on a two-leg triangular ladder in the presence of an
artificial gauge field. We employ density matrix renormalization group numerical simulations and
analytical bosonization calculations to study the rich phase diagram of this system. We show that
the interplay between the frustration induced by the triangular lattice geometry and the interactions
gives rise to multiple chiral quantum phases. Phase transition between superfluid to Mott-insulating
states occur, which can have Meissner or vortex character. Furthermore, a state that explicitly
breaks the symmetry between the two legs of the ladder, the biased chiral superfluid, is found for
values of the flux close to π. In the regime of hardcore bosons, we show that the extension of the
bond order insulator beyond the case of the fully frustrated ladder exhibits Meissner-type chiral
currents. We discuss the consequences of our findings for experiments in cold atomic systems.
I. INTRODUCTION
The interplay between kinetic energy and interactions
leads, for quantum systems, to a very rich set of many-
body phases with remarkable properties, such as super-
conductivity, or Mott insulators. This is particularly true
in reduced dimensionality, where the effects of interac-
tions are at their maximum. This leads in one dimension
to a set of properties, known as Tomonaga-Luttinger liq-
uids [1]. These are quite different from the typical physics
that exists in higher dimensions, characterized by ordered
states with single particle type excitations, such as Bo-
goliubov excitations for bosons, or Landau quasiparticles
for fermions.
An intermediate situation is provided by ladders, i.e. a
small number of one-dimensional (1D) chains coupled by
tunneling. Such systems possess some unique properties,
different from both the one-and the high-dimensional
ones. For example fermionic ladders exhibit supercon-
ductivity with purely repulsive interactions, at variance
with isolated 1D chains that are dominated by antiferro-
magnetic correlations [2].
Ladders are also the minimal systems in which the or-
bital effects of a magnetic field can be explored. For
bosonic ladders this has allowed to predict [3] the exis-
tence of quantum phase transitions as a function of the
flux between a low field phase with current along the
legs (Meissner phase) and a high field phase with cur-
rents across the rungs and the presence of vortices (vortex
phase), akin to the transition occurring in type II super-
conductors. Ultracold atomic systems offer the possibil-
ity of studying such systems coupled to artificial gauge
fields [4,5], and the Meissner to vortex phase transition
has been observed experimentally [6]. These works have
paved the way for a flurry of studies for other situations
both for bosonic and fermionic ladders [3,730]. Further-
more, properties beyond the phase diagram, such as the
Hall effect, were also studied [31,32] and even measured
[3335].
These extensive studies of ladders have however con-
centrated mostly on square ladders, for which the effect
of hopping is unfrustrated, leaving the case of triangular
ladders under flux relatively unexplored, despite some
previous studies focusing on particular setups, or corners
of the phase diagram [3645]. The triangular structure is
not bipartite and, thus, prevents the particle-hole sym-
metry that occurs naturally in square lattices. This has
drastic consequences since it leads to frustration of the
kinetic energy and, thus, to quite different properties, as
was largely explored for two-dimensional systems [4650].
In this paper, we explore the phase diagram of a tri-
angular two leg bosonic ladder under an artificial mag-
netic field. We consider bosons with a contact repulsive
interaction. We study, using a combination of analyti-
cal bosonization and numerical density matrix renormal-
ization group (DMRG) techniques the phase diagram of
such a system as a function of the magnetic field, filling
and repulsion between the bosons. We discuss in partic-
ular our findings in comparison with the phases found for
the square ladders.
The plan of the paper is as follows, in Sec. II we de-
scribe the model considered, its non-interacting limit and
the observables of interest. In Sec. III we briefly dis-
cuss the methods employed in this work. We present
the results regarding the phase diagram at half filling in
Sec. IV. In this regime, we identify the following quan-
tum phases, the Meissner superfluid (M-SF), the vortex
superfluid (V-SF) and the biased chiral superfluid (BC-
SF), which breaks the Z2symmetry of the ladder. For
the fully frustrated π-flux ladder, Sec. IV C, we obtain a
transition between superfluid and chiral superfluid states.
In the limit of hardcore bosons, Sec. V, at πflux we have
successive phase transitions between superfluid, bond or-
der insulator and chiral superfluid states. The bond order
extends in the phase diagram for lower values of the flux
to the chiral bond order insulator (C-BOI). At unity fill-
ing for interacting bosons, Sec. VI, also a Meissner Mott
insulator (M-MI) can be found in the phase diagram. We
discuss our results in Sec. VII and conclude in Sec. VIII.
arXiv:2210.14594v2 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 20 Feb 2023
2
FIG. 1: Sketch of the setup. The bosonic atoms are confined
in a quasi-one-dimensional triangular ladder. The legs are
numbered by m= 1,2 and the sites on each leg by j. The
atoms tunnel along the legs with the amplitude Jk, along the
rungs with the amplitude Jand have an on-site interaction
of strength U. Each triangular plaquette is pierced by a flux
χ.
II. MODEL
A. Setup
We consider interacting bosonic atoms confined to a
triangular ladder in an artificial gauge field, as sketched
in Fig. 1. The Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian of the system
is given by
H=Hk+H+Hint,(1)
Hk=Jk
L1
X
j=1 eb
j,1bj+1,1+eb
j,2bj+1,2+ H.c.,
H=J
L
X
j=1 b
j,1bj,2+ H.c.
J
L1
X
j=1 b
j+1,1bj,2+ H.c.,
Hint =U
2
L
X
j=1
2
X
m=1
nj,m(nj,m 1).
The bosonic operator bj,m and b
j,m are the annihila-
tion and creation operators of the particles at position
jand leg m= 1,2. We consider a total number of
N=PL
j=1 P2
m=1 nj,m atoms and that the ladder has
Lsites on each leg. The atomic density is given by
ρ=N/(2L). Hkdescribes the tunneling along the two
legs of the ladder, indexed by j, with amplitude Jk. The
complex factor in the hopping stems from the artificial
magnetic field, with flux χ[4,5]. The tunneling along the
rungs of the ladder is given by Hand has amplitude J.
The atoms interact repulsively with with an on-site in-
teraction strength U > 0.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
FIG. 2: Single particle dispersion of model (1), E±(k) (2), as
a function of momentum k, for (a) Jk/J = 0.2, (b) Jk/J = 1,
(c) Jk/J = 2, (d) Jk/J = 5, and different values of the flux
χ∈ {π/4, π/2,3π/4, π}. Note the presence of the two minima
away from k= 0 for some values of the flux and transverse
hopping.
B. Non-interacting limit
In the non-interacting, U= 0, limit we can exactly
diagonalize the Hamiltonian (1) (see Appendix A) and
obtain the following dispersion relation
E±(k) = 2Jkcos(k) cos(χ) (2)
±q2J2[1 + cos(k)] + 4J2
ksin2(k) sin2(χ).
The non-interacting bands, E±(k), are represented in
Fig. 2for several values of Jk/J and χ. We can observe
that the lower band can have either a single minimum at
k= 0, e.g. for Fig. 2(a) for Jk/J = 0.5 and χ= 0.25π,
or two minima at finite values of k, e.g. for Fig. 2(c)
for Jk/J = 2 and χ= 0.5π. The position of the double
minima depends on Jk/J and χ.
The topology of the lower band can already provide
some hints regarding the nature of the ground state in
the case of weakly interacting bosons. Similarly with the
analysis performed in the case of the square ladder with
flux [12,18] we expect phases of the following natures:
Meissner states in the case in which the bosons condense
in the k= 0 minimum; vortex phases, in the case of
two condensates in the two minima of the lower band;
and states which break the Z2symmetry of the ladder,
corresponding to a condensate in just one of the double
minima. In Sec. IV and Sec. VI we show how these states
are realized on the triangular ladder in the interacting
regime.
3
C. Observables of interest
In the rest of this section, we describe some of the ob-
servables which are suitable for the investigation of the
chiral phases we obtain in this system. We define the lo-
cal currents on the leg jk
j,m and the rung j
j, respectively,
as
jk
j,m =iJke(1)mb
j,mbj+1,m H.c.,(3)
j
2j1=iJ(b
j,1bj,2H.c.),
j
2j=iJ(b
j+1,1bj,2H.c.).
In addition to the local currents, the chiral current Jcand
the average rung current Jrare of interest and defined as
Jc=1
2(L1) X
jDjk
j,1jk
j,2E,(4)
Jr=1
2L1X
jj
j.
In order to identify biased phases, in which the Z2
symmetry between the two legs of the ladder is broken,
we compute the density imbalance
n=1
2LX
j
(nj,1nj,2).(5)
Furthermore, we compute the central charge c, which
can be interpreted as the number of gapless modes. We
extract the central charge from the scaling of the von
Neumann entanglement entropy SvN (l) of an embedded
subsystem of length lin a chain of length L. For open
boundary conditions the entanglement entropy for the
ground state of gapless phases is given by [5153]
SvN =c
6log L
πsin πl
L+s1,(6)
where s1is a non-universal constant, and we neglect log-
arithmic corrections [54] and oscillatory terms [55] due
to the finite size of the system.
III. METHODS
A. Bosonization
The low-energy physics of one dimensional interact-
ing quantum systems, corresponding to the Tomonaga-
Luttinger liquids universality class, can be described in
terms of two bosonic fields φand θ[1]. These bosonic
fields are related to the collective excitations of density
and currents and fulfill the canonical commutation rela-
tion, [φ(x),θ(x0)] = δ(xx0). In the bosonized rep-
resentation, the single particle operator of the bosonic
atoms can be written as [1]:
b
j= ()1
2
e(aj)+X
p6=0
ei2p[πρajφ(aj)]e(aj)
,
(7)
with ρthe density and athe lattice spacing. In the fol-
lowing, we take a= 1.
B. MPS ground state simulations
The numerical results were obtained using a finite-
size density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) algo-
rithm in the matrix product state (MPS) representation
[5660], implemented using the ITensor Library [61]. We
compute the ground state of the model (1) for ladders
with a number of rungs between L= 60 and L= 180,
and with a maximal bond dimension up to 1800. This en-
sures that the truncation error is at most 109. Since we
are considering a bosonic model with finite interactions
the local Hilbert space is very large, thus, a cutoff for
its dimension is needed. We use a maximal local dimen-
sion of at least four or five bosons per site. We checked
that the local states with a higher number of bosons per
site do not have an occupation larger than 105for the
parameters considered. We make use of good quantum
numbers in our implementation as the number of atoms
is conserved in the considered model.
IV. PHASE DIAGRAM AT HALF FILLING,
ρ= 0.5
M-SF
V-SF
BC-SF
FIG. 3: Sketch of the phase diagram for half-filling, ρ= 0.5,
for U/J = 2.5. The identified phases (see text) are the Meiss-
ner superfluid (M-SF), the vortex superfluid (V-SF) and the
biased chiral superfluid (BC-SF). At χ=π(marked by a thick
vertical line) we have a phase transition between a superfluid
(green) and a chiral superfluid (dark blue).
4
(a)
(b)
(c)
V-SF
M-SF, M-MI
CBO-I
BC-SF
C-SF
(d)
(e)
FIG. 4: The pattern of currents, depicted with arrows, and
local densities, depicted with red disks, obtained in the nu-
merical ground state results for the (a) Meissner states (M-SF,
or M-MI) (b) vortex superfluid phases (V-SF), (c) biased chi-
ral superfluid (BC-SF), (d) chiral superfluid (C-SF), and (e)
chiral bond order insulator (CBO-I), where we also marked
the bond ordering on every second rung. We note that the
local currents are not normalized to the same value for the
different phases represented in the four sketches.
In this section, we focus for the case in which we have
one bosonic atom every two sites, ρ= 0.5. In Fig. 3we
sketch the phase diagram we obtain from our numerical
and analytical results which we detail in the following. In
particular, we focus on several regions on the phase dia-
gram. We investigate the limit of small Jk(see Sec. IV A),
where we obtain a Meissner superfluid (M-SF). At large
Jkwe observe a phase transition between the Meissner
superfluid (M-SF) and a vortex superfluid (V-SF) state
(see Sec. IV B). At χ=πa transition between a super-
fluid and a chiral superfluid state is present (Sec. IV C),
and for χ.πthe chiral superfluid extends to a biased
chiral superfluid phase (BC-SF). Throughout this section
the value of the on-site interaction is U/J = 2.5.
A. Small Jklimit - single chain limit
In the regime of small Jk/J it is useful to rewrite the
Hamiltonian given in (1) as a single chain with long range
FIG. 5: Numerical ground state results for the average rung
current, Jr, and the chiral current, Jc, as a function of the flux
χfor Jk/J = 0.2, U/J = 2.5, ρ= 0.5, L∈ {60,120,180}. The
inset contains the dependence of the central charge, c, on the
flux. We can identify the Meissner superfluid phase. We note
that the markers corresponding to the smaller system sizes are
below the ones for L= 180. The maximal bond dimension
used was m= 500 for L= 60, m= 900 for L= 120 and
m= 1500 for L= 180.
complex hopping
Hchain =JkX
jhei(1)jχb
jbj+2 + H.c.i(8)
JX
jb
jbj+1 + H.c.
+U
2X
j
nj(nj1).
In this case the bosonized Hamiltonian is
Hchain =Zdx
2πnuK + 16πρJkcos(χ)xθ(x)2(9)
+u
Kxφ(x)2o
+ρ2UZdx cos [2(x)] ,
with the velocity u, Luttinger parameter K, and p= 1
for ρ= 1 and p= 2 for ρ= 0.5. For the atomic density
considered in this section we expect that the interaction
term does not dominate and we obtain a Luttinger liq-
uid for which the Luttinger parameter depends on the
flux χ. As we see in the following this is in agreement
with our numerical results. However, we note slight devi-
ations from the analytical expectation of the dependence
of effective Luttinger parameter on χand the numerical
results (see Appendix B).
In the single chain limit the local current observables
(4) can be rewritten as
j
j=iJ b
jbj+1 H.c.(10)
jk
j=iJkhe(1)jb
jbj+2 H.c.i.
5
(a)
(b)
(c)
FIG. 6: Numerical ground state results for (a) the average
rung current, Jr, and the chiral current, Jc, (b) the central
charge, c, and (c) the absolute value of the density imbalance,
|n|, as a function of the flux χfor Jk/J = 0.5, U/J = 2.5,
ρ= 0.5, L∈ {60,120,180}. We observe a transition from
the Meissner superfluid to the biased chiral superfluid at χ
0.75π. The maximal bond dimension used was m= 600 for
L= 60, m= 1200 for L= 120 and m= 1800 for L= 180.
In terms of the bosonic field the currents read
j
j= 2ρJ sin (xθ),(11)
jk
j= 2ρJksin h2xθ+ (1)jχ
2i,
jk
j+1 jk
j= 2ρJkcos (2xθ) sin(χ).
In the obtained gapless phase the expectation value of
the rung currents will average to zero, and the chiral
current has a finite value JcPjDjk
j,1jk
j,2Esin(χ).
These results are consistent with the currents expected
in the Meissner superfluid phase, which are depicted in
Fig. 4(a), and their values are shown in Fig. 5.
In Fig. 5at small values of the leg tunneling ampli-
tude, Jk/J = 0.2, we observe that the currents on the
rungs are close to zero and the chiral current, Jc, has a
finite value stable with increasing the system size. The
central charge is c1 for all values of the flux, implying
the existence of one gapless mode. Furthermore, in this
phase, the single particle correlations decay algebraically
with the distance (see Appendix B). Based on these con-
siderations we can identify the Meissner superfluid state.
However, we identify some small deviations from the ex-
pected sin(χ) dependence of the chiral current (Fig. 5).
We can observe in Eq. (9) for large values of Jkand χ
πthe coefficient of the first term in the Hamiltonian will
vanish and eventually become negative. This instability
in our bosonized model could signal a phase transition.
In the numerical results for Jk/J = 0.5, presented in
Fig. 6, we see above χ&0.75 a phase with strong currents
and central charge c1. Furthermore, a finite density
imbalance between the two legs of the ladder is present.
We associate this regime with the biased chiral superfluid
phase. We describe in more details the nature of this
phase in Sec. IV D.
We observe in the numerical results that the value of
the Luttinger parameter extracted from the algebraic de-
cay of the single particle correlations decreases and it is
close to zero as we increase χtowards the phase tran-
sition between the Meissner superfluid and the biased
chiral superfluid (see Appendix B).
B. Large Jklimit - two coupled chains limit
We bosonize the Hamiltonian of the two coupled chains
(1) in the limit where tunneling Jkalong the two chains
dominate. In this regime we have a pair of bosonic fields
摘要:

Bose-Hubbardtriangularladderinanarti cialgauge eldCatalin-MihaiHalati1andThierryGiamarchi11DepartmentofQuantumMatterPhysics,UniversityofGeneva,QuaiErnest-Ansermet24,1211Geneva,Switzerland(Dated:February21,2023)Weconsiderinteractingbosonicparticlesonatwo-legtriangularladderinthepresenceofanarti cialg...

展开>> 收起<<
Bose-Hubbard triangular ladder in an articial gauge eld Catalin-Mihai Halati1and Thierry Giamarchi1 1Department of Quantum Matter Physics University of Geneva Quai Ernest-Ansermet 24 1211 Geneva Switzerland.pdf

共24页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:24 页 大小:3.56MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-30

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 24
客服
关注