A multiscale method for inhomogeneous elastic problems with high contrast coecients Zhongqian Wang1 Changqing Ye1 Eric T. Chung1

2025-04-30 0 0 1.12MB 23 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
A multiscale method for inhomogeneous elastic
problems with high contrast coefficients
Zhongqian Wang1,, Changqing Ye1, Eric T. Chung1
1Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Abstract: In this paper, we develop the constrained energy minimizing generalized multiscale finite element
method (CEM-GMsFEM) with mixed boundary conditions (Dirichlet and Neumann) for the elasticity equations
in high contrast media. By a special treatment of mixed boundary conditions separately, and combining the
construction of the relaxed and constraint version of the CEM-GMsFEM, we discover that the method offers
some advantages such as the independence of the target region’s contrast from precision, while the sizes of
oversampling domains have a significant impact on numerical accuracy. Moreover, to our best knowledge, this
is the first proof of the convergence of the CEM-GMsFEM with mixed boundary conditions for the elasticity
equations given. Some numerical experiments are provided to demonstrate the method’s performance.
Keywords: CEM-GMsFEM; mixed boundary conditions; high contrast media
1 Introduction
The study of elastic inhomogeneous mixed boundary conditions is a major area of research in the field
of inverse problems, which has wide and practical applications in many fields such as geophysics, oil
exploration, remote sensing, ocean exploration, radar and sonar [3,6,27,28]. In the past decades, many
researchers in different fields have been actively exploring computationally efficient methods for solving
mixed boundary PDEs, for example, avoiding internal nodes or domain discretization to evaluate specific
solutions [22], multiscale extensions and averaging techniques to approximate models with asymptotically
small chemical patterns [4,26], and inhomogeneous boundary treatments for fluid-related models in
physics [5,13]. A challenging problem that arises in this domain is the solid rheological properties
of materials at the interface, such as the viscoelastic contact interface between transparent plexiglass
components and supports used in aerospace and underwater vehicles, the creep problem at the contact
interface between different metallic materials in high-temperature environments, and the mechanical
behavior of materials with high contrast parameters for interfaces with complete bonding [14,15]. These
traditional methods are no longer valid.
A different approach to the traditional problem is Multiscale Finite Element Methods (MsFEM)
[2,7,16]. MsFEMs have been developed over the past decades by transforming microscale inhomo-
geneous information into macroscale parameters via homogenization or up-scaling, and then solving at
the macroscale level, which mainly includes Representative Volume Element Methods (RVEMs) [18],
Heterogeneous Multiscale Methods (HMMs) [1,12]. However, these methods are difficult to handle the
grid-dependent elimination of the localization phenomenon. Generalized multiscale finite element method
(GMsFEM) [11] was then proposed to obtain an efficient eigenvalue approximation using a local-global
model reduction technique, where the constructed global multiscale space can be applied repeatedly to
get an efficient multiscale solution with reduced degrees of freedom at the macroscopic scale. Moreover,
GMsFEM has been widely adopted in the field of equivalent parameter prediction, elastic wave propa-
gation, acoustic analysis and gradient theory [8]. Regardless of implementation complexity, the above
Corresponding author.
1
arXiv:2210.11297v1 [math.NA] 20 Oct 2022
methods have a similar issue: the potential high computing cost of handling inhomogeneous issues in
intricate large-scale models.
In this paper, we aim to develop the constraint energy minimizing generalized multiscale Galerkin
method (CEM-GMsFEM) to solve the complex elastic PDEs with mixed inhomogeneous boundary con-
ditions. As far as we know, no previous research has investigated in this field. Although the bit-structural
properties of common concrete [17], alloys, and other materials in engineering have obvious effects on
macroscopic properties, these materials also have typical inhomogeneous and multiscale characteristics,
and there are three main difficulties in using the FEMs to deal with these complex material boundary
problems:
In the physical sense, the intrinsic structure equations lack internal length parameters characterizing
the microstructural features of the material, and heterogeneous theory cannot reasonably explain.
In the numerical calculation, the spatial complexity of the microstructural information of hetero-
geneous materials can cause expensive computation time and the choice of minimum scale and
minimum degrees of freedom is difficult to balance.
In the validation of the computational method, when using oversampling techniques to construct
multiscale basis functions, it is difficult to find a suitable model to improve the accuracy of the
method.
We could use an improved CEM-GMsFEM to address the three limitations presented above [9]. Some
works have demonstrated that the convergence of this method is independent of contrast, and that it
decreases linearly with grid size for an appropriate choice of oversampling size [19]. At the same time,
CEM-GMsFEM is widely used in physical, geographical and environmental engineering [20,21], its online
methods have been introduced to adaptively construct multiscale basis functions in certain regions to
significantly reduce errors [10]. In the case of mixed boundary conditions, it is difficult to choose an
adaptive method to handle multiple boundary cases simultaneously and by choosing a sufficient number
of offline basis functions which can result in low errors at different contrast and grid sizes [2325]. Using
our recently proposed method and a special online basis construction for the oversampling regions, we
show that the errors can be reduced sufficiently by an appropriate choice of the oversampling regions.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce PDEs for mixed boundary conditions
and the notations of grids. In Section 3, the CEM-GMsFEM used in this paper and the procedure for
handling the mixed boundary conditions are presented. In Section 4, numerical analysis are given in
Section 4. In Section 5, we conduct the conclusions.
2 Problem formulation and fine grid approximation
In this section, we give mathematical models of anisotropic elastic materials with inhomogeneous Dirichlet
and Neumann boundary conditions. In the following equations, the domain Ω Rd(d= 2,3) denotes an
elastic body, and Ω denotes its boundary with Ω=ΓaΓb. The linear elasticity problem consists of
finding the displacement u, such that:
-div (σ(u)) = f, in Ω,
u=h, on Γa,
σ(u)·n=g, on Γb,
σ(u)=2µε (u) + λ∇ · uI,in Ω,
ε(u) = 1
2hu+ (u)Ti,in Ω,
(1)
where a body force fis considered in the domain Ω,
the surface force gis on the Neumann boundary part,
2
his on the Dirichlet boundary part,
σand εare stress and strain tensor,
nis the outward normal vector along Γb,
λand µare the Lam´e coefficients.
Then this inhomogeneous problem with Dirichlet conditions are incorporate through the decomposi-
tion ˜u=uhsuch that ˜u= 0 on Γa,i.e.,
˜uH1
a(Ω) := vH1(Ω) |v= 0 on Γa.
We rewrite the problem (1) in a variation formulation: find ˜uH1
a(Ω), such that
Z
σ(˜u) : grad (v) dx=Z
f·vdx+ZΓb
g·vdsZ
σ(h) : grad (v) dx, vH1
a(Ω) .(2)
Let φ1, ..., φnbe the basis set for H1
a(Ω) ,then ˜uhsatisfies
Ah˜uh=Lh,
where Ahis symmetric, positive definite matrix with
Ah,ij =a(φi, φj) = Z
σ(φi) : (φj) dx,
and Lhis a vector with i-th component
l(φi) = Z
f·φidx+ZΓb
g·φidsZ
σ(h) : grad (φi) dx.
Now we present GMsFEM. In this paper, we will develop and analyze the continuous Galerkin(CG) cou-
pling after the construction of local basis functions. In essence, the CG coupling will need vertextrased
local basis functions, then we give some mesh notations as follows. Let THbe a standard quadrilateral-
ization of the domain Ω, where we call the THcoarse grid, H > 0 being the coarse mesh size. Elements
of THare called coarse lattice blocks. The set of all coarse gird edges is denoted by EH, and the set
of all coarse gird nodes is denoted by SH.We let Tha fine mesh be the conformal refinement of the
quadrilateral and h > 0 the size of the fine mesh. We use Ehto denote the set of facets in Thwith
Eh=Eh
a∪ Eh
b. In addition, we denote the number of fine grid nodes by NHand the number of fine grid
blocks by N. If we consider a two-dimensional region of space [0,1] ×[0,1] with Nx and Ny partitions
in the xand ydirections respectively, and nx and ny partitions on each fine grid, we have the following
equation: NH=Nx N y nx ny, N = (N x nx + 1) (Ny ny + 1) .We note that the refinement for
the use of conformity is only intended to simplify the discussion of the method and is not a restriction
on it. As is shown in Figure 1, we define Ki,m as an oversampled domain on each Ki T H:
Ki,m =[Kj∈ T H|KjKi6= 0Ki,m1,
where Kiis the closure of Ki,and the initial value Ki,0=Kifor each element.
3
Figure 1: Illustration of the oversampling domain
3 The construction of the CEM-GMsFEM basis function
In this section, we describe the construction process of the CEM-GMsFEM, first constructing auxiliary
basis functions, and then moving on to multiscale basis functions throughout the oversampling area
utilizing constrained energy minimization. We also provide an innovative approach to inhomogeneous
elastic equations with natural and Dirichlet boundary conditions.
3.1 Auxiliary basis function
Let V(Kj) be the snapshot space on each coarse grid block Kj, and we use the method of the spectral
problem to solve the basis functions on Kj: find θi
j, φi
jR×V(Kj) such that for all vV(Kj),
aiφi
j, v=θi
jsiφi
j, v,vV(Kj),(3)
where
aiφi
j, v=ZKj
σφi
j:(v) dx, (4)
and
siφi
j, v=ZKj
˜κφi
j·vdx(5)
with ˜κ=PN1
i=1 (λ+ 2µ)χi· ∇χi, N1is the number of all coarse grids, {∇χi}N1
i=1 is a set of partition of
unity functions on the coarse grid.
Let the eigenvalues be in the following order:
θ1
jθ2
jθ3
j... θi
j...,
then the local auxiliary space Vaux (Kj) is defined by gjeigenvalue functions as following
Vaux (Kj) = span φi
j|1jgj.(6)
We remark that
V=
N1
M
j=1
V(Kj), Vaux =
N1
M
j=1
Vaux (Kj).
Let sφi
j, v=PN1
j=1 siφi
j, v,we define that ψVis φi
j-orthogonal if
sψ, φi
j=(1, j06=j,
0, j0=j.
4
In addition, we define a projection operator π=PN1
i=1 πifrom space Vto Vaux by
πi(v) =
gi
X
j=1
siv, φi
j
siφi
j, φi
jφi
j.
3.2 Offline multiscale basis functions
In practice, many functions are discontinuous in the domain, so after constructing the auxiliary basis func-
tions, we consider an oversampling method to extend these functions that are discontinuous in the domain
onto the oversampling region Kj,m. For φi
jH1
a(Kj,m) := vH1(Kj,m)|v= 0 on ΓaKj,m,we
give the relaxed CEM-GMsFEM: find ξI,i
cem,j,m,such that
ξI,i
cem,j,m = argmin a(ξ, ξ) + sπξ φi
j, πξ φi
j|ξH1
a(Kj,m).(7)
We could also constrain the above problem:
ξII,i
cem,j,m = argmin a(ξ, ξ)|ξH1
a(Kj,m), ξ is φi
j-orthogonal.(8)
In the following, we describe the constructed form of CEM-GMsFEM in two parts.
Part.1. Relaxed CEM-GMsFEM
Note the problem Eq.(7) is equivalent to the local problem: find ξI,i
cem,j,m H1
a(Kj,m),such that
aξI,i
cem,j,m, z1+sπξI,i
cem,j,m, π (z1)=sφi
j, π (z1),z1H1
a(Kj,m).(9)
Then, we obtain the following matrix representation from the above formulation
Az1+Mz2MT
z2z1=Mz2,(10)
where
Az1:= (a(ξi, ξj)) ,Mz2:= s((qi, qi)) ,
θ, z1,z2are vectors of coefficients for the approximations, and Mz2is the internally reordered matrix
of Mz2.
Finally we note that the global multiscale space is defined by
Vcem := span nξI,i
cem,j,m|1igj,1jN1o.
The relaxed CEM-GMsFEM bases are defined by:
ξI,i
cem,j = argmin na(ξ, ξ) + sπξ φI,i
cem,j , πξ φi
j|ξH1
a(Ω)o,(11)
which is equivalent to the following problem: find ξI,i
cem,j V, such that
aξI,i
cem,j , z1+sπξI,i
cem,j , π (z1)=sφi
j, π (z1),z1H1
a(Ω) .(12)
Furthermore, we define the global space of multiscale basis functions as
Vglo = span nξI,i
cem,j |1igj,1jN1o.
Part.2. Constrained CEM-GMsFEM
Note the problem Eq.(8) is equivalent to the local problem: find ξII,i
cem,j,m H1
a(Kj,m),
θVaux (Kj,m) such that
aξII,i
cem,j,m, z1+s(z1, θ) = 0,z1H1
a(Kj,m),
sξII,i
cem,j,m φi
j, z2= 0,z2Vaux (Kj,m).
(13)
5
摘要:

AmultiscalemethodforinhomogeneouselasticproblemswithhighcontrastcoecientsZhongqianWang1;,ChangqingYe1,EricT.Chung11DepartmentofMathematics,TheChineseUniversityofHongKong,HongKongSpecialAdministrativeRegionAbstract:Inthispaper,wedeveloptheconstrainedenergyminimizinggeneralizedmultiscale niteelement...

展开>> 收起<<
A multiscale method for inhomogeneous elastic problems with high contrast coecients Zhongqian Wang1 Changqing Ye1 Eric T. Chung1.pdf

共23页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:23 页 大小:1.12MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-30

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 23
客服
关注