dependencies between brain regions and thus gain a greater understanding of brain functioning (Fris-
ton et al., 1994; Hutchison et al., 2013). Simple approaches to studying FC rely on readily available
measures of temporal correlation, such as the partial correlations between two brain regions after
conditioning upon all other regions (Fornito et al., 2013; Friston, 2011). Such metrics assume that
interactions between brain regions are constant in space and time throughout the fMRI session (static
connectivity, Li et al., 2008). Rather, neuroscientists have become increasingly aware that functional
connectivity is dynamic and fluctuating, i.e. non-stationary, and that studying the dynamics of FC
is crucial for improving our understanding of human brain function (Hutchison et al., 2013; Vidaurre
et al., 2017; Lurie et al., 2020). The term “chronnectome" has been introduced to describe the growing
focus on identifying time-varying, but reoccurring, patterns of coupling among brain regions (Calhoun
et al., 2014).
Recent studies have highlighted how subjects are more likely to experience particular connectivity
states when some underlying physiological conditions are present. For example, Chand et al. (2020)
have investigated the association between heart rate variations and FC. Similarly, in a sleep fMRI
study, El-Baba et al. (2019) have shown that transitions between connectivity states slow as subjects
fall into deeper sleep stages. As a further example, Kucyi et al. (2017) have described how connectivity
dynamics are associated with attentiveness in a pencil-tapping task. These studies, among others, have
motivated the need for models that provide a better understanding of how the transitions between
different functional connectivity states are modulated by internal or external conditions measured
during the course of an experiment. In the experimental study we consider in this manuscript, we have
available fMRI data collected together with pupillometry measurements. Pupil dilation has become
increasingly popular in cognitive psychology to measure cognitive processing and resource allocation. It
is believed that the changes in pupil diameter reflect brain state fluctuations driven by neuromodulatory
systems (Sobczak et al., 2021). For example, the pupil dilates more under conditions of higher attention
(Siegle et al., 2003). Thus, pupil dilation measurements can be seen as an index of effort exertion,
task demand, or difficulty in an fMRI experiment (van der Wel and van Steenbergen, 2018). Thus, it
is of interest to understand how pupil dilation is associated with an increased probability of particular
connectivity states experienced by a subject during an experiment (Martin et al., 2021).
Many of the commonly used approaches for studying dynamic connectivity rely on multi-step infer-
ences. For example, in Calhoun et al. (2014) the fMRI time courses are first segmented by a sequence
of sliding windows, and then precision matrices are estimated in each window. Finally, k-means clus-
tering methods are used to identify re-occurring patterns of FC states. Post-hoc analyses may be
employed to assess the association of the estimated dynamic connectivity states with other available
measurements, like pupil dilation measurements (Haimovici et al., 2017). However, the arbitrary choice
of the window length and the offset may lead to spurious dynamic profiles and poor estimates of cor-
relations for each brain state (Lindquist et al., 2014; Shakil et al., 2016). Improvements were proposed
by Cribben et al. (2012, 2013) and Xu and Lindquist (2015), who developed change point detection
methods to recursively partition the fMRI time series into stable contiguous segments where networks
of partial correlations are estimated by employing the graphical lasso of (Friedman et al., 2008). These
methods do not require pre-specifying the segment lengths and can detect the temporal persistence
of the functional networks. However, they do not account for the possibility of states being revisited
and hence do not conform to the idea that the chronnectome exhibits recurrent patterns of dynamic
coupling between brain regions of interest (ROIs).
Other model-based approaches to dynamic connectivity consider the set of ROIs as the nodes (or
vertices) of an underlying graph and employ homogeneous hidden Markov models (HMMs) to detect
2