
2 QIWEI FENG, BIN HAN AND PETER MINEV
exacerbated if the jumps of the permeability coefficient across the different interfaces are very large
(of several orders of magnitude). Details of the physical background of the elliptic interface problem
can be found in [28].
In practice, usually the permeability variation occurs on scales that are very small as compared to
the size of the medium, and therefore the solution of the interface problem is highly oscillatory. This
causes the appearance of the so-called pollution effect in the error of its numerical approximation. In
order to obtain a reasonable low-order numerical solution to such problems one needs to employ a very
fine, possibly nonuniform grid, that captures the small scale features. Therefore, the development of
higher-order compact approximations can help to reduce the computational costs. Compared to the
finite element or finite volume methods, the FDM does not require the integration of highly-oscillatory
or discontinuous functions. Furthermore, a compact 9-point scheme (in 2D) yields a sparse linear
system that can be solved very efficiently.
Finally we should mention, that even in the relatively simple case of elliptic interface problems
involving a smooth non-intersecting interface of coefficient jumps, the theoretical proof of convergence
of the various proposed finite difference schemes is usually missing. The only exceptions are presented
in [21] using discrete maximum principle for a second order scheme, and [12] using numerically verified
discrete maximum principle for a fourth order scheme. The compact 9-point schemes considered in
the present paper possess the M-matrix property, that guarantees the discrete maximum principle
for the numerical solution. In turn, this property greatly facilitates the proof of their convergence
rate.
In this paper we develop numerical approximations to the following elliptic cross-interface problem:
Given the domain Ω := (l1, l2)×(l3, l4)with l1, l2, l3, l4∈R, then consider:
−∇ · a∇u=fin Ω\Γ,
[u] = φpon Γpfor p= 1,2,3,4,
[a∇u·~n] = ψpon Γpfor p= 1,2,3,4,
u=gon ∂Ω,
(1.1)
where the cross-interface Γis given by Γ := Γ1∪Γ2∪Γ3∪Γ4∪ {(ξ, ζ)}with
Γ1:= {ξ}×(ζ, l4),Γ2:= {ξ}×(l3, ζ),Γ3:= (ξ, l2)×{ζ},Γ4:= (l1, ξ)×{ζ},(ξ, ζ)∈Ω.
As usual, that the square brackets here denote the jump of the corresponding function, i.e. for
(ξ, y)∈Γpwith p= 1,2 (on the vertical line of the cross-interface Γ),
[u](ξ, y) := lim
x→ξ+u(x, y)−lim
x→ξ−u(x, y),[a∇u·~n](ξ, y) := lim
x→ξ+a(x, y)∂u
∂x(x, y)−lim
x→ξ−a(x, y)∂u
∂x(x, y);
while for (x, ζ)∈Γpwith p= 3,4 (i.e., on the horizontal line of the cross-interface Γ),
[u](x, ζ) := lim
y→ζ+u(x, y)−lim
y→ζ−u(x, y),[a∇u·~n](x, ζ) := lim
y→ζ+a(x, y)∂u
∂y (x, y)−lim
y→ζ−a(x, y)∂u
∂y (x, y).
Note that the interface curve Γ divides the domain Ω into 4 subdomains:
Ω1:= (l1, ξ)×(ζ, l4),Ω2:= (ξ, l2)×(ζ, l4),Ω3:= (ξ, l2)×(l3, ζ),Ω4:= (l1, ξ)×(l3, ζ).
See Fig. 1 for an illustration, where ap:= aχΩp,fp:= fχΩp, and up:= uχΩpfor p= 1,2,3,4.
To derive a compact 9-point scheme that approximates the cross-interface problem (1.1), we assume
that:
(A1) apis a positive constant in Ωp.
(A2) The restriction of the solution upand of the source term fphas uniformly continuous partial
derivatives of (total) orders up to seven and five, respectively, in each Ωpfor p= 1,2,3,4.
(A3) The essentially one-dimensional functions φpand ψpin (1.1) on the interface Γphave uniformly
continuous derivatives of orders up to seven and six respectively for p= 1,2,3,4.