Crowdsourcing and Sidewalk Data A Preliminary Study on the Trustworthiness of OpenStreetMap Data in the US Kazi Shahrukh Omar1 Gustavo Moreira1 Daniel Hodczak1

2025-04-27 0 0 9.28MB 7 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Crowdsourcing and Sidewalk Data:
A Preliminary Study on the Trustworthiness of OpenStreetMap Data in the US
Kazi Shahrukh Omar1, Gustavo Moreira1, Daniel Hodczak1,
Maryam Hosseini2, Fabio Miranda1
1University of Illinois Chicago, 2New York University
Seattle
New York City
Chicago
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
No sidewalk
info
Trustworthiness
0
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of the average trustworthiness of roads with sidewalk information and sidewalk geometries in Chicago, Seattle
and New York City.
Abstract
Sidewalks play a pivotal role in urban mobility of ev-
eryday life. Ideally, sidewalks provide a safe walkway
for pedestrians, link public transportation facilities, and
equip people with routing and navigation services. How-
ever, there is a scarcity of open sidewalk data, which not
only impacts the accessibility and walkability of cities but
also limits policymakers in generating insightful measures
to improve the current state of pedestrian facilities. As one
of the most famous crowdsourced data repositories, Open-
StreetMap (OSM) could aid the lack of open sidewalk data
to a large extent. However, completeness and quality of
OSM data have long been a major issue. In this paper,
we offer a preliminary study on the availability and trust-
worthiness of OSM sidewalk data. First, we compare OSM
sidewalk data coverage in over 50 major cities in the United
States. Then, we select three major cities (Seattle, Chicago,
and New York City) to further analyze the completeness of
sidewalk data and its features, and to compute a trustwor-
thiness index leveraging historical OSM sidewalk data.
1. Introduction
Sidewalks are arguably the most important pedestrian-
dedicated public spaces. They are the focal point of cities
at the human scale, where the most widely used and en-
vironmentally sustainable form of transportation (walk-
ing/rolling) takes place [1,2]. Sidewalks can significantly
impact the everyday life of people, specifically for those
relying on such infrastructure as the primary means of ac-
cessing public spaces [37] and public transit [8]. Well-
designed sidewalks can also support local businesses and
promote economic activities [9,10]. Despite their promi-
nent role in various pedestrian-level analysis, the available
public data on sidewalks is significantly scarce and lim-
ited in time and geographical coverage [11]. Ironically,
data collection and monitoring of motorized travel patterns
and infrastructure have been practiced since the 1950s [12],
and the collected data has been extensively used in trans-
portation planning research, while collecting pedestrian-
level data has only recently received some attention [13].
Furthermore, the existing datasets are collected mainly by
resourceful cities, with substantial variation in the extent of
data and attributes, and inconsistent methods from place to
place. Such problems create significant barriers to conduct-
ing comparative studies, or data integration, across admin-
istrative borders [1315]. Majority of the sidewalk invento-
ries still lack important feature such as width, surface ma-
terials, curb ramps, tactile surface indicators, audio signals,
etc., which are essential for specific mobility needs [15].
This lack of sidewalk data not only affects accessible rout-
ing in cities but also impacts how urban planners and pol-
icymakers could scrutinize mobility issues and the condi-
1
arXiv:2210.02350v1 [cs.CY] 5 Oct 2022
Figure 2. Comparing the coverage of sidewalk data in OSM for 54 cities in the US. Left: percentage of roads with sidewalk information.
Right: ratio between sidewalks and roads. The majority of cities have less than 20% of roads with sidewalk information. In addition, only
Seattle and Detroit have a sidewalk to road ratio above 0.4.
tion of sidewalks to make informed decisions [16]. Ongo-
ing projects [4,1722] propose to standardize and improve
sidewalk data coverage. Even so, researchers primarily rely
on crowdsourced OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, the largest
geospatial open-data initiative, with data covering not only
streets and roads, but also buildings, points of interest, and
other geographic entities [23].
Considering OSM’s importance in sidewalk studies, our
primary goal is to assess the coverage and trustworthiness
of OSM sidewalk data. While previous studies [24,25] have
assessed completeness of sidewalks, we propose to also as-
sess the trustworthiness of the data by analyzing its history
and provenance. Concretely, we compare the sidewalk cov-
erage of OSM in 54 major cities in the United States and
further expand our analysis in three major cities (Seattle,
Chicago and New York City) with the spatial trustworthi-
ness of the data. We then highlight possible research direc-
tions to mitigate some of the identified problems.
2. Related Work
OSM data has been used in various studies spanning
different fields, including routing [26,27], location-based
services [2830], traffic and transportation [3134], energy
modeling [35,36], population estimation [37,38], 3D city
modeling [3941], land cover use [42,43], and emergency
response management [44,45]. Ongoing initiatives to im-
prove sidewalk data, including Accessmap [18] and Open-
Sidewalks [17], also utilize data from OSM. However, qual-
ity of OSM data has always been a major concern for both
research and industrial purposes [4654]. To tackle this
problem, studies have been conducted to evaluate the qual-
ity and completeness of OSM data, focusing on different en-
tities, such as roads [5557], buildings [49,50], and points
of interest [58]. Properly assessing the quality of OSM
data is a challenge, given that traditional approaches rely
on the availability of official data (though even such data
might have problems, including slow update rate). Alterna-
tive approaches then analyze the evolution of the data itself,
assessing how the number of users editing, confirmations
from different users, number of versions and rollbacks con-
tribute to the quality of OSM data [5966]. Considering
this, we propose to evaluate the use of trustworthiness as an
index for OSM sidewalk data.
3. Study Area and OpenStreetMap Data
Between 2001 and 2019, the US built-up land - build-
ings, roads, and other infrastructures - increased by more
than 14,000 square miles of new developments [67]. Today,
more than 80% of the US population (around 309 million
people) lives in urban areas [68]. Subsequently, there has
been a growth in the availability of OSM data across the
US, capturing its complex and diverse built environment.
Our study first analyzes the availability of OSM sidewalk
Year
Sidewalk to road ratio
Year
Roads with sidewalk info. (%)
Growth of roads with sidewalk info. over the years
Growth of sidewalk geometries over the years
New York City
Chicago
Seattle
New York City
Chicago
Seattle
Figure 3. Growth of OSM sidewalk data in Chicago, Seattle, and
NYC over the years. Top: growth of roads with sidewalk informa-
tion. Bottom: growth of sidewalk / road ratio.
2
摘要:

CrowdsourcingandSidewalkData:APreliminaryStudyontheTrustworthinessofOpenStreetMapDataintheUSKaziShahrukhOmar1,GustavoMoreira1,DanielHodczak1,MaryamHosseini2,FabioMiranda11UniversityofIllinoisChicago,2NewYorkUniversityFigure1.Spatialdistributionoftheaveragetrustworthinessofroadswithsidewalkinformatio...

展开>> 收起<<
Crowdsourcing and Sidewalk Data A Preliminary Study on the Trustworthiness of OpenStreetMap Data in the US Kazi Shahrukh Omar1 Gustavo Moreira1 Daniel Hodczak1.pdf

共7页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:7 页 大小:9.28MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-27

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 7
客服
关注