
Domain wall melting across a defect
Luca Capizzi1, Stefano Scopa1, Federico Rottoli1and Pasquale Calabrese1,2
1SISSA and INFN, via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy
2International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), I-34151, Trieste, Italy
Abstract
– We study the melting of a domain wall in a free-fermionic chain with a localised
impurity. We find that the defect enhances quantum correlations in such a way that even the
smallest scatterer leads to a linear growth of the entanglement entropy contrasting the logarithmic
behaviour in the clean system. Exploiting the hydrodynamic approach and the quasiparticle
picture, we provide exact predictions for the evolution of the entanglement entropy for arbitrary
bipartitions. In particular, the steady production of pairs at the defect gives rise to non-local
correlations among distant points. We also characterise the subleading logarithmic corrections,
highlighting some universal features.
Introduction
– A single localised impurity or defect can
alter the global structure of a many-body quantum system,
as well known from the textbook examples of Anderson
orthogonality catastrophe [1] and the Kane-Fisher model
[2,3]. In the latter, it has been shown that for repulsive
interactions, the electrons are completely reflected by even
the smallest scatterer, leading to a truly insulating weak
link disconnecting the two halves. Conversely for attractive
bulk interactions, the weak link is irrelevant, i.e., it is
washed away at large scales. As a consequence free fermions
represent the most interesting system in which the defect
is marginal and there is a line of fixed points characterised
by the the defect strength [4,5].
In recent years, the physics of impurities in one-
dimensional (1D) free-fermionic systems has been investi-
gated a lot through the lens of entanglement. The marginal-
ity of the defect is reflected into a logarithmic scaling of
the entanglement entropy with a prefactor that depends
continuously on the defect strength [6
–
20]. Overall, thanks
to all these studies nowadays we have a rather complete
understanding of the physics of defects in equilibrium free
fermionic systems. The same is definitively not true when
the free fermionic chain is driven out of equilibrium; in
fact, in spite of several works about the non-equilibrium
behaviour across one defect (see, e.g., Refs. [21
–
31]), a
complete understanding is still far because of the many
different ways of driving a system away from equilibrium.
In this manuscript, we prepare an initial state with a
domain wall localised at the defect and we let it melt.
Without the defect, this is a protocol that has been studied
intensively in the free fermionic literature [32
–
45] and it
represents a case study for the application of hydrodynam-
ics to non-equilibrium quantum systems (recently adapted
also to interacting integrable models [46,47] with the gen-
eralised hydrodynamics formalism [48,49]). Anyhow, the
presence of the defect is expected to alter dramatically
the evolution at a qualitative level. The density, the cur-
rents, and other local quantities have been characterised in
Ref. [50] where the emergence of a local non-equilibrium
stationary state (NESS) has been rigorously established.
However, little is known for the entanglement entropy,
whose behaviour is affected, as any other non-local ob-
servable, by non-local correlations generated by the defect.
Some lattice results have been derived for the domain wall
melting with defect in Ref. [21], and another important
step forward has been done by Fraenkel and Goldstein
[51,52] in a slightly different context, but a general scheme
to describe non-local correlations is still missing. In this
regard, it is very natural to wonder whether even a small
defect alters substantially the domain wall melting. As we
shall see, this is the case.
The model and the quench protocol
– We consider
a 1D chain of free spinless fermions with 2
N
sites and
with nearest-neighbour hopping with a defect of strength
λ
located at the center of the system. The Hamiltonian is
ˆ
H=
N
X
i,j=−N+1
hi,j ˆc†
iˆcj(1)
with
hi,j =−1
2(δi,j+1 +δi+1,j ),∀i, j 6= 0,1 (2)
p-1
arXiv:2210.02162v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 3 Feb 2023