
LOW ENERGY SCATTERING ASYMPTOTICS FOR PLANAR OBSTACLES 5
resolvent R0(λ), using a resolvent identity due to Vodev [Vod14], and techniques in part based on
Vodev’s work in [Vod99].
Our techniques can be applied to quite general compactly supported perturbations of −∆ on
R2, far beyond the specific, classical setting considered here, that of the Dirichlet problem on an
exterior domain. In a companion paper we will address the more general case. As demonstrated
already in [BGD88,JeNe01] for the case of Schr¨odinger operators on R2, different kinds of singular
behavior of the resolvent near zero can then appear.
We deduce the series for the scattering matrix and scattering phase of Theorems 2and 3in
Section 3, by inserting the resolvent expansion (1.1) into the formulas (1.4) and (1.7). Section 4
contains some related results for the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator.
Appendix Acollects background on polar and nonpolar sets, Appendix Bcontains a lemma
about series with logarithmic terms, and Appendix Ccontains formulas for the scattering matrix
and scattering phase of a disk; see also Section 5.2 of [HaZe99] and Section 3 of [GMWZ22].
The presentation of Theorems 1,2, and 3is self-contained, based on standard complex and
functional analysis, except for a few ingredients. For the resolvent expansions we quote the series
(2.1) and (2.2) for the free resolvent. For the scattering matrix and scattering phase we quote
Petkov and Zworski’s formula (1.4). Our analysis of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator in Section 4
requires more, namely mapping properties from [GMZ07], results on solutions of boundary value
problems from [McL00], and results on analyticity of eigenvalues for which [ReSi78] is a reference.
1.4. Notation and conventions.
•C∞
0(U) is the set of functions in C∞(U) with compact support in U.
•O⊂R2is compact and Ω = R2\O. We say Ois polar if C∞
0(Ω) is dense in H1(R2). The Dirichlet
Laplacian is −∆: D → L2(Ω), with D={u∈H1
0(Ω): ∆u∈L2(Ω)}, and ∆ := ∂2
x1+∂2
x2.
•The Dirichlet resolvent R(λ) is defined for Im λ > 0 to be the operator which takes f∈L2(Ω) to
the unique u∈ D solving (−∆−λ2)u=f. For every χ∈C∞
0(R2), the product χR(λ)χcontinues
meromorphically from the upper half plane to Λ, the Riemann surface of the logarithm. The free
resolvent R0(λ) is defined in the same way but with L2(Ω) replaced by L2(R2) and Dreplaced
by H2(R2). See Sections 2.1 and 2.3 for a review of these facts.
•The mapping Λ →Cgiven by λ7→ log λis bijective, with the upper half plane Im λ > 0
identified with the subset of Λ where arg λ= Im log λtakes values in (0, π).
•The mapping λ7→ ¯
λon Λ is defined by |¯
λ|=|λ|and arg ¯
λ=−arg λ.
•The product of a function χon R2and a function fon Ω is the function χf on Ω obtained by
ignoring the values of χon R2\Ω.
•L2
c(Ω) is the set of functions f∈L2(Ω) such that χf =ffor some χ∈C∞
0(R2). Other function
spaces with a ‘c’ subscript are defined analogously.
• Dloc is the set of functions fon Ω such that χf ∈ D for all χ∈C∞
0(R2). Other function spaces
with a ‘loc’ subscript are defined analogously.
•Gis the unique harmonic function in Dloc such that log |x| − G(x) is bounded as |x| → ∞. We
construct Gand prove its uniqueness in Lemma 2.6.
•C(O) = lim|x|→∞ log |x| − G(x).
•γis Euler’s constant, given by γ=−Γ0(1) = 0.577 . . . .
•a= log 2 −γ−C(O) + πi
2.