Patterned bilayer graphene as a tunable strongly correlated system Z. E. Krixand O. P. Sushkov School of Physics University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 and

2025-04-26 0 0 936.02KB 13 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Patterned bilayer graphene as a tunable, strongly correlated system
Z. E. Krixand O. P. Sushkov
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 and
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Low-Energy Electronics Technologies,
University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
(Dated: October 13, 2022)
Recent observations of superconductivity in Moire graphene1have lead to an intense interest in
that system, with subsequent studies revealing a more complex phase diagram including correlated
insulators and ferromagnetic phases. Here we propose an alternate system, electrostatically pat-
terned bilayer graphene (PBG), in which a supermodulation is induced via metallic gates rather
than the moire effect. We show that, by varying either the gap or the modulation strength, bilayer
graphene can be tuned into the strongly correlated regime. Further calculations show that this is not
possible in monolayer graphene. We present a general technique for addressing Coulomb screening
of the periodic potential and demonstrate that this system is experimentally feasible.
I. INTRODUCTION
Superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene1occurs
at a twist angle which turns the lowest lying energy states
into a flat band2. More generally, strongly correlated
phases due to flat band physics arise in a broad range
of materials. Observations of superconductivity1,3–6,
correlated insulators3–5,7–9, ferromagnetism10,11 and ne-
matic order8,12,13 have been reported across the family
of twisted graphene systems. This includes twisted bi-
layer graphene1, twisted trilayer graphene6, and twisted
double bilayer graphene13. Flat bands also arise in
twisted TMDCs14 and kagome systems which exhibit
superconductivity, ferromagnetism, and charge density
waves15–20.
Given the high level of interest in strongly corre-
lated phases arising from flat band systems, particularly
twisted bilayer graphene, the present work proposes an
alternative graphene-based system which is fully tunable
and contains a well-defined, isolated flat band. The sys-
tem we consider is a graphene bilayer with no twist an-
gle and a patterned electrostatic gate a vertical distance,
z, from the bilayer. For brevity we refer to this sys-
tem as patterned bilayer graphene (PBG). The guiding
idea is to restructure the bare energy bands of bilayer
graphene via periodic electrostatic gating rather than
with a twist-induced Moire superlattice. Conceptually,
this is a continuation of our previous work on semicon-
ductor artificial crystals21, which are less efficient than
PBG at generating a strong modulation. A major ad-
vantage of this approach is that it bypasses the issue of
twist-angle disorder22 (i.e. long-range spatial variation
of the twist angle). The Moire flat band occurs at a pre-
cise value of twist angle (θ1.1°) and a modest amount
of twist-disorder (<
10 %) can destroy this band23. We
demonstrate that PBG has no equivalent fine-tuning or
disorder problem.
The central advantage of our system is its controlla-
bility. A designed superlattice potential induced by pat-
terned electrostatic gating can have any desired lattice
symmetry (e.g. square, triangular, honeycomb24, Lieb,
or kagome) and lattice constants as small as 40 nm25. It
is also possible to tune both the strength of the super-
modulation and the particle density independently25,26.
In contrast, Moire graphene superlattices have a trian-
gular symmetry which is fixed by the crystal structure
of graphene. The superlattice constant, a13 nm, is
also fixed by the flat band condition, θ1.1°and tun-
ing the superlattice strength is only possible by applying
hydrostatic pressure4. Some prior works have focused
on patterning monolayer graphene, either by etching
holes directly into the graphene sheet27 or by patterned
electrostatic gating25,28. Ref.27 demonstrates, theoreti-
cally, that patterning introduces an energy gap in the
graphene dispersion while Refs.25,28 measure magneto-
transport properties of a real device and show that the
result of patterning is essentially a correction to single
particle physics. There is not, however, the possibility
for generating an isolated flat band or strongly correlated
phases in these monolayer graphene systems.
Our results are derived from band structure calcu-
lations in a continuum, bilayer graphene model with
imposed superlattice potential. We find that bilayer
graphene can be driven into the Mott regime by ap-
plication of a suffciently strong band gap and potential
modulation. This occurs because a flat band develops
in the lowest-energy band of the PBG dispersion. By
detuning either the band gap or potential modulation
the system can be tuned out of the Mott regime while
keeping the total electron density fixed. Within the flat
band it is possible to mimic the dispersion of many dif-
ferent two-dimensional lattices including square, triangu-
lar, kagome, and Lieb, by varying the symmetry of the
patterned gate. We show, using an analogous calcula-
tion, that it is not possible to generate a flat band in
monolayer graphene. Lastly, we study electron-electron
screening in bilayer graphene. Current techniques are not
able to address a system with both an unbounded dis-
persion and a strong potential modulation; we develop a
general technique to address Coulomb screening in this
limit. The technique we develop is general and could
also be applied to, for example, the problem of impurity
screening in bilayer graphene. We show that screening of
the periodic potential is strong but can be overcome by
arXiv:2210.05827v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 11 Oct 2022
2
FIG. 1: Sketch of the two Brillouin zones. The larger is that
of the underlying bilayer graphene system and the smaller is
that of the artificial crystal. Since we use an expansion about
the Kpoints of the bilayer graphene BZ, the artificial BZ is
centered at a Kpoint. The inset shows the artificial crystal
in real space.
Bilayer Graphene BZ
Articial BZ
K' K
Γ
experimentally realistic gate voltages. Our results show
that patterned bilayer graphene is an experimentally vi-
able way to engineer an isolated flat with almost complete
control over the underlying effective Hubbard model.
II. THEORETICAL TECHNIQUES
Our starting point is a plain bilayer graphene sheet
with external, perpendicular electric field, E, inducing an
energy gap, ∆. The relationship between field and gap is
roughly |E| ∝ ∆, where the constant of proportionality
is such that a displacement field of 1 V nm1leads to a
gap = 100 meV.29 We find that the value of the gap
is important but does not need to be finely tuned, we
discuss conditions on ∆ below. The low-energy effective
Hamiltonian for a single valley of bilayer graphene is30
HBLG =
/2vp0γ
vp+/2 0 0
0 0 /2vp
γ0vp+/2
(1)
Where v1×106m s1is the Fermi velocity of
monolayer graphene, γ0.38 eV is the coupling be-
tween graphene layers, and the operator p±is defined
by p±=px±ipy. These values are taken from Ref.30.
The Hamiltonian is composed of 2 ×2 blocks. Each
diagonal block is the Hamiltonian of a single graphene
layer, and each layer has a different energy shift ±/2
depending on its position in the external field. The off-
diagonal blocks, which couple the two layers, arise from
the simplest kind of interlayer hopping, between two car-
bon atoms which are vertically aligned: γis the matrix
element for this hopping. One can also include terms in
the Hamiltonian which describe longer-range interlayer
hopping (these are denoted by γ3and γ4in Ref.30). As
discussed in Ref.30 they contribute to trigonal warping
and particle-antiparticle asymmetry of the band disper-
sion. These additional terms are secondary to the ma-
jor terms, vand γ, and, for the sake of physical trans-
parency, we neglect them here. In the limit |ε|  γ,
the two low-energy bands which arise from Eqn. 1 are
roughly quadratic: ε(p) = ±p(p2/2m)2+ ∆2/4, where
the effective mass is m=γ/2v20.03.
Over the top of this Hamiltonian we wish to introduce
a spatially modulated electrostatic potential, U(r), due
to the patterned gating. Suppose, first, that the periodic
potential defined at the gate is given by
Ugate(r) = WX
G
eiG·rUG
Where the vectors, G, are the reciprocal lattice vec-
tors of the artificial superlattice and Wis a parameter
taking dimensions of energy which controls the strength
of the superlattice. In our calculation, the dimensionless
parameters, UG, define a muffin-tin shaped, periodic po-
tential with square-lattice symmetry (see the inset to Fig.
1). In this case Wis equal to the total variation in poten-
tial energy from minimum to maximum, the “height” of
the muffin-tin. For concreteness we study W > 0, which
corresponds to an array of anti-dots. The opposite limit
W < 0 is very similar and we discuss this below. The po-
tential, U(r), at the plane of the bilayer graphene sheet
is then
U(r) = WX
G
eiG·reGzUG(2)
Where zis the vertical distance between the pat-
terned gate and the bilayer. This exponential suppression
of the higher harmonics follows directly from Poisson’s
equation. For a square lattice, the first harmonic has
G=g= 2π/a, where ais the superlattice period. We
choose parameters a= 80 nm and z= 10 nm which are
reasonable from an experimental standpoint. The supres-
sion of the second harmonic relative to the first is then
egz 0.5 meaning that higher harmonics should not
be neglected. For a smaller lattice constant, a= 40 nm,
egz 0.2 and so higher harmonics are slightly less sig-
nificant. Given this periodic potential the total Hamilto-
nian becomes
HP BG =HBLG +U(r)
The matrix structure of U(r) is trivial, it is a 4 ×4
identity matrix. Strictly speaking there should also be a
spatially varying correction to the gap, ∆, due to each
graphene layer being a slightly different distance from
the patterned gate. This correction, however, produces
a small effect relative to the major contribution, U(r),
3
and can be neglected. Note that the applied, constant
field (which induces ∆) will give a similar, diagonal con-
tribution to the Hamiltonian. Since that contribution is
spatially invariant, it simply shifts all energy levels by the
same amount, and can be left out of the Hamiltonian.
Since the artificial superlattice period, a, is larger than
the period of the graphene lattice and since we are focus-
ing on a single valley, our approach amounts to defining a
smaller, artificial Brillouin zone (either square or hexag-
onal) around one of the vertices of the original bilayer
graphene Brillouin zone. This is sketched in figure 1.
The energy levels of the Hamiltonian, HP BG, can be
obtained exactly by numerical diagonalisation. We must
first compute the matrix elements of HP BG in a par-
ticular basis. For simplicity, we choose basis vectors,
FIG. 2: Evolution of dispersion from W= 0 meV to W=
30 meV. In each panel a= 80 nm, ∆ = 15 meV, R= 15 nm
and z= 10 nm. At W= 0 meV we have the bare BLG
dispersion band-folded into the artificial Brillouin zone. By
W= 30 meV a single, flat band (width 0.5 meV) has sep-
arated from the rest of the hole bands. Points around the
artificial Brillouin zone are defined in the inset.
W = 0 meV W = 15 meV
W = 30 meV
K
M¡
Artificial
BZ
|k+G, ii, defined by
|k+G, ii=1
Aei(k+G)·r|ii
(|ii)j=δij , i, j = 1,··· ,4
Here |iiis a 4-tuple, Gis a reciprocal lattice vector of
the superlattice and kis the quasi-momentum, which sits
somewhere within the artificial Brillouin zone. The nor-
malisation factor, A, is just the total area of the sample.
For example, at i= 1, we have
|1i=
1
0
0
0
The matrix elements of HP BG are then
hk+G, i|HP BG|k+G0, ji=hi|HBLG(k+G)|jiδG,G0
+δi,j W UGG0e−|GG0|z
In HBLG(k) the operator, p±, is replaced by the com-
plex number, k±=kx±iky. The matrix elements of the
potential are given by,
UG= 2πR2
Acell
J1(|G|R)
|G|R
Where Ris the radius of a single anti-dot, taken to
be R= 15 nm in our calculations, and Acell is the unit
cell area of the artificial crystal; J1is a Bessel function
of the first kind. The only differences between square an
triangular lattices are the choice of reciprocal lattice vec-
tors, G, and the size of Acell in the above equation. To
diagonalise this Hamiltonian numerically we must make
the set of basis vectors finite by choosing a maximal G
vector. In practice, we simply increase the size of the ba-
sis until the energy levels or eigenvectors converge. The
result of this procedure is a set of energy levels, εn(k),
and eigenvectors, ψn,k(r), each being a function of the
quasi-momentum, k, of the artificial superlattice. The
band index can take values n=±1,±2,··· with the
charge neutrality point occurring between n=1 and
n= +1. Each band, n, is degenerate across valleys and
spins and contains a number of particles, n0= 4/Acell,
corresponding to complete filling of one artificial Bril-
louin zone (accounting for spin and valley degeneracy).
At a= 80 nm we have n0= 6.25 ×1010 cm2, while at
a= 40 nm we have n0= 2.5×1011 cm2.
The parameter Whas been defined at the patterned
gate. This allows us to fairly compare the strength of a
square lattice with that of a kagome lattice (for example).
Still, it is useful to have a general idea of the amplitude of
the potential at the 2DEG. Looking at the first harmonic
only, this quantity is
摘要:

Patternedbilayergrapheneasatunable,stronglycorrelatedsystemZ.E.KrixandO.P.SushkovSchoolofPhysics,UniversityofNewSouthWales,Sydney2052andAustralianResearchCouncilCentreofExcellenceinLow-EnergyElectronicsTechnologies,UniversityofNewSouthWales,Sydney2052,Australia(Dated:October13,2022)Recentobservatio...

展开>> 收起<<
Patterned bilayer graphene as a tunable strongly correlated system Z. E. Krixand O. P. Sushkov School of Physics University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 and.pdf

共13页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:13 页 大小:936.02KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-26

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 13
客服
关注