The evolution of AI approaches for motor imagery EEG-based BCIs Aurora Saibene120000000244058234 Silvia Corchs230000000217398110

2025-04-26 0 0 377.03KB 16 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
The evolution of AI approaches for motor
imagery EEG-based BCIs
Aurora Saibene1,2[0000000244058234], Silvia Corchs2,3[0000000217398110],
Mirko Caglioni1, and Francesca Gasparini1,2[0000000262796660]
1University of Milano-Bicocca, Viale Sarca 336, 20126, Milano, Italy
aurora.saibene@unimib.it, m.caglioni2@campus.unimib.it,
francesca.gasparini@unimib.it
2NeuroMI, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126,
Milano, Italy
3University of Insubria, Via J. H. Dunant 3, 21100, Varese, Italy
silvia.corchs@uninsubria.it
Abstract. The Motor Imagery (MI) electroencephalography (EEG) based
Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) allow the direct communication be-
tween humans and machines by exploiting the neural pathways connected
to motor imagination. Therefore, these systems open the possibility of
developing applications that could span from the medical field to the
entertainment industry. In this context, Artificial Intelligence (AI) ap-
proaches become of fundamental importance especially when wanting to
provide a correct and coherent feedback to BCI users. Moreover, publicly
available datasets in the field of MI EEG-based BCIs have been widely
exploited to test new techniques from the AI domain. In this work, AI
approaches applied to datasets collected in different years and with dif-
ferent devices but with coherent experimental paradigms are investigated
with the aim of providing a concise yet sufficiently comprehensive survey
on the evolution and influence of AI techniques on MI EEG-based BCI
data.
Keywords: artificial intelligence ·brain computer interface ·electroen-
cephalography ·motor imagery
1 Introduction
Translating thoughts into commands understandable by external applications
and devices is the basic principle ruling the development of Brain Computer
Interfaces (BCIs) [32]. The most appreciated method to collect neural signals is
the electroencephalogram (EEG), having that it records data with non-invasive
surface sensors called electrodes, it is sufficiently low-cost and with possible high
temporal and spatial resolution [7]. Moreover, the EEG signals are characterized
by rhythms, whose fluctuations may be exploited to detect specific brain states
[35]. Among these brain conditions, the imagination of voluntary movements,
called Motor Imagery (MI), may be observed over the primary sensorimotor cor-
tex with amplitude variations of the µand βrhythms [39] [8]. These effects can
arXiv:2210.06290v1 [eess.SP] 11 Oct 2022
2 A. Saibene et al.
be exploited to create MI EEG-based BCIs that can be used for a variety of ap-
plications spanning from rehabilitation procedures to the control of wheelchair
movements [32], and in conjunction with virtual and augmented reality [15].
Therefore, one of the main BCI life-cycle components is represented by feedback,
which benefits from the evolution and improvement of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
approaches [6] in predicting the different brain states to be translated into sys-
tem commands.
Consequently, how have the AI techniques evolved in and influenced the field
of MI EEG-based BCIs, considering the great number of possibilities offered by
these systems?
This work aims at providing a brief overview and discussion on this topic by
analysing the AI approaches that have been applied to some representative
datasets present in the domain literature.
Therefore, in Section 2 the paper firstly provides an overall view of the time-
line related to MI EEG-based BCIs and justifies the choice of specific datasets,
that are described in Section 3. An overview of the AI techniques applied to these
data is provided in Section 4 and observations on the presented AI approaches
are discussed in Section 5. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 6.
2 Overview
The research on MI EEG-based BCIs has become particularly prolific in the last
years. In fact, typing a quick query on Scopus4title, abstract and keywords of
indexed works, i.e., TITLE-ABS-KEY((mi OR motor AND imagery OR motor
AND imagination) AND (eeg OR electroencephalographic) AND based AND (bci
OR brain AND computer AND interface)), we obtain the graphic in Figure 1.
Notice that the search was conducted during September 2022.
Besides having a clear understanding of a constant increase of publications on
these topics starting from 2017 and having for now its apex in 2021, Figure 1
provides a story of the early phases of the MI EEG-based BCIs, which set the
foundation for later works.
An initial period (1996-2003) during which the BCI community began to discuss
these topics was followed by a discrete boost (2004) of the research production
probably due to the insightful work of Schalk et al. [31] and the outcome of the
BCI Competition 2003 [5].
Starting from the evident direction took by many laboratories concerning the de-
velopment of systems capable of enabling a mean of communication and control
for patients with severe motor disabilities, Schalk et al. presented the BCI20005,
which is an open-source platform that allows the management of BCI systems
and that remains active and maintained to the present day. Moreover, not only
some of the authors of [31] were involved in the BCI Competition 2003, but also
the names of the researchers of the pioneer work of 1996 [13] obtained with the
4https://www.scopus.com/
5https://www.bci2000.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
The evolution of AI approaches for motor imagery EEG-based BCIs 3
Scopus search, unsurprisingly appear. In fact, they contributed to dataset III ti-
tled Motor Imagery, which presented data acquired on the main central cortical
electrodes (C{3,4,z}) during the imagination of left or right hand movements,
with the main aim of providing a continuous feedback to the BCI users. The win-
ning strategy to the proposed problem was presented by Lemm et al. [18], who
tried to disclose motor intention by characterizing the EEG signal rhythmic ac-
tivity through complex Morlet wavelet [34] application and using a probabilistic
model to predict left or right hand MI.
Fig. 1. Number of papers per year obtained by querying Scopus on MI EEG-based
BCI related keywords (search conducted during September 2022).
Afterwards, the BCI Competitions - Berlin Brain Computer-Interface6datasets
quickly became benchmarks on which test strategies to provide more efficient and
reliable BCI systems.
By adding to the first query the string (bci AND competition AND (2003 OR ii
OR iii OR iv)), representing the BCI Competition II (or 2003), III and IV, and
limiting the results to year 2021 only, 27 papers are provided in output, of which
23 use the BCI Competition IV datasets (especially, 2a and 2b). Considering
that Figure 1 reports 97 works published in 2021 and that the screening through
Scopus is done only on the title, abstract, and keywords of the works indexed
by this search engine, the number of publications using the BCI Competition IV
dataset 2a and 2b [33] seems to be fairly high and justifies a deeper analysis con-
cerning the AI techniques tested on them to better understand their evolution
during a long time span.
However, these datasets present EEG recordings acquired on a restricted
number of subjects, considering a restricted number of electrodes and experimen-
tal conditions (as detailed in Section 3). Wanting to have a general overview of
the evolution of AI approaches in MI EEG-based BCIs and noticing its increased
6https://www.bbci.de/competition/
4 A. Saibene et al.
use as a benchmark in the last 10 years, the EEG Motor Movement/Imagery
Dataset [31] [11] collected from a larger population, using a different montage,
and considering diverse MI tasks, but using the BCI2000 system, is also consid-
ered.
Moreover, a great attention has been given to wearable technologies, espe-
cially in the last few years, since the necessity of moving the use of BCIs from
medical and laboratory environments to real-world scenarios is becoming more
pressing due to a variety of needs like developing in-home rehabilitation tools
[9], exploiting customer-grade devices [37], and providing continuous assistive
technologies [23] that patients could easily use alone without having to buy ex-
pensive equipment.
Following these principles, Peterson et al. [29] have collected the MI-OpenBCI
dataset using wearable low-cost technologies to record MI EEG-based BCI data.
Therefore, an overview of this dataset is provided to have a closer look on future
developments of these new systems and the changing role of AI when facing
them.
3 Datasets
Considering the brief overview presented in Section 2, the datasets that will be at
the center of this paper analysis are the BCI Competition IV dataset 2a (2012)
and 2b (2012) [33], the EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset (2009) [31] [11],
and the MI-OpenBCI (2020) one [29]. In this section a concise description of their
characteristics is reported for completeness.
3.1 BCI Competition IV dataset 2a
The BCI Competition IV dataset 2a [33] is provided under the name Contin-
uous Multi-class Motor Imagery. In fact, it has been collected from 9 subjects
executing a cue-based BCI paradigm consisting of left/right hand, both feet and
tongue MI. Each subject participated in different days to 2 experimental sessions
containing 6 experimental runs of 48 trials each.
Figure 2 depicts the montage consisting of 22 Ag/AgCl electrodes for scalp
recording, reference and ground electrodes placed on the left and right mastoids,
and 3 monopolar electrooculogram channels (positioned to provide reference for
artifact removal).
The signals have been acquired with 250Hz sampling rate and the dataset au-
thors provided them bandpass (0.5-100Hz) and notch (50Hz) filtered. The noisy
trials were removed by manual screening of experts.
3.2 BCI Competition IV dataset 2b
The BCI Competition IV dataset 2b [33] presents the following short description:
Session-to-Session Transfer of a Motor Imagery BCI under Presence of Eye
Artifacts. In fact, the motivation driving its presence into the BCI competition
摘要:

TheevolutionofAIapproachesformotorimageryEEG-basedBCIsAuroraSaibene1;2[0000000244058234],SilviaCorchs2;3[0000000217398110],MirkoCaglioni1,andFrancescaGasparini1;2[0000000262796660]1UniversityofMilano-Bicocca,VialeSarca336,20126,Milano,Italyaurora.saibene@unimib.it,m.caglioni2@campus.unimib.it,france...

展开>> 收起<<
The evolution of AI approaches for motor imagery EEG-based BCIs Aurora Saibene120000000244058234 Silvia Corchs230000000217398110.pdf

共16页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:16 页 大小:377.03KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-26

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 16
客服
关注