Connectivity-Aware Pheromone Mobility Model for Autonomous UA V Networks Shreyas Devaraju Alexander Ihlery and Sunil Kumarz

2025-04-24 0 0 601.16KB 7 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Connectivity-Aware Pheromone Mobility Model for
Autonomous UAV Networks
Shreyas Devaraju, Alexander Ihler, and Sunil Kumar
Computational Science Research Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
School of Information & Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Email: sdevaraju@sdsu.edu, ihler@ics.uci.edu, skumar@sdsu.edu
Abstract—UAV networks consisting of reduced size, weight,
and power (low SWaP) fixed-wing UAVs are used for civilian
and military applications such as search and rescue, surveillance,
and tracking. To carry out these operations efficiently, there is a
need to develop scalable, decentralized autonomous UAV network
architectures with high network connectivity. However, the area
coverage and the network connectivity requirements exhibit
a fundamental trade-off. In this paper, a connectivity-aware
pheromone mobility (CAP) model is designed for search and
rescue operations, which is capable of maintaining connectivity
among UAVs in the network. We use stigmergy-based digital
pheromone maps along with distance-based local connectivity
information to autonomously coordinate the UAV movements, in
order to improve its map coverage efficiency while maintaining
high network connectivity.
Index Terms—Airborne network, UAV network, search and
rescue, network connectivity, pheromone model.
I. INTRODUCTION
The unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), equipped with self-
localization and sensing capabilities, are used in applications
such as search-and-rescue, tracking and surveillance [1]–[4].
Distributed UAV networks are scalable, sense simultaneously
in an expanded area, and do not have a single point of failure.
In distributed or decentralized, autonomous UAV network
architectures, the nodes perform only local sensing and com-
municate with their neighbors without any global knowledge
[1]. However, such networks can face communication issues,
since low SWaP (size, weight and power) UAVs have a limited
communication range. Therefore, the connectivity among the
UAVs must be maintained to allow their coordination and
control. Whereas a high network connectivity facilitates better
communication among the UAVs, an increase in coverage
performance leads to a faster discovery and better tracking
of targets in a search area. Note that the area coverage
and network connectivity requirements exhibit a trade-off,
i.e., dispersing the UAVs to improve coverage will typically
negatively impact connectivity [2], [3].
Swarm intelligence methodologies inspired by nature, such
as the social behavior of insects, birds, and fish, can be used to
solve complex problems cooperatively by using simple rules
and local interactions. One such widely used method is the
use of stigmergic digital pheromones [4], [5], which act as
the spatio-temporal potential fields that are used to coordi-
nate and control the UAV movement. In this paper, we use
the digital pheromone-based stigmergic algorithms to achieve
quick exploration of completely unknown environments. Their
decentralized nature makes them fault-tolerant and highly
scalable. However, most repulsion pheromone-based mobility
models focus only on coverage performance of UAV networks,
and ignore the connectivity.
This paper addresses the problem of achieving an effi-
cient coverage of a given search area while preserving the
network connectivity in an autonomous, decentralized UAV
network. We design a UAV mobility model, which combine the
pheromone mobility model with local connectivity information
to optimize the coverage and connectivity performance. We
call the model as connectivity-aware pheromone mobility
(CAP) model. This mobility model selects a UAV path that
balances pheromone values with estimated connectivity values
at a number of potential waypoints.
Paper Organization: We first review the existing schemes
for UAV mobility in Section II, followed by a brief overview
of the pheromone based UAV mobility model in Section III.
Then we describe our proposed CAP model in Section IV.
The simulation results are discussed in Section V, followed
by the conclusions in Section VI.
II. RELATED WORK
Several algorithms such as particle swarm optimization,
artificial bee colony and ant colony optimization (ACO) have
been proposed for control and coordination of swarms for
various search, rescue, and tracking applications [1], [6]. The
digital pheromone based mobility model has been used for
target search and other other similar tasks in UAV networks.
In digital pheromone schemes, information about the
pheromone map is communicated between agents in the net-
work through direct or indirect communication. In the direct
communication methods, each agent maintains a full or partial
pheromone map of its immediate vicinity. Updates in the
pheromone map due to deposits or withdrawals are communi-
cated only locally. In [7], distributed stigmergic coordination
of UAVs for automatic target recognition is done through
direct communication. The UAVs mark potential targets and
communicate the pheromone information to their neighbors
using a decentralized gossip mechanism.
Sauter et al. [5] is an example of indirect communication
scheme for controlling and coordinating the UAV swarm for
arXiv:2210.06684v1 [cs.NI] 13 Oct 2022
surveillance, target acquisition, and tracking. Here the coor-
dination of swarm members is based on digital pheromones
maintained in an artificial pheromone map, and a central-
ized base station (BS) is used to communicate the global
pheromone map to all the UAVs. Failure of the centralized
BS may lead to failure of the entire system.
Some schemes use a fusion of stigmergic pheromone algo-
rithm and flocking behaviors to coordinate a group of UAVs
for performing decentralized target search [4], [8]. Here, the
UAVs deposit digital attract pheromones when a potential tar-
get is detected to attract UAVs in the area; Repel pheromones
are deposited when no target is found. They also follow Boids
[9] flocking rules to organize the swarm for better perception
and communication for tracking the targets. An evolutionary
algorithm is used in [4] for tuning the pheromone and flocking
behaviors to get an optimal performance. Shao et al. [10]
designed a navigation algorithm by using the pheromone
algorithm on top of the Olfati-Saber’s flocking algorithm [11],
where leader-follower based flocking is performed. The cov-
erage and network connectivity performance for a UAV group
using a random vs. pheromone guided mobility model are
compared in [2]. While the random model follows a Markov
process, the UAVs move to a low repel pheromone area in the
pheromone model. The pheromone model provides a better
coverage than the random model, but neither model show a
good connectivity performance. Messous et al. [14] address
the connectivity issue in UAV fleets by weighting a UAV’s
tendency to follow its neighbor based on its connectivity, hop
count to the base station, and energy level. Similarly, dual-
pheromone clustering hybird approach (DPCHA) [13] uses
dual pheromones for target tracking and area coverage, and
the clustering to maintain stable network connectivity.
A. Review of CACOC2Model
The CACOC2model [12] uses the ACO with a chaotic
dynamical system (CACOC) [15], together with the Boids
flocking model to maximize the coverage while preserving
the network connectivity. The CACOC model [15] uses the
pheromone mobility model, along with chaotic dynamics
obtained using the Rossler system, to obtain a deterministic
but unpredictable system. In CACOC, each UAV in the swarm
moves left (L), ahead (A) or right (R) based on the pheromone
values in its respective neighboring cells and the next value
(ρn) in the first return map of the Rossler attractor (see Fig. 1
in [12]).
In CACOC2model, the Boids flocking behavior [9], in-
cluding the collision avoidance, velocity matching and flock
centering, is combined with CACOC to improve the network
connectivity. Here, the flock centering forces the UAVs to
maintain connectivity. The model uses two forces [12] :
ˆ
FCis a vector that gives a direction (L, R or A).
ˆ
Fflock is a vector for the flock centering force computed
with the average value of the last vector used for the
neighboring UAVs.
The normalized sum of the these two force vectors gives a
vector ˆ
Vwith a constant speed v[12] :
ˆ
V=v·ˆ
FC+f·ˆ
Fflock
kˆ
FC+f·ˆ
Fflock k2(1)
In (1), frepresents the influence of flocking force, which
determines the connectivity among the UAVs.
III. OVERVIEW OF PHEROMONE MOBILITY MODEL
The pheromone mobility model uses repel digital
pheromones to promote exploration and fast coverage of
an area with no prior information [16]. Note that a dig-
ital pheromone has the same characteristics of a natural
pheromone, such as deposition, evaporation and diffusion.
Each UAV moves towards the cells with minimum repel
pheromone value and deposits a repel pheromone of magnitude
‘1’ in the cells scanned along its trajectory. After a UAV
deposits a pheromone in a cell (x, y), it is progressively
diffused to the surrounding cells, with a constant diffusion
rate ψ[0,1]. This encourages UAVs to spread out and
move toward the unvisited cells. The pheromone value of each
cell also evaporates, decreasing its intensity over time by a
constant rate λ[0,1]. If the map environment and target
locations change with time, the evaporation of the deposited
repel pheromones over time allows for UAVs to revisit already
scanned cells of the map after a certain time gap.
For simplicity, the UAVs are assumed to move in two-
dimensional space to search a given area, which is divided
in a grid of C2cells, where each cell is identified by its (x, y)
coordinates. Pheromones deposited by each UAV in the grid
space are saved in a digital pheromone map. In a decentralized
UAV network, the UAVs exchange their digital pheromone
maps with their 1-hop neighbors by using the periodic ’hello
messages’.
Mathematically the pheromone value p(x,y)in a cell (x, y)
at time tis described as [4], [5], [8],
p(x,y)(t) = (1 λ)·[(1 ψ)·p(x,y)(t1)+
p(x,y)(t1, t) + d(x,y)(t1, t)] (2)
where (1 ψ)·p(x,y)(t1) is the pheromone value re-
maining in cell (x, y)after diffusion to the surrounding cells,
p(x,y)(t1, t)is the new pheromone value deposited in
the update interval (t1, t), and d(x,y)(t1, t)is the
additional pheromone diffused to the current cell from its eight
surrounding cells in the update interval (t1, t), which is
described as,
d(x,y)(t1, t) = ψ
8·
1
X
a=1
1
X
b=1
p(x+a,y+b)(t1) (3)
IV. CONNECTIVITY-AWARE PHEROMONE MODEL
The pheromone mobility models achieve a fast coverage of
the area by pushing the UAVs away from each other. However,
this leads to poor connectivity among UAV nodes due to a
limited transmission range of UAVs. Maintaining a strong
摘要:

Connectivity-AwarePheromoneMobilityModelforAutonomousUAVNetworksShreyasDevaraju,AlexanderIhlery,andSunilKumarzComputationalScienceResearchCenter,SanDiegoStateUniversity,SanDiego,CA,USAySchoolofInformation&ComputerScience,UniversityofCalifornia,Irvine,CA,USAzElectrical&ComputerEngineeringDepartmen...

展开>> 收起<<
Connectivity-Aware Pheromone Mobility Model for Autonomous UA V Networks Shreyas Devaraju Alexander Ihlery and Sunil Kumarz.pdf

共7页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:7 页 大小:601.16KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-24

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 7
客服
关注