supergravity theories, which typically do not allow a positive cosmological constant. The seminal
review [23] summarises the status of the problem before the early 90s.
Perhaps the most straightforward procedure for solving the mismatch is to postulate a bare,
purely classical contribution inherent to GR to the cosmological constant, Λb, that would cancel
part of ρvac/M2
Pl. However, the modern view of QFT within the effective field theory approach
is that such a proposal is radiatively unstable or extremely fine-tuned, as discussed later. There
are many reviews on other approaches (see, for instance, [24,25]), and the present work aims at
reviewing modified gravity theories to alleviate or solve the cosmological constant problem. As
we will discuss in this review, the problem actually has different facets, and it is a priori unclear
whether all of them can be addressed at once or not.
Since the problem occurs when trying to calculate the gravitational effect of QFT vacuum
energies, one approach to tackle the issue is to modify gravity itself. As shown in Sec. 2and 3
there is little space to solve the CCP within classical GR. Setting aside anthropic arguments and
discussions about fine-tuning [26–33], modifying GR not only offers a new view on the CCP but
also provides new phenomenological signatures. Generally speaking, modified gravity theories
introduce extra fields and/or constraints on GR such that the coupling of matter to the metric
is modified and/or there are extra universal couplings with the extra fields in a way that is
consistent with observations. It is natural then to ask if and how the CCP manifests itself in
such theories, and this is one of the motivations for developing them.
Another motivation for studying modified gravity approaches is the fact that some of these
theories are typical examples of how to evade Weinberg’s no-go theorem, as discussed in Sec. 3.1.2,
and its complement, reviewed in Sec. 3.1.3. We highlight possible loopholes in the assumptions of
the no-go theorems in Sec. 3.1.4 and use them as a systematic guiding principle for the modified
gravity theories considered throughout the review. The idea of this review is not to cover all
modified gravity literature. Instead, we make a narrow choice of models that we deem promising
and exemplify the discussed loopholes with an emphasis on how the CCP is addressed in each
one of them. For other reviews on modified gravity and the cosmological constant issues, see
[23,24,34–41].
We start by carefully introducing the different contributions and aspects of the cosmological
constant problem in Sec. 2. Any possible solution to the cosmological constant problem is severely
constrained by powerful no-go theorems, which we recap in Sec. 3together with potential ways
to circumvent the theorems while taking into consideration various observational constraints. In
Sec. 4.1, we summarise the task at hand from both a theoretical and phenomenological point of
view before diving into various approaches in Sec. 4. We discuss the extent to which the various
modified gravity theories can solve parts of the problem in Sec. 5.
Conventions: Unless otherwise stated, we set c=~= 1 and use the metric signature (−+++).
The gravitational coupling is denoted by M2
Pl in all sections, apart from Sec. 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 on
sequestering, where κ2and κ2(x)are used to indicate the promotion of the Planck mass to a
variable. We use Lmor Smfor a generic matter component, and only specify its content as L(...)
2