Modified gravity approaches to the cosmological constant problem Foundational Aspects of Dark Energy FADE Collaboration

2025-04-24 0 0 1.61MB 54 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Modified gravity approaches to the cosmological
constant problem
Foundational Aspects of Dark Energy (FADE) Collaboration
Heliudson Bernardo,1Benjamin Bose,2,3,4Guilherme Franzmann,4,5Steffen
Hagstotz,6,7§Yutong He,5,8Aliki Litsa,8and Florian Niedermann5∗∗
1Department of Physics, Ernest Rutherford Physics Building, McGill University,
3600 Rue Université, Montréal, Québec H3A 2T8, Canada
2Département de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève,
24 quai Ernest Ansermet, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland
3Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edin-
burgh, EH9 3HJ, U.K
4Basic Research Community for Physics e.V., Mariannenstraße 89, Leipzig, Germany
5Nordita,
KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University,
Hannes Alfvéns väg 12, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
6Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München,
Scheinerstraße 1, D-81679 München, Germany
7Excellence Cluster ORIGINS, Boltzmannstraße 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
8The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University
Roslagstullsbacken 21A, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Invited review for Special Issue “Cosmological Constant” in Universe.
heliudson.deoliveirabernardo@mcgill.ca
ben.bose@ed.ac.uk
guilherme.franzmann@su.se
§steffen.hagstotz@lmu.de
yutong.he@su.se
aliki.litsa@fysik.su.se
∗∗florian.niedermann@su.se
arXiv:2210.06810v1 [gr-qc] 13 Oct 2022
Abstract
The cosmological constant and its phenomenology remain among the greatest puzzles in
theoretical physics. We review how modifications of Einstein’s general relativity could alleviate
the different problems associated with it that result from the interplay of classical gravity and
quantum field theory. We introduce a modern and concise language to describe the problems
associated with its phenomenology, and inspect no-go theorems and their loopholes to motivate
the approaches discussed here. Constrained gravity approaches exploit minimal departures from
general relativity; massive gravity introduces mass to the graviton; Horndeski theories lead to
the breaking of translational invariance of the vacuum; and models with extra dimensions change
the symmetries of the vacuum. We also review screening mechanisms that have to be present
in some of these theories if they aim to recover the success of general relativity on small scales
as well. Finally, we summarise the statuses of these models in their attempt to solve the dif-
ferent cosmological constant problems while being able to account for current astrophysical and
cosmological observations.
Acronyms
CCP Cosmological Constant Problem
UV Ultraviolet
EFT Effective Field Theory
GR General Relativity
EMT Energy-Momentum Tensor
CDM Cold Dark Matter
CC Cosmological Constant
DE Dark Energy
SM Standard Model of Particle Physics
QFT Quantum Field Theory
QCD Quantum Chromodynamics
DEP Dark Energy Problem
IR Infrared
DGP Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati gravity
CMB Cosmic Microwave Background
CHC Cosmic History Constraint
AC Astrophysical Constraints
SLED Supersymmetric Large Extra
Dimension
Disclaimer: This review does not intend, in any way, to present an exhaustive collection of
modified gravity approaches. Instead, the models were chosen to exemplify the different ways
one can bypass no-go theorems surrounding the cosmological constant problem, and they are
subjected to the authors’ personal biases and preferences on the subject.
i
Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 What is the problem after all? 3
3 How to modify gravity 5
3.1 Self-tuning 5
3.1.1 A failed start 6
3.1.2 Weinberg’s argument 8
3.1.3 Beyond Weinberg’s argument 10
3.1.4 Loopholes 11
3.2 Screening Mechanisms 13
3.2.1 Potential screening 15
3.2.2 Derivative screening 16
4 Modified Gravity Approaches 18
4.1 What do we want? 19
4.2 Constraining Gravity 19
4.2.1 The Global Vacuum Energy Sequestering 20
4.2.2 Local Sequestering 22
4.2.3 Non-local Approach 23
4.2.4 Unimodular Gravity 25
4.3 Massive gravity 26
4.3.1 Degravitation 26
4.3.2 Linear Massive Gravity 27
4.3.3 Nonlinear Theories 28
4.4 Self-tuning with Horndeski theories 29
4.4.1 The Fab-4 30
4.4.2 Well-tempered self-tuning 31
4.4.3 Outlook 32
4.5 Braneworld models 33
4.5.1 Our Universe as a cosmic string in six dimensions 34
4.5.2 Supersymmetric large extra dimensions 36
4.5.3 Outlook 38
5 Conclusions - You can’t always get what you want, or can you? 38
References 42
ii
1 Introduction
The cosmological constant problem (CCP) is one of the most persistent puzzles in theoretical
physics. It appears at the interface between quantum mechanics and gravity, and it seemingly
contradicts one of the major building blocks of modern physics, which is that scales in nature
decouple. We hope that it is possible to understand physics at low energies without a detailed
knowledge of the ultraviolet (UV)-complete theory. Formally, this decoupling of scales is ex-
pressed through the enormously successful framework of effective field theories (EFT), which is
challenged by the CCP.
Viewed solely as a metric theory for spacetime, Einstein’s general relativity (GR) allows for
a cosmological constant Λthat is left unfixed by the principles and symmetries of the theory.
Such a parameter may compete with the energy-momentum tensor (EMT) of local sources in
the equations of motion to produce certain solutions, as was the case of Einstein’s cosmological
static solution [1,2]. In fact, the weak strength of the gravitational interaction is such that all
local tests of GR are compatible with Λ=0, singling out cosmological observations to constrain
Λ.
The current cosmological concordance model, ΛCDM, is fully based on classical GR and
employs a cosmological constant (CC) to describe the present period of accelerated expansion
necessary to fit both early- [3] and late-time (e.g. [410], and see [11] for a recent review)
observational data. Although there are other cosmological models in which the driver of the
current epoch of accelerated expansion, herein referred to as dark energy (DE), is not described
by a cosmological constant, standard GR with a CC is still the preferred model once many data
sets are analysed together [11].
However, problems appear once we consider the standard model of particle physics (SM)
together with GR. The SM is based on quantum field theory (QFT) in Minkowski spacetime.
Within the QFT paradigm the local energy-momentum tensor of field systems might be non-
zero even in the vacuum state, in which case they have the same structure as the EMT of a
CC term [12]. Hence, the existence of the SM fields, inferred from local experiments, implies
that there are quantum-matter induced contributions to the cosmological constant. This means
that if DE is a CC, then the Λ-fitted value (a.k.a. effective cosmological constant) also includes
contributions from the SM quantum fields, generically referred to as the vacuum energy density,
ρvac.
Typically, any vacuum energy contribution is enormous and would completely dominate the
gravitational dynamics of the Universe. This was first noted by Nernst in 1916 [13], and famously
Pauli quipped that “the Universe would not even reach to the moon” [14]2given the large vacuum
energy from quantum fields. The problem was formally analysed in a cosmological context by
Zel’dovich in the 70s [19,20]. By the late 80s, due to the perturbative UV incompleteness of
GR [21,22], it was expected that a quantum version of the theory would fix Λ. Prior to the
discovery of the accelerated cosmological expansion, popular attempts of doing so were based on
2Lenz [15] was the first to make such a comparison (see e.g. [1618] and references therein for historical notes).
1
supergravity theories, which typically do not allow a positive cosmological constant. The seminal
review [23] summarises the status of the problem before the early 90s.
Perhaps the most straightforward procedure for solving the mismatch is to postulate a bare,
purely classical contribution inherent to GR to the cosmological constant, Λb, that would cancel
part of ρvac/M2
Pl. However, the modern view of QFT within the effective field theory approach
is that such a proposal is radiatively unstable or extremely fine-tuned, as discussed later. There
are many reviews on other approaches (see, for instance, [24,25]), and the present work aims at
reviewing modified gravity theories to alleviate or solve the cosmological constant problem. As
we will discuss in this review, the problem actually has different facets, and it is a priori unclear
whether all of them can be addressed at once or not.
Since the problem occurs when trying to calculate the gravitational effect of QFT vacuum
energies, one approach to tackle the issue is to modify gravity itself. As shown in Sec. 2and 3
there is little space to solve the CCP within classical GR. Setting aside anthropic arguments and
discussions about fine-tuning [2633], modifying GR not only offers a new view on the CCP but
also provides new phenomenological signatures. Generally speaking, modified gravity theories
introduce extra fields and/or constraints on GR such that the coupling of matter to the metric
is modified and/or there are extra universal couplings with the extra fields in a way that is
consistent with observations. It is natural then to ask if and how the CCP manifests itself in
such theories, and this is one of the motivations for developing them.
Another motivation for studying modified gravity approaches is the fact that some of these
theories are typical examples of how to evade Weinberg’s no-go theorem, as discussed in Sec. 3.1.2,
and its complement, reviewed in Sec. 3.1.3. We highlight possible loopholes in the assumptions of
the no-go theorems in Sec. 3.1.4 and use them as a systematic guiding principle for the modified
gravity theories considered throughout the review. The idea of this review is not to cover all
modified gravity literature. Instead, we make a narrow choice of models that we deem promising
and exemplify the discussed loopholes with an emphasis on how the CCP is addressed in each
one of them. For other reviews on modified gravity and the cosmological constant issues, see
[23,24,3441].
We start by carefully introducing the different contributions and aspects of the cosmological
constant problem in Sec. 2. Any possible solution to the cosmological constant problem is severely
constrained by powerful no-go theorems, which we recap in Sec. 3together with potential ways
to circumvent the theorems while taking into consideration various observational constraints. In
Sec. 4.1, we summarise the task at hand from both a theoretical and phenomenological point of
view before diving into various approaches in Sec. 4. We discuss the extent to which the various
modified gravity theories can solve parts of the problem in Sec. 5.
Conventions: Unless otherwise stated, we set c=~= 1 and use the metric signature (+++).
The gravitational coupling is denoted by M2
Pl in all sections, apart from Sec. 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 on
sequestering, where κ2and κ2(x)are used to indicate the promotion of the Planck mass to a
variable. We use Lmor Smfor a generic matter component, and only specify its content as L(...)
2
摘要:

ModiedgravityapproachestothecosmologicalconstantproblemFoundationalAspectsofDarkEnergy(FADE)CollaborationHeliudsonBernardo,1*BenjaminBose,2;3;4„GuilhermeFranzmann,4;5…SteenHagstotz,6;7ŸYutongHe,5;8¶AlikiLitsa,8†andFlorianNiedermann5**1DepartmentofPhysics,ErnestRutherfordPhysicsBuilding,McGillUnive...

展开>> 收起<<
Modified gravity approaches to the cosmological constant problem Foundational Aspects of Dark Energy FADE Collaboration.pdf

共54页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:54 页 大小:1.61MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-24

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 54
客服
关注