
Nature | Vol 610 | 13 October 2022 | 269
Article
Radiation-driven acceleration in the
expanding WR140 dust shell
Yinuo Han1,2 ✉, Peter G. Tuthill2, Ryan M. Lau3,4 & Anthony Soulain2,5
The Wolf–Rayet (WR) binary system WR140 is a close (0.9–16.7mas; ref. 1) binary star
consisting of an O5 primary and WC7 companion2 and is known as the archetype of
episodic dust-producing WRs. Dust in WR binaries is known to form in a conned
stream originating from the collision of the two stellar winds, with orbital motion of
the binary sculpting the large-scale dust structure into arcs as dust is swept radially
outwards. It is understood that sensitive conditions required for dust production in
WR140 are only met around periastron when the two stars are suciently close2–4.
Here we present multiepoch imagery of the circumstellar dust shell of WR140. We
constructed geometric models that closely trace the expansion of the intricately
structured dust plume, showing that complex eects induced by orbital modulation
may result in a ‘Goldilocks zone’ for dust production. We nd that the expansion of the
dust plume cannot be reproduced under the assumption of a simple uniform-speed
outow, nding instead the dust to be accelerating. This constitutes a direct
kinematic record of dust motion under acceleration by radiation pressure and further
highlights the complexity of the physical conditions in colliding-wind binaries.
The WR140 was observed on six occasions between 2001 and 2017 with
the near-infrared cameras NIRC and NIRC2 at the Keck Observatory.
The near-infrared imagery, displayed in Fig.1, spans orbital phases
between ϕ=0.043 and 0.592, clearly showing an expanding dust shell
with an evolving apparent morphology. Although the images span
two orbital cycles, features appear to be consistent, implying a high
degree of cycle-to-cycle replication of the same underlying morphol-
ogy. Prominent structures at earlier orbital phases (≤0.111) include an
eastern and western dust arc. As the dust shell expands, these structures
give rise to an ‘eastern arm’ and a prominent ‘southern bar’ at later
orbital phases, following the nomenclature of structures identified
in previous imaging4.
The well-resolved detailed form of the plume motivates the con-
struction of a geometric model to explain the structural variation and
expansion over time. We modelled the geometry of the dust plume
as a linearly expanding spiral based on the ‘pinwheel mechanism’
5,6
.
We assumed that dust production turns on and off episodically as
the binary approaches, and departs the region near periastron. The
wind-collision region can be approximated as the surface of a cone at
large distances from the stars where the velocity of the compressed
wind has reached its asymptotic value7. Dust assumed to form on this
conical interface between the WR star and the O-star primary subse-
quently expands radially outwards as the binary continues in its orbit.
Originally modelled on WR104 (ref.
5
), such pinwheel models have been
shown to accurately reproduce dust structures in several Wolf–Rayet
(WR) binaries including Apep8 and WR112 (ref. 9).
The orbital parameters of WR140 are well constrained
1,10
and form
the basis for generation of the geometric dust plume model. By fitting
to the location and geometry of dust structures across the multiple
epochs of observations, our model suggests that the half-opening
angle of the conical shock front is θ
w
=40±5°. This value is in close
agreement with that estimated by Fahed etal.11 (42±3°), which is
derived by fitting a cone model12 to the 5696A C emission line, and
Williams etal.13 (34±1°) by modelling the 10830 He subpeak. The θw
value estimated in this study implies a momentum ratio between the
O and WR star of
=0.043
assuming radiative postshock condi-
tions7,14, which is a larger value than that expected from the mass-loss
rate and wind speed of the stars (Extended Data Table2). Upon fitting
to the turn-on and turn-off values independently, we find that dust
production occurs over a period of
.7
yr centred at the periastron
passage, with key parameters of the dust production thresholds dis-
played in Extended Data Table3.
An image simulated under this geometric model at ϕ=0.592 is dis-
played in Fig.2a. When comparing with the corresponding observations
(Fig.1), this model successfully reproduces a number of prominent
features, with very accurate registration between the structural edges
in the model and the data. The eastern arm represents a segment of
the ellipse that corresponds to the earliest dust produced in the dust
production episode (when dust production turned on), whereas the
southern bar corresponds to the most recently produced dust in the
episode (just before dust production turned off).
However, not all predicted features are apparent in the data. Although
the geometric model is primarily designed to reproduce structural fea-
tures, its physical interpretation implies a pinwheel system producing
isothermal, optically thin dust at a constant rate. The clear absence of
structures predicted by the geometric model, most noticeably dust
features to the north and west (an outer-western arc) and below the
southern bar, cannot be explained by simple density variations due
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05155-5
Received: 15 December 2021
Accepted: 27 July 2022
Published online: 12 October 2022
Open access
Check for updates
1Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 2Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3NSF’s NOIR
Lab, Tucson, AZ, USA. 4Institute of Space & Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Japan. 5Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, Grenoble, France.
✉e-mail: yinuo.han@ast.cam.ac.uk