Active EMI Cancellation for MRI Zhao & Wu et al. Arxiv 2022
Page 3 of 16
INTRODUCTION
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is intrinsically superior to other medical imaging modalities (e.g.,
computed tomography and positron emission tomography), because it is non-invasive, non-ionizing,
inherently quantitative and multi-parametric1,2. However, conventional MRI scanners require
specialized and expensive installations due to infrastructural requirements, e.g., site preparation to
host the large magnets that typically weigh 3000-4500 kg, magnetic and radiofrequency (RF)
shielding, electricity to drive power-consuming electronics, and water requirement for gradient
cooling3. Consequently, the vast majority of clinical MRI scanners are housed inside fully enclosed
RF shielding room on ground floors of large hospitals and clinics, severely hindering the accessibility
and patient-friendliness of MRI in modern healthcare4.
Recently, there has been a growing impetus to develop MRI scanners at ultra-low-field (ULF)
strengths (i.e., below 0.1 Tesla or T)4-13 for low-cost clinical imaging. Preliminary results
demonstrated that these ULF MRI developments produced clinically valuable information for brain
pathology diagnosis10-15. These ULF scanners also eliminate the need for a magnetic shielding cage
because of dramatic fringe field reduction, yet many of them still require bulky and enclosed RF
shielding to prevent external electromagnetic interference (EMI) signals during data acquisition.
Such requirement precludes the portability of ULF MRI scanners for truly point-of-care applications
(e.g., in intensive care units and surgical suites).
Several solutions have been recently developed to tackle the RF shielding cage requirement for ULF
MRI9,16-20. One group used simple conductive cloth to cover the subject during scanning9. This
passive method could alter and mitigate EMI from external environments, but its performance was
suboptimal. Moreover, it was inadequate to deal with EMI from internal sources, such as scanner
console, gradient/RF amplifiers, and power supplies. Alternatively, active methods were also
proposed to reduce or eliminate external EMI. One group utilized magnetometers to sense
environmental EMI and remove EMI signals in MRI receive coil via an adaptive suppression
procedure16. This method was hardware demanding and only yielded limited success. An analytical
approach was proposed to estimate EMI signals in MRI receive coil from EMI signals detected by
EMI sensing coils using the frequency domain transfer functions among coils17. More recently, it
was extended for time domain implementation as linear convolutions and with an adaptive
procedure18. This method eliminated EMI substantially but could only produce very satisfactory brain
imaging results when used together with conductive cloth and body surface electrode for EMI pickup.
The aforementioned active EMI elimination methods are based on a simple electromagnetic
phenomenon, that is, the relationship of EMI signals detected by EMI sensing coils and MRI receive
coil can be analytically characterized by the coupling or transfer functions among coils. However, in
realistic unshielded imaging environments, EMI signals could be emitted by various sources from
external environments as well as internal scanner electronics. Further, the EMI signals can change
dynamically due to EMI sources and surrounding environments with various nature and behaviors.
Such practical issues can complicate or degrade the performance of these analytical methods.
Intuitively, a deep learning driven method is preferable over the existing analytical approaches16-20
for more robust EMI prediction and elimination. This is because neural networks potentially offer
the ability of approximating the coupling relationships among coils from a subset of nonlinear
functions, thus robustly predicting EMI signals detected by MRI receive coils especially in presence
of complex external and internal EMI signals.