
V. I. Shmotolokha, M. F. Holovko
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), polarization spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
and viscometer. The phase behavior of the PBLG solution in DMF was also discussed in detail in [15, 16].
For the theoretical interpretation of the obtained phase behavior of the PBLG solution in DMF in
the first works [10, 11], the Flori lattice model was used [17, 18]. However, despite some qualitative
agreement between theoretical and experimental data, at a discrete representation of the solution in a
lattice consideration and unnatural interpretation of rod-like molecules, it is difficult to make a direct
comparison between the lattice model and real macromolecules. A more realistic non-lattice model for
describing the phase behavior of a PBLG solution in DMF was first proposed relatively recently in
the Jackson group [19]. In the proposed model, the PBLG solution is considered as a system of hard
spherocylinders with attraction in the form of an anisotropic potential well. This model is described in
the framework of the previously developed [20] approach, which combines the Onsager [21] approach
for describing rather long hard spherocylinders with the van der Waals approach that account for the
attractive interactions [22]. To consider the change in the conformation of the macromolecule PBLG, the
authors of [19] introduced the temperature dependence of the parameters of the spherocylinder and the
depth of the potential well with the appropriate fitting parameters. As a result, the authors were able to
reproduce the experimental phase diagram quite well. However, to describe the orientational ordering, the
authors used a trial function in the Onsager form [21], which significantly overestimates the orientational
ordering [23].
It should be indicated that all description of isotropic-nematic transition in non-spherical particles
since Onsager’s theory [21] can be considered as different variants of perturbative density functional
theory type. In all cases, the free energy of the considered systems is formulated with some approximation
as a functional of the orientation-dependent singlet distribution function 𝑓(Ω). The minimization of the
free energy (or grand canonical potential) of the singlet distribution function leads to a non-linear integral
equation for singlet distribution function, which can be solved numerically or by using the trial function
with the coefficients, which can be found by minimizing the free energy. An example of such an approach
was recently presented in [24], where for a description of thermodynamics of anisotropic systems of
particles with steric interactions there was used a formalism of functional density, which was founded
by [25, 26] and then generalized in the theories by van der Waals.
A well-studied phase diagram of a solution of PBLG in DMF could work as a good base model
for understanding the phase behavior in biopolymers. The next step should be to take into account
the biological environment, which is often seen as a porous environment [27]. This is the purpose
of the present work. The theoretical basis of the work is based on the works [28–30], in which the
generalization of van der Waals equation on anisotropic fluids in porous media is given. In contrast
to [20], the orientational ordering in the system is described through a corresponding integral equation
for the singlet distribution function, which is found by minimizing the free energy functional of the
system and its numerical solution on the basis of generalization [31].
2. Theory
As in [19, 20], we consider a model of hard spherocylinders with length 𝐿1and diameter 𝐷1with
attraction, which we choose to describe as an anisotropic potential well
𝑢attr (𝑟, Ω1,Ω2)=−[𝜖0+𝜖2𝑃2(cos 𝛾12)], 𝛾1𝐷1> 𝑟 > 𝜎 (Ω1,Ω2,Ω𝑟),
0, 𝑟 < 𝜎(Ω1,Ω2,Ω𝑟), 𝑟 > 𝛾1𝐷1,(2.1)
where 𝜖0and 𝜖2characterize isotropic and anisotropic parts of the attractive interaction respectively,
𝛾1=1+𝐿1/𝐷1,𝑃2(cos 𝛾12)=1/2(3 cos2𝛾12 −1)is the second order Legendre polynomial of relative
orientation, 𝛾12 is the angle between two principal axes of two spherocylinders. We hope that the reader
will not confuse the angle 𝛾12 with notation 𝛾1=1+𝐿1/𝐷1.𝜎(Ω1,Ω2,Ω𝑟)is the orientation-dependent
contact distance of two particles, Ω1and Ω2are orientations of two particles 1 and 2, Ω = (𝜃, 𝜙)
denotes the orientations of particles, which are defined by the polar angles 𝜃and 𝜙.Ω𝑟is defined by the
angles between the fixed system of coordinates and the system of coordinates, which moved with two
considered particles. In terms of 𝜎(Ω1,Ω2,Ω𝑟), the repulsive part of the interaction 𝑢rep (𝑟12,Ω1,Ω2)for
hard particles can be represented in the form
33602-2