Graded sum formula for A1-Soergel calculus and the nil-blob algebra.

2025-04-22 0 0 1.41MB 36 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Graded sum formula for ˜
A1-Soergel calculus and the nil-blob algebra.
Marcelo Hern´andez Caroand Steen Ryom-Hansen
Abstract
We study the representation theory of the Soergel calculus algebra ˜
AC
w:= EndD(W,S)(w) over Cin type ˜
A1. We
generalize the recent isomorphism between the nil-blob algebra NBnand a diagrammatically definied subalgebra
AC
wof ˜
AC
wto deal with the two-parameter blob algebra. Under this generalization, the two parameters correspond
to the two simple roots for ˜
A1. Using this, together with calculations involving the Jones-Wenzl idempotents for
the Temperley-Lieb subalgebra of NBn, we obtain a concrete diagonalization of the matrix of the bilinear form
on the cell module ∆w(v) for ˜
AC
w. The entries of the diagonalized matrices turn out to be products of roots for
˜
A1. We use this to study Jantzen type filtrations of ∆w(v) for ˜
AC
w. We show that, at an enriched Grothendieck
group level, the corresponding sum formula has terms ∆w(sαv)[l(sαv)l(v)], where [·] denotes grading shift.
1 Introduction
Cellular algebras were introduced by Graham and Lehrer in 1994 in the paper [15] as a framework for studying the
non-semisimple representation theory of many finite dimensional algebras,
The motivating examples for cellular algebras were the Iwahori-Hecke algebras of type Anand Temperley-Lieb
algebras, but it has since been realized that many other finite dimensional algebras fit into this framework. For a
cellular algebra one has a family of cell modules {∆(λ)}, endowed with bilinear forms ⟨·,·⟩λ, that together control
the representation theory of the algebra in question. Unfortunately, the concrete analysis of these bilinear forms is
in general difficult, but in this paper we give a non-trivial cellular algebra over Cfor which the bilinear forms ⟨·,·⟩λ
can in fact be diagonalized over an integral form of the algebra, thus solving all relevant questions concerning them,
and therefore, by cellular algebra theory, concerning the representation theory of the algebra itself.
Our cellular algebra has two origins. Firstly it arises in the diagrammatic Soergel calculus of the Coxeter system
(W, S) of type ˜
A1as the endomorphism algebra ˜
AC
w:= End(w) of w:= stst· · · of length n, where S={s,t}. An
approach to Soergel calculus of universal Coxeter groups, in particular of type ˜
A1, has been developed recently by
Elias and Libedinsky in [10], see also [8]. For type ˜
A1this approach involves the two-colour Temperley-Lieb algebra
but unfortunately the two-colour Temperley-Lieb algebra only captures the degree zero part of ˜
AC
w, whereas our
interests lie in the full grading on ˜
AC
w.
The second origin of our cellular algebra is as a certain idempotent truncation NBn1of Martin and Saleur’s
blob-algebra from [28]. In [26] the algebras ˜
AC
wand NBn1were studied extensively and in particular presentations in
terms of generators and relations were found for each of them. Using this it was shown that there is an isomorphism
AC
w
=NBn1where AC
wis a natural diagrammatically defined subalgebra of ˜
AC
w, whose dimension is half the
dimension of ˜
AC
w. On the other hand, we show in this paper that the representation theory of ˜
AC
wcan be completely
recovered from the representation theory of AC
w.
Similarly to the original blob-algebra, the diagrammatics for NBn1is given by blobbed (marked) Temperley-
Lieb diagrams, as in the following examples
,(1.1)
although the rule for multiplying diagrams is different. Following [26], we call NBn1the nil-blob algebra, but in
fact NBn1has also appeared in the literature under the name the dotted Temperley-Lieb algebra, see [35]. In [35]
it was shown that the associated dotted Temperley-Lieb category is equivalent to the Bar-Natan category of the
thickened annulus and this equivalence was used in the recent work [18] to construct a Kirby color for Khovanov
homology.
Supported in part by beca ANID-PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2019-21190827
Supported in part by FONDECYT grant 1221112
1
arXiv:2210.03847v3 [math.RT] 8 Nov 2023
An important feature of ˜
AC
wand NBn1, and in fact of all cellular algebras appearing in this paper, is the fact
that they are Z-graded algebras, with explicitly given degree functions defined in terms of the diagrams. They are
Z-graded cellular in the sense of Hu and Mathas, see [20].
In this paper our first new result is a construction of integral forms Awand Bx,y
n1for AC
wand NBn1over the
two-parameter polynomial algebra R:= C[x, y] and a lift of the isomorphism AC
w
=NBn1to Aw
=Bx,y
n1. The
integral form Awis in fact already implicit in the setup for Soergel calculus, using the dual geometric realization
of the Coxeter group Wof type ˜
A1. Under this realization, the parameters xand ycorrespond to the two simple
roots for W. The integral form for NBn1is also a well-known object, since it is simply the two-parameter blob-
algebra Bx,y
n1with blob-parameter xand marked loop parameter y. Thus the novelty of our result lies primarily
in the isomorphism between these integral forms, which on the other hand has the quite surprising consequence of
rendering a Coxeter group theoretical meaning to the two blob algebra parameters for Bx,y
n1, since they become
nothing but the simple roots for W.
Our main interests lies in the representation theory of Awwhich via the above isomorphism is equivalent to the
representation theory of Bx,y
n1. For several reasons the representation theory of Bx,y
n1is more convenient to handle.
Both algebras are cellular algebras with diagrammatically defined cellular bases, but the straightening rules for
expanding the product of two cellular basis elements in terms of the cellular basis are easier in the Bx,y
n1setting.
Secondly, there is a natural Temperley-Lieb subalgebra TLn1of Bx,y
n1whose associated restriction functor Res is
very useful for our purposes. We show in section 4 of our paper that Res maps a cell module ∆B
n1(λ) for Bx,y
n1to
a module with a cell module filtration for TLn1and that the sections of this filtration induce a diagonalization of
the bilinear form ⟨·,·⟩B
n1on ∆B
n1(λ).
This leaves us with the task of calculating the values of the bilinear form on these sections. For λ0 and
n1 = 2k+λwe show that this task is equivalent to calculating the coefficient of the identity
12λ
in the
expansion of
1k1
λ
JWn1
2 2
(1.2)
where JWn1is the Jones-Wenzl idempotent for TLn1. Similarly, for λ < 0 and n1 = 2k+|λ|it is equivalent
to calculating the coefficient of
12|λ|
in the expansion of
1k1
JWn1
2 2 |λ|
.
(1.3)
The determination of these coefficients constitutes the main calculatory ingredient of our paper and is done in
section 5. The result is given in Theorem 5.1 for λ0 and in Theorem 5.2 for λ < 0. Although one may possibly
not have expected Coxeter theory to appear in this calculation, the result turns out to be a nice product of positive
roots for W.
This work is partially motivated by the paper [36] by the second author in which a diagonalization of the
bilinear form for the cell module for ˜
Awis obtained, in fact the results of [36] are valid for a general Coxeter system.
Unfortunately, as was already mentioned in [36], the diagonalization process in that paper does not work over R
itself, but only over the fraction field Qof R, since it relies on certain Jucys-Murphy elements for Awthat are of
degree 2, and not 0. As a consequence the Z-graded structure on the cell module for ˜
Awbreaks down under the
diagonalization process in [36]. The diagonalization process of the present paper, however, which is based on the
Jones-Wenzl idempotents that are of degree 0, resolves this problem at least for type ˜
A1.
In the final section 7 of the paper we use the results of the previous sections to set up a version ∆gr,C
w(v)
gr,1,C
w(v)gr,2,C
w(v). . . of the Jantzen filtration formalism for the graded cell module ∆gr,C
w(v), using the
2
bilinear form ⟨·,·⟩v
won ∆gr,C
w(v). Since ⟨·,·⟩v
wis a graded bilinear form, this filtration consists of graded submodules
of ∆gr,C
w(v), and in our final Corollary 7.12 we show that the following identity holds at enriched Grothendieck group
level X
k>0
gr,k,C
W0(v)q=X
α>0
v<sαvw
gr,C
W0(sαv)[l(sαv)l(v)]q(1.4)
where α > 0 refers to the positive roots for Wand [·] to grading shift. This is our graded Jantzen sum formula.
Analogues of (ungraded) Jantzen filtrations with associated sum formulas exist in many module categories of Lie
type and give information on the irreducible modules for the category in question, see for example [1], [2], [30]. But
although graded representation theories in Lie theory have been known since the beginning of the nineties, see for
example [3], [4], [12], [13], [19], [27] and [38], to our knowledge graded sum formulas in the sense of (1.4) have so
far not been available, even though they would be very useful for calculating decomposition numbers. We believe
(1.4) gives an interesting indication of the possible form of graded sum formulas in representation theory.
The layout of the paper is as follows. In the next section we introduce the notation that shall be used throughout
the paper and recall the various algebras that play a role throughout: the Temperley-Lieb algebra TLn, the blob
algebra Bx,y
n, the nil-blob algebra NBnand the Soergel algebra ˜
Aw. We also recall how each of them fits into the
cellular algebra language. In section 3 we introduce the subalgebra Awof ˜
Awand show the isomorphism Bx,y
n1
=Aw
that was mentioned above. We also show how the cellular algebra structure on ˜
Awinduces a cellular structure on
Awand that there is an isomorphism ∆B
n1(λ)
=w(v) between the respective cell modules for Bx,y
n1and Aw.
In section 4 we consider a natural filtration of Res∆B
n(λ) where Res is the restriction functor from Bx,y
n1-modules
to TLn1-modules. We show that the Jones-Wenzl idempotents JWkfor TLkwhere kn1 can be used to
construct sections for this filtration and to diagonalize the bilinear form ⟨·,·⟩B
n1on ∆B
n1(λ). In section 5 we prove
the key Theorems 5.1 and 5.2, that were already mentioned above. They allow us to give concrete expressions for
the diagonal elements of the matrix for ⟨·,·⟩B
n1, which, as already mentioned, turn out to be products of positive
roots αfor W. In section 6 we give a description of the reflections sαin Wthat correspond to the positive roots of
section 5. Finally, in section 7 we use the results of the previous sections to give the graded Jantzen filtration with
corresponding graded sum formula.
The authors wish to express their gratitude to P. Wedrich for useful conversations and for pointing out that the
nil-blob algebra and the dotted Temperley-Lieb algebra are the same. They also wish to thank the two anonymous
referees for detailed reports that greatly helped improving the presentation and accuracy of the paper.
2 Blob algebras and Soergel calculus for ˜
A1
Throughout we use as ground field the complex numbers C, although several of our results hold in greater generality.
We set
R:= C[x, y].(2.1)
We consider Rto be a (non-negatively) Z-graded C-algebra via
deg(x) = deg(y)=2.(2.2)
In this paper we shall consider several diagram algebras. Possibly the oldest and most studied diagram algebra
is the Temperley-Lieb algebra. It arose in statistical mechanics in the seventies. In the present paper we shall use
the following variation of it.
Definition 2.1. The Temperley-Lieb algebra TLnwith loop-parameter 2is the R-algebra on the generators
U1,...,Un1subject to the relations
U2
i=2Uiif 1i<n (2.3)
UiUjUi=Uiif |ij|= 1 (2.4)
UiUj=UjUiif |ij|>1.(2.5)
The blob algebra was introduced by Martin and Saleur in [28], as a a way of considering boundary conditions in
the statistical mechanical model of the Temperley-Lieb algebra. Since its introduction, the blob algebra has been
the subject of much research activity in mathematics as well as physics, see for example [14], [27], [29], [31], [32],
[33], [34]. In this paper, we shall use the following variation of it.
3
Definition 2.2. The two-parameter blob algebra Bx,y
n, or more precisely the blob algebra with loop-parameter 2,
marked loop parameter yand blob-parameter x, is the R-algebra on the generators U0,U1,...,Un1subject to the
relations
U2
i=2Uiif 1i<n (2.6)
UiUjUi=Uiif |ij|= 1 and i, j > 0 (2.7)
UiUj=UjUiif |ij|>1 (2.8)
U1U0U1=yU1(2.9)
U2
0=xU0.(2.10)
The nil-blob algebra NBn, that was introduced and studied extensively in [26], may be recovered from Bx,y
nvia
specialization, that is
NBn
=Bx,y
nRC(2.11)
where Cis made into an R-algebra via x7→ 0 and y7→ 0. In other words, Bx,y
nmay be considered a deformation of
NBn, and in fact this shall be the point of view of the present paper.
Another interesting specialization of Bx,y
nis e
Tndefined as e
Tn:= Bx,y
nRCwhere Cis made into an R-algebra
via x7→ 1 and y7→ −2. Let I:= U01be the two-sided ideal in e
Tngenerated by U01. Then
Tn:= e
Tn/I(2.12)
is the Temperley-Lieb algebra from Definition 2.1, but defined over C.
Just as is the case for NBn, one easily checks that Bx,y
nis a Z-graded algebra.
Lemma 2.3. The rules deg(Ui)=0for i > 0and deg(U0) = 2 define a (non-negative) Z-grading on Bx,y
n.
Proof. The relations are easily seen to be homogeneous with respect to deg.
As already indicated, TLnand Bx,y
nare diagram algebras. This fact plays an important role in our paper, and
let us briefly explain it. The diagram basis for TLnconsists of Temperley-Lieb diagrams on npoints, which are
planar pairings between nnorthern points and nsouthern points of a rectangle. The diagram basis for Bx,y
nconsists
of blobbed (marked) Temperley-Lieb diagrams on npoints, or blob diagrams on npoints, which are marked planar
pairings between nnorthern points and nsouthern points of a rectangle, where only pairings exposed to the left
side of the rectangle may be marked, and at most once. There is thus a natural embedding of Temperley-Lieb
diagrams into blob diagrams. The multiplication D1D2of two diagrams D1and D2is given by concatenation of
them, with D2on top of D1. This concatenation process may give rise to internal marked or unmarked loops, as
well as diagrams with more than one mark. Internal unmarked loops are removed from a diagram by multiplying
it by 2, whereas internal marked loops are removed from a diagram by multiplying it by y. Finally, any diagram
with r > 1 marks on a diagram is set equal to the same diagram multiplied by xr1, but with the (r1) extra
marks removed. For example, for
D1=, D2= (2.13)
we have that
D1D2= = x2y
.
(2.14)
Later on, we shall give many more examples.
For the proof of the isomorphisms between Bx,y
nand its diagrammatic version, one may consult the appendix
of [9] or else adapt the more self-contained proof given in [26], and similarly for TLn. Under the isomorphism we
have that
17→ (2.15)
4
and that
U07→ ,Ui7→
i
.
(2.16)
The number of Temperley-Lieb diagrams and blob diagrams on npoints is the Catalan number 1
n+1 2n
nand 2n
n.
In particular TLnand Bx,y
nare free over Rof rank
rk TLn=1
n+ 12n
nand rk Bx,y
n=2n
n.(2.17)
All algebras considered in the present paper fit into the general language of cellular algebras, introduced by
Graham and Lehrer.
Definition 2.4. Let Abe a finite dimensional algebra over a commutative ring kwith unity. Then a cellular basis
structure for Aconsists of a triple ,Tab, C)such that Λis a poset, Tab is a function on Λwith values in finite
sets and C:`λΛTab(λ)×Tab(λ)→ A is an injection such that
{Cλ
st |s, t Tab(λ), λ Λ}
is a k-basis for A: the cellular basis for A. The rule (Cλ
st):= Cλ
ts defines a k-linear antihomomorphism of Aand
the structure constants for Awith respect to {Cλ
st}satisfy the following condition with respect to the partial order:
for all a∈ A we have
aCλ
st =X
uTab(λ)
rusaCλ
ut +lower terms
where lower terms means a linear combination of Cµ
ab where µ < λ and where rusa k.
To make TLnfit into this language we choose k=R, Λ = Λn:= {n, n 2,...,1}(or Λ := Λn={n, n
2,...,2,0}) if nis odd (or even), with poset structure inherited from Z. For λΛnwe choose Tab(λ) to be
Temperley-Lieb half-diagrams with λpropagating lines, that is Temperley-Lieb diagrams on λnorthern and n
southern points in which each northern point is paired with a southern point. For s, t Tab(λ) we define Cλ
st to be
the diagram obtained from gluing sand the horizontal reflection of t, with son the bottom. Here is an example of
this gluing process with n= 8 and s, t Tab(2).
(s, t) =
,
!7→
.
(2.18)
Theorem 2.5. The above triple n,Tab, C)makes TLninto a cellular algebra.
Proof: This follows directly from the definitions.
To make Bx,y
nfit into the cellular algebra language we choose k=R, Λ = {Λ±n:= n, ±(n2),...,±1}(or
Λ := Λ±n=n, ±(n2),...,±2,0}) if nis odd (or even), with poset structure given by λ<µif |λ|<|µ|or if
|λ|=|µ|and λ<µ. For example, for n= 6 we have
Λ±6:= 6,±4,±2,0},0<2<2<4<4<6<6 (2.19)
For λΛ±nwe choose Tab(λ) to be blob half-diagrams with |λ|propagating lines, that is marked Temperley-Lieb
diagrams on |λ|northern and nsouthern points in which each northern point is paired with a southern point and
in which only non-propagating pairings exposed to the left side of the rectangle may be marked. For s, t Tab(λ)
we define Cλ
st to be the diagram obtained from gluing sand the horizontal reflection of t, with son the bottom,
and marking the leftmost propagating line if λ < 0. Here is an example of this gluing process with n= 8 and
s, t Tab(2).
(s, t) =
,
!7→
.
(2.20)
With this notation we have the following Theorem.
5
摘要:

Gradedsumformulafor˜A1-Soergelcalculusandthenil-blobalgebra.MarceloHern´andezCaro∗andSteenRyom-Hansen†AbstractWestudytherepresentationtheoryoftheSoergelcalculusalgebra˜ACw:=EndD(W,S)(w)overCintype˜A1.Wegeneralizetherecentisomorphismbetweenthenil-blobalgebraNBnandadiagrammaticallydefiniedsubalgebraAC...

展开>> 收起<<
Graded sum formula for A1-Soergel calculus and the nil-blob algebra..pdf

共36页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:36 页 大小:1.41MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-22

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 36
客服
关注