
2
is (111)-oriented and cut to a cuboid shape with dimensions
Lx=2.5 mm, Ly=1.5 mm, and Lz=0.8 mm. It was grown by
a chemical vapor transport method15(for details on the crystal
orientation of the CSO and the sample preparation see Sup-
plemental Material I and II35). We place the CSO/Py hybrid
on top of a coplanar waveguide (CPW) with a center conduc-
tor width of w=127µm as shown in Fig. 1 (a). The CPW is
connected to two ports P1 and P2 of a vector network analyzer
(VNA), which measures the change of transmission from P1
to P2 defined as the complex transmission parameter S21 as a
function of frequency fand external magnetic field µ0Hat a
fixed microwave power of 1 mW (0 dBm). We then place the
CPW/CSO/Py assembly into the variable temperature insert
of a superconducting 3D-vector magnet. By applying a static
external magnetic field µ0Hin the plane of the Py thin film
and setting the temperature to 5 K we can access the helical
(H), conical (C), and ferrimagnetic (F)phases of the CSO as
schematically depicted in Fig. 1 (b).
FIG. 2. Measured broadband ferromagnetic resonance spectrum of
the CSO/Py sample at 5 K as a function of the frequency f. The
fixed external magnetic field µ0H=120 mT is applied along the
x-axis (φH=0◦) as indicated in the sample sketches. (a) The CSO
crystal faces the CPW. Thus, only ferrimagnetic CSO modes apppear
(grey marked frequency range). (b) The Py thin film faces the CPW.
In addition to the CSO modes the Py FMR mode appears at high
frequencies as well as a hybrid mode (HM) at medium frequencies
(inset). This HM is attributed to the spin dynamics at the interface
of the CSO/Py sample, indicated as an interfacial layer in the sample
sketch.
As a reference measurement, we first place the CSO/Py hy-
brid sample on the CPW with the Py facing away from the
CPW. Due to the large thickness of the CSO layer, the oscil-
lating magnetic field generated by the CPW does not reach
the Py layer. In this way, we only excite the magnetization
in CSO itself with no influence of the Py layer. We apply a
fixed external magnetic field µ0H=120 mT along the x-
axis (φH=0◦) at 5 K, as illustrated schematically in the top
panel of Fig. 2 (a). For this temperature and external mag-
netic field strength the CSO magnetization is in the field po-
larized phase. To correct for the microwave background of
the complex transmission parameter S21 we use the derivative
divide method36, to obtain the field derivative of the complex
transmission parameter ∂S21
∂Hdevided by S21. On the bottom
panel of Fig. 2 (a) Re(∂DS21/∂H)for the CPW/CSO/Py as-
sembly at 5 K is shown as a function of the frequency f. In
the grey marked frequency range several resonances appear.
These are attributed to the excitation of magnetostatic modes
of the cuboid-shaped CSO crystal. In the frequency range
7 GHz < f< 12 GHz no additional modes are observed (inset).
After determining the response of the isolated CSO magneti-
zation dynamics, we place the CSO/Py hybrid on the CPW
with the Py facing the CPW and again apply a fixed magnetic
field µ0H=120 mT along the x-axis as schematically shown
in the top panel of Fig. 2 (b). Now, the field generated by the
CPW interacts with the Py layer as well as the CSO as the
Py layer is a thin film. In the bottom panel of Fig. 2 (b),
Re(∂DS21/∂H)at 5 K is shown for the CPW/Py/CSO as-
sembly as a function of the frequency f. In addition to the
resonance lines of CSO (grey marked frequency range) also
the Py FMR line appears close to 10 GHz as expected. The
change in the CSO mode spectrum is attributed to the pres-
ence of the metallic film and concomitant shielding of the mi-
crowave field in the bulk of CSO. Furthermore, we observe
an additional medium frequency mode, which is shifted by
about 1 GHz to lower frequencies than the Py FMR mode.
This hybrid mode (HM) is also observed in the CSO/Py hy-
brid in the conical phase of CSO (see Fig. 6 in Supplemental
Material35). For the dependence of the HM on the magni-
tude of the external magnetic field see Supplemental Material
III35. We attribute the appearance of this additional mode to
the spin dynamics at the CSO/Py interface. Thus, in a simpli-
fied macrospin picture, we may treat our bilayer as a trilayer
with a new interfacial layer inheriting properties from both
sides. The HM is then modelled as a result of macrospin dy-
namics of the interlayer as discussed in the following.
To investigate the dependence of the HM on the direction
of the external magnetic field we apply a field with a fixed
magnitude of µ0H=120 mT and rotate the field direction
by 360◦in the Py film plane. For a quantitative analysis of the
HM we simultaneously fit the Py FMR peak and the HM peak
in the frequency domain of the transmission parameter S21 for
each fixed external field direction (for detailed informations
on the fit model see Supplemental Material IV35). In Fig. 3
three exemplary fits of the frequency spectrum are shown for
a fixed magnitude of the field µ0H=120 mT and for different
directions under which it was applied. In Fig. 3 (a) the exter-
nal field is applied in the Py thin film plane along the x-axis
as schematically depicted at the top of Fig. 3 (a). We find the
peak of the hybrid mode at 9.2 GHz, which has a small am-
plitude compared to the Py FMR peak-dip at 10.4 GHz. In
Fig. 3 (b) we show the fit result for the field applied under
an angle φH=30◦with respect to the x-axis as depicted at
the top of Fig. 3 (b). Now, the two resonance frequencies of
the Py mode and the HM are less separated than in Fig. 3 (a),
as the hybrid mode moved to higher frequencies and the Py
mode to lower frequencies. In Fig. 3 (c) the field is applied
under an angle φH=60◦. The two resonance frequencies
of the Py mode and the HM are not separable anymore as the