TC, 1999, 5(1) 2
That was important, because some of the factors that were significant in specific coun-
tries appeared to be of no importance in other countries. This pointed at the importance of
contextual factors. Furthermore, international comparative research on student outcomes
showed the need to search for factors within classrooms and schools and other levels of
the educational system, that may cause differences between student outcomes within and
between countries.
In our research in The Netherlands, it also became obvious that educational effective-
ness research and theory provide useful instruments for evaluation research. We use de-
signs based on educational effectiveness approach for the evaluation of different school
reforms in The Netherlands, similar to studies done in the USA and the UK (Werf 1995).
Based on intellectual curiosity ( into characteristics of effective schools across countries)
and our experiences in basic projects in the country, it was a challenge to take part in the
evaluation of the Primary Education Quality Improvement Project (PEQIP) in Indonesia,
using our knowledge base and methodology in educational effectiveness research. In
addition to the research questions related to the PEQIP evaluation, i.e. the assessment of
the impact of PEQIP in Indonesia, the Groningen Institute for Educational Research
formulated the following questions: Do factors related to effectiveness travel across
countries and is it possible to use more or less the same research methodology for
evaluation of this kind of projects in developing societies?
In the following sections the design of the evaluation study and the results will be
described shortly. In addition, we will address whether educational effectiveness and im-
provement can work in developing societies, and which lessons can be drawn from our
experience in this project.
2The History of Educational Effectiveness Research and Improvement
The history of educational effectiveness research can be described in different ways. A
favourite way is to look at educational effectiveness as a reaction to the quite pessimistic
views on teachers, schools and education in general, brought forward by the dis-
appointing results of research. Another, quite different interpretation of the history of
educational effectiveness research considers this research as a natural prolongation of re-
search from the past with respect to teaching, instruction, curriculum, school organisa-
tion, and so on. Depending on one’s views of history, different godfathers for educational
effectiveness research are named, like Coleman et al. (1966). For most educational
effectiveness research the work of Edmonds (1979) and Brookover, Beady, Flood and
Schweitzer (1979) in the United States, and of Rutter, Maughan, Mortimore and Ouston
(1979) in the United Kingdom are important starting points for educational effectiveness
research.
Those studies revealed that schools differ from each other with respect to the out-
comes they generate for comparable groups of students. This holds for academic out-
comes as well as other outcomes ( attitudes towards school, motivation, juvenile de-
linquency, etc.). The crucial question is what kind of characteristics distinguish effective
schools from less effective ones.
Table 1: Effective Schools’ Characteristics Identified in Two Recent Reviews
Levine and Lezotte (1990) Characteristics Sammons, Hillman and Mortimore (1995) Factors
1. Outstanding Leadership
a. Superior Instructional Leadership
b. Support for Teachers
c. High Expenditure of Time and Energy for School
Improvement
d. Vigorous Selection and Replacement of Teachers
1. Professional Leadership
a. The Leading Professional
b. A Participative Approach
c. Firm and Purposeful