
SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF AN ACOUSTIC-ELASTIC TRANSMISSION EIGENVALUE PROBLEM 3
where viis an entire solution to (∆ + m2)vi= 0 in RNwith m:= ω/cband cb:= pκ/ρb.
The last condition in (1.6) signifies that the scattered field vs:= vt−visatisfies
lim
r→∞ r(N−1)/2(∂rvs−imvs) = 0, r := |x|.(1.7)
The well-posedness of the forward problem (1.6) is known. In the physical setup, (Ω; ˜
λ, ˜µ, ρe)
signifies an elastic body which is embedded in a fluid whose acoustic property is characterized
by κand ρb.videnotes an incident acoustic wave with ω∈R+being its angular frequency and
its impingement on the elastic body generates the scattering phenomenon where the elastic
response inside the elastic body is governed by the first equation in (1.6) and the acoustic wave
propagation outside Ω is governed by the second equation in (1.6). The elastic and acoustic
fields are coupled together via the transmission conditions across ∂Ω. An inverse problem of
practical importance in sonar technology is to identify the solid structure Ω by knowledge of
the acoustic field vsaway from Ω. It is clear that if vs≡0, i.e. vt=viin RN\Ω, the solid
body is invisible with respect to the acoustic scanning by using vi. In such a case, one can
directly verify that v=vi|Ωand ufulfils (1.4), namely they form a pair of AE transmission
eigenfunctions. That is, if invisibility occurs, the scattering pattern, namely the perturbative
wave pattern, is trapped inside the solid body. Hence, in order to understand the invisibility
phenomenon, one needs to study the AE transmission eigenvalue problem (1.4). In fact, by
following a similar argument in [4] for the acoustic transmission eigenvalue problem, one can
show that if (v, u) is a pair of AE transmission eigenfunctions, then vcan be extended by the
Herglotz approximation to form an incident field whose impingement on Ω generates a nearly-
vanishing scattered field. Hence, our results on the existence of AE transmission eigenvalues
indicates that (near) invisibility is not a sporadic phenomenon. Moreover, our results on
the boundary localization properties of the AE transmission eigenfunctions characterize the
quantitative behaviours of both the elastic and acoustic fields when (near) invisibility occurs.
It is also interesting to note the mono-localized eigen-modes (i.e. vis boundary-localized
but uis not) can be used for the design of one-way information transmission in that the
acoustic observable is void outside the solid, but the elastic observable inside the solid is non-
void. Finally, we would like to mention that the spectral pattern of boundary localization
was recently investigated in [8,12] for the acoustic transmission eigenfunctions and it has
been used to produce a super-resolution scheme for acoustic imaging. By following a similar
spirit, one can also use the spectral pattern discovered in the current article to develop novel
imaging scheme for the fluid-structure interaction problem. We shall consider these and other
developments in a forthcoming paper.
Next, we consider the elastodynamics in bubbly elastic media. For simplicity, we consider
the case with a single air bubble (Ω; κ, ρe) embedded in an elastic medium (RN\Ω; ˜
λ, ˜µ, ρb).
The linear elastic deformation is governed by the following PDE system (cf. [30]):
L˜
λ,˜µut(x) + ω2ρeut(x) = 0 in RN\Ω,
∇ · (1
ρb∇v(x)) + ω2
κv(x) = 0 in Ω,
ut(x)·ν=1
ρbω2∇v(x)·ν, T˜νut=−v(x)νon ∂Ω,
ut−uisatisfies the Kupradze radiation condition,
(1.8)
where uiis an entire solution to L˜
λ,˜µui+ω2ρeui= 0 in RN. The Kupradze radiation condition
is given by decomposing the elastic field us:= ut−uiinto its shear and compressional parts
and requiring that each part fulfils the Sommerfeld radiation condition (1.7); see e.g. [28,29]
for a more detailed description. Clearly, one can consider the invisibility issue for (1.8) and
the identically vanishing of usleads again to the transmission eigenvalue problem (1.4) with
u=ui|Ω. However, we are more interested in understanding under what conditions such