It is begging the question to protest that the class of people who a generation ago read nothing now at least
read novels, and to regard this as a change for the better. By similar logic it would be more wholesome to
breakfast off laudanum than to omit the meal entirely. The nineteenth century, in fact, by making education
popular, has produced in America the curious spectacle of a reading−public with essentially nonliterary
tastes. Formerly, better books were published, because they were intended for persons who turned to reading
through a natural bent of mind; whereas the modern American novel of commerce is addressed to us average
people who read, when we read at all, in violation of every innate instinct.
Such grounds as yet exist for hopefulness on the part of those who cordially care for belles lettres are to be
found elsewhere than in the crowded market− places of fiction, where genuine intelligence panders on all
sides to ignorance and indolence. The phrase may seem to have no very civil ring; but reflection will assure
the fair−minded that two indispensable requisites nowadays of a pecuniarily successful novel are, really, that
it make no demand upon the reader's imagination, and that it rigorously refrain from assuming its reader to
possess any particular information on any subject whatever. The author who writes over the head of the
public is the most dangerous enemy of his publisherand the most insidious as well, because so many
publishers are in private life interested in literary matters, and would readily permit this personal foible to
influence the exercise of their vocation were it possible to do so upon the preferable side of bankruptcy.
But publishers, among innumerable other conditions, must weigh the fact that no novel which does not deal
with modern times is ever really popular among the serious−minded. It is difficult to imagine a tale whose
action developed under the rule of the Caesars or the Merovingians being treated as more than a literary hors
d'oeuvre. We purchasers of "vital" novels know nothing about the period, beyond a hazy association of it with
the restrictions of the schoolroom; our sluggish imaginations instinctively rebel against the exertion of
forming any notion of such a period; and all the human nature that exists even in serious−minded persons is
stirred up to resentment against the book's author for presuming to know more than a potential patron. The
book, in fine, simply irritates the serious−minded person; and shefor it is only women who willingly brave
the terrors of department−stores, where most of our new books are bought nowadaysquite naturally puts it
aside in favor of some keen and daring study of American life that is warranted to grip the reader. So,
modernity of scene is everywhere necessitated as an essential qualification for a book's discussion at the
literary evenings of the local woman's club; and modernity of scene, of course, is almost always fatal to the
permanent worth of fictitious narrative.
It may seem banal here to recall the truism that first−class art never reproduces its surroundings; but such
banality is often justified by our human proneness to shuffle over the fact that many truisms are true. And this
one is pre−eminently indisputable: that what mankind has generally agreed to accept as first−class art in any
of the varied forms of fictitious narrative has never been a truthful reproduction of the artist's era. Indeed, in
the higher walks of fiction art has never reproduced anything, but has always dealt with the facts and laws of
life as so much crude material which must be transmuted into comeliness. When Shakespeare pronounced his
celebrated dictum about art's holding the mirror up to nature, he was no doubt alluding to the circumstance
that a mirror reverses everything which it reflects.
Nourishment for much wildish speculation, in fact, can be got by considering what the world's literature
would be, had its authors restricted themselves, as do we Americans so sedulouslyand unavoidablyto
writing of contemporaneous happenings. In fiction−making no author of the first class since Homer's infancy
has ever in his happier efforts concerned himself at all with the great "problems" of his particular day; and
among geniuses of the second rank you will find such ephemeralities adroitly utilized only when they are
distorted into enduring parodies of their actual selves by the broad humor of a Dickens or the colossal fantasy
of a Balzac. In such cases as the latter two writers, however, we have an otherwise competent artist
handicapped by a personality so marked that, whatever he may nominally write about, the result is, above all
else, an exposure of the writer's idiosyncrasies. Then, too, the laws of any locale wherein Mr. Pickwick
achieves a competence in business, or of a society wherein Vautrin becomes chief of police, are upon the face
The Certain Hour
III 6