applied. And we have certainly had truly great story-
tellers, whose narrative architecture is solidly based,
soundly built, and well braced clear to tower-tip; but
more often than not, this is done completely with a
homogenized, nuts-and-bolts kind of prose. And there
has been a regrettably small handful of what I call "peo-
ple experts"—those especially gifted to create memor-
able characters, something more than real ones well-
photographed . . ...living ones who change, as all living
things change, not only during the reading, but in the
memory as the reader himself lives and changes and
becomes capable of bringing more of himself to that
which the writer has brought him. But there again, "peo-
ple experts" have a tendency to turn their rare gift into a
preoccupation (and create small ardent cliques who
tend to the same thing) and skimp on matters of struc-
ture and content. An apt analogy would be a play su-
perbly cast and skilfully mounted, for which somebody
had forgotten to supply a script.
And if you think I am about to say that Zeiazny de-
livers all these treasures and avoids all these oversights,
that he has full measures of substance and structure,
means and ends, texture, cadence and pace, you are
absolutely right.
Three factors in Zeiazny's work call for isolation and
examination; and the very cold-bloodedness of such a
declamation demands amendment. Let me revise it to
two and a pointing finger, a vague and inarticulate
wave toward something Out (or Up, or In) There
which can be analyzed about as effectively as the in-
ternal effect of watching the color-shift on the skin of a
bubble or that silent explosion somewhere inside the
midriff which is one of the recognitions of love.
First, Zeiazny's stories are fabulous. I use this word in
a special and absolutely accurate sense. Aesop did not,
and did not intend to, convey a factual account of an
improbably vegetarian fox equipped with speech and
with human value judgments concerning a bunch of un-
reachable grapes. He was saying something else and
something larger than what he said. And it has come to
me over the years that the greatness of literature and
the importance of literary entities (Captain Ahab, Billy
Budd, Hamlet, Job, Uriah Heep) really lies in this fabu-
lous quality. One may ponderously call them Jungian
archetypes, but one recognizes them, and/or their situ-
ational predicaments, in one's own daily contacts with
this landlord, that employer, and one's dearly beloved.
A fable says more than it says, is bigger than its own
parameters. Zeiazny always says more than he says; all
of his yams have applications, illuminate truths, donate
to the reader tools (and sometimes weapons) with
which he was not equipped before, and for which he can
find daily uses, quite outside the limits of his story.
Second, there is, as one reads more and more of this
extraordinary writer's work, a growing sense of excite-
ment, a gradual recognition of something which (in me,
file:///F|/rah/Roger%20Zelazny/Four%20For%20Tomorrow.txt (2 of 165) [8/27/03 11:35:08 PM]