
2. Contributions by Others
One of the noteworthy features of the novel CRYPTONOMICON is that it contains a new
cryptosystem invented by Bruce Schneier, called Solitaire (though in the actual text of the novel it
goes by a different name for a while). Bruce has written a technical appendix, printed in the back of
the book, giving a full description of Solitaire. Not only that, but Ian Goldberg has written a perl
script that encrypts and decrypts messages using the solitaire algorithm. The full text of Ian's perl
script appears in the body of the novel. Since Solitaire is strong enough to be export-controlled, this
means that when the text of the novel is rendered in electronic form it becomes an export-controlled
munition.
As Bruce explains in the appendix, Solitaire is specifically designed to offer security against
high-tech cryptanalysis, but it is implemented on a low-tech system: an ordinary deck of playing
cards. In other words, it is intended for use by people who are living under political regimes where
the possession of crypto tools (computers, crypto software, etc.) is itself grounds for confiscation,
punishment, etc.
What is a new cryptosystem like Solitaire doing in a novel? It is a mutually beneficial relationship. I
needed such a system to play a certain role in the book. But by including Bruce's full description of
the algorithm, and Ian's perl script, in the actual text of the novel, we can hopefully leverage the wide
publicity and distribution of the book to get this cryptosystem out to places it might not otherwise
reach.
3. What is up with the title?
It has been pointed out that the word "Cryptonomicon" bears obvious similarities to
"Cyphernomicon," which is the title of a cypherpunk FAQ document by Tim May. This leads to the
question of am I committing some form of plagiarism, or rendering homage, or what? The answer,
strangely enough, is neither. I was completely unaware of the existence of Tim May's
Cyphernomicon at the time I came up with "Cryptonomicon." According to the fictional storyline
that I have been writing, the original Cryptonomicon was written by an English scholar with a
Classical education (for those of you who are crypto history buffs, it is modeled after John Wilkins's
1641 book entitled Mercury). Accordingly, I wanted to give it a Latin-sounding title, and
"Cryptonomicon" is what I came up with. It is the sort of title that would blend in pretty well with
any 17th-Century English book list. According to all of the library and Web searches I have done
since then, the term "Cryptonomicon" has never appeared anywhere else.
Since becoming aware of the existence of Tim May's "Cyphernomicon" I have been in touch with
him about this near-collision in namespace. Of course I am not authorized to speak on his behalf, but
having had an exchange of messages with him, I am now going forward with the understanding that
he has no problems or complaints.
4. Does it mention Cypherpunks?
To write a novel about the modern-day crypto world without showing any awareness of the
Cypherpunk phenomenon would suggest carelessness or even dishonesty on the part of the author.
However, if I were a Cypherpunk, I would view this kind of attention as a double-edged sword.
Making members of some group into characters in a novel could be interpreted as a way of honoring