
A preprint - January 9, 2023
2.3 Outcomes for undergraduates
The choice of which flavor of associate’s degree to pursue has consequences for the two-year college student.
Many workforce roles for data scientists exist at the bachelor’s level (De Veaux et al. 2017; National Academies
of Science, Engineering, and Medicine 2018), and the number is growing (Gould et al. 2018).
For those who choose further study, the bachelor’s-to-master’s transition is characterized by flexibility and
adaptation, because graduate schools know that they will receive applications from students who attended a
wide variety of undergraduate schools, and who studied highly variable subjects therein. Moreover, bachelor’s
programs typically involve at least 120 credit hours of study, which often provides ample flexibility for a
student to deviate from any pre-defined curricular path. From our own experiences, we know that it is not
uncommon for a traditional bachelor’s student to major in say, economics, only to then decide before their
senior year that they want to pursue a master’s degree in data science, load up on statistics and computer
science courses in their senior year, and still put together a competitive graduate school application.
It is important to remember that dramatically less flexibility is available for the associate’s-to-bachelor’s
transition, since for two-year college students, every credit counts. We recognize that for most two-year college
students, any credit that doesn’t count towards their associate’s degree program or their pre-defined transfer
pathway may be considered a “waste” of both time and money. California has been a leader in fostering
smoother articulation of courses between two-year and four-year institutions (see
https://assist.org
). But
while the California system provides a clear solution for existing pathways, the larger difficulties with transfer
pathways are longstanding (Blumenstyk 2021). In Massachusetts, although most students who enroll in
two-year college program after high school intend to transfer to a bachelor’s degree program, relatively few
actually do so (Murnane et al. 2022).
Longer-term, alternative options, including associate’s-to-workforce programs (Rawlings-Goss et al. 2018;
Gould et al. 2018) are desirable but outside the scope of this paper. Associate’s programs in cybersecurity,
information technology, and web development—designed as terminal degrees—have proven effective in
workforce development and the same potential exists for data science.3
2.4 Data science curricula
Undergraduate curricula in data science are now beginning to coalesce. De Veaux et al. (2017) provide
curriculum guidelines for undergraduate majors in data science that are endorsed by the American Statistical
Association. The “Data Science for Undergraduates: Opportunities and Options” consensus study (National
Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine 2018) provided a number of recommendations and findings
relevant to undergraduate data science programs and outlined key aspects of data acumen. The Association for
Computing Machinery (ACM) Data Science Task Force enumerated computing competencies for undergraduate
data science curricula (Danyluk et al. 2021), and syllabi from example courses. Gould et al. (2018) provides
curricular guidelines for two-year college programs in data science. Comprehensive textbooks (Wickham and
Grolemund 2016; Baumer, Kaplan, and Horton 2021) and course materials (Çetinkaya-Rundel 2020) support
the teaching of a variety of different introductory data science courses. Donoho (2017) ruminates on the
nature of data science as a standalone scientific discipline.
In 2019, the National Center for Education Statistics unveiled a new series of Classification of Instructional
Programs (CIP) codes for data science (30.70). These new codes allow the federal government to track the
growth of programs in data science and should result in an improved ability to quantify how many students
are studying data science.4
In what might be an important stamp of legitimacy, ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and
Technology) has begun accrediting its first undergraduate data science programs, with plans to expand to the
graduate and associate’s levels.
3
In contrast to the 45,000 master’s graduates in data science referenced earlier, according to Statista (Duffin 2021),
there were more than a million associate’s degree recipients in the United States during the 2018-2019 academic
year.We believe that associate’s degree candidates represent an untapped data resource.
4
Until recently, the new CIP codes were not classified as STEM disciplines, which had negative implications for
the immigration status of international students. Efforts by the Academic Data Science Alliance and others led to
reclassification of the data science CIP code.
4