
Experimental determination of the E2-M1 polarizability of the strontium clock
transition
S. D¨orscher, J. Klose, S. Maratha Palli,∗and Ch. Lisdat†
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
(Dated: October 27, 2022)
To operate an optical lattice clock at a fractional uncertainty below 10−17, one must typically
consider not only electric-dipole (E1) interaction between an atom and the lattice light field when
characterizing the resulting lattice light shift of the clock transition but also higher-order multipole
contributions, such as electric-quadrupole (E2) and magnetic-dipole (M1) interactions. However,
strongly incompatible values have been reported for the E2-M1 polarizability difference of the clock
states (5s5p)3P0and (5s2)1S0of strontium [Ushijima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 263202 (2018);
Porsev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 063204 (2018)]. This largely precludes operating strontium
clocks with uncertainties of few 10−18, as the resulting lattice light shift corrections deviate by up
to 1 ×10−17 from each other at typical trap depths. We have measured the E2-M1 polarizability
difference using our 87Sr lattice clock and find a value of ∆αqm =−987+174
−223 µHz. This result is in
very good agreement with the value reported by Ushijima et al.
The interaction between the optical lattice and the
trapped atom plays an important role in optical clocks
with neutral atoms and has been investigated in several
publications: As the accuracy of optical lattice clocks in-
creases, one must take into account not only the electric-
dipole (E1) interaction between atom and laser field [1]
but also higher-order multipole interactions and two-
photon coupling [2–6]. In electric-dipole approximation,
the lattice light shift on the clock transition cancels for
all lattice depths if the lattice is operated at the magic
wavelength [1], but the higher-order contributions render
this general cancellation impossible. Lastly, the individ-
ual contributions to the lattice light shift depend intri-
cately on the motional state of the individual atom and
thus on the population distribution of the atoms in the
lattice [4, 5, 7].
Although the description of the light shift as a function
of lattice depth can be simplified [4], the necessary con-
ditions require careful testing and are not met in many
cases. In the general case, however, several atomic pa-
rameters need to be known accurately, including the dif-
ference of the polarizabilities by electric-quadrupole (E2)
and magnetic-dipole (M1) coupling, ∆αqm, at the given
lattice light frequency and polarisation. The most accu-
rate determinations of this atomic parameter for stron-
tium lattice clocks have been reported by Ushijima et al.
[5] using an experimental approach, where the different
contributions to the lattice light shift are separated by
their different dependences on the motional state of the
atoms and on the lattice light intensity, and by Porsev
et al. [6] based on atomic structure calculations. Worry-
ingly, these two values are extremely incompatible with
each other, as they differ by about twenty-two times their
combined standard uncertainty (see Fig. 4)
Given this discrepancy, it becomes difficult at best to
accurately correct for the lattice light shift at an uncer-
tainty of few 10−18 or less in units of the clock transition
frequency (referred to as fractional units hereafter): Us-
Δαqm
Porsev
Δαqm
Ushijima
-10 -5 0
fraconal lace light shi (10 -18)
Δαqm
Porsev
Δαqm
Ushijima
}
cold atoms
}
hot atoms
FIG. 1. Lattice light shifts estimated using either the value
of ∆αqm reported by Porsev et al. [6] or by Ushijima et al.
[5], for different models (dots: Ref. [4]; squares: Ref. [5]) and
experimental conditions (see text) when the lattice light shift
is equalized for trap depths of 77Erand 149Er.
ing either value of ∆αqm, the E2-M1 contribution to the
lattice light shift differs by about 1 ×10−17 in fractional
units (see Fig. 1) under typical conditions, including a
trap depth of around 100Er, where Er=h2/(2mλ2
m) is
the photon recoil energy at the lattice wavelength λm
for an atom of mass m, regardless of which light shift
model [4, 5] is used. Even in the motional ground state,
i.e., in the limit of zero temperature, the difference ex-
ceeds 3 ×10−18 for any reasonable [8, 9] lattice depth.
Hence, the discrepancy cannot be mitigated by operating
at lower lattice depth or by preparing the atomic sam-
ple closer to the motional ground state, e.g., by cooling
to sub-recoil temperatures as demonstrated recently for
ytterbium [10].
Here, we report on an independent experimental deter-
mination of ∆αqm(λm) of the clock transition in neutral
strontium (mF=±9/2, ∆mF= 0). Our measurement
procedure follows a similar approach as the one presented
in Ref. [5]. We measure the differential light shift be-
tween samples with different motional state distributions
at a fixed lattice depth in a new experimental apparatus
that uses the same interrogation laser [11] as our previ-
ous system [12] and a vertically oriented, one-dimensional
optical lattice. The procedure used to measure differen-
arXiv:2210.14727v1 [physics.atom-ph] 26 Oct 2022