Dynamic image recognition in a spiking neuron network supplied by astrocytes

2025-05-04 0 0 2.5MB 11 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Citation: Stasenko, S.V.; Kazantsev
V.B. Dynamic image recognition in a
spiking neuron network supplied by
astrocytes. Preprints 2022,1, 0.
https://doi.org/
Publishers Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Submitted to Preprints for possible
open access publication under
the terms and conditions of
the Creative Commons Attri-
bution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Article
Dynamic image recognition in a spiking neuron network
supplied by astrocytes
Sergey V. Stasenko 1* , and Victor B. Kazantsev 1
1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
*Correspondence: stasenko@neuro.nnov.ru
Abstract:
Mathematical model of spiking neuron network (SNN) supplied by astrocytes is investigated.
The astrocytes are specific type of brain cells which are not electrically excitable but inducing chemical
modulations of neuronal firing. We analyzed how the astrocytes influence on images encoded in the
form of dynamic spiking pattern of the SNN. Serving at much slower time scale the astrocytic network
interacting with the spiking neurons can remarkably enhance the image recognition quality. Spiking
dynamics was affected by noise distorting the information image. We demonstrated that the activation
of astrocyte can significantly suppress noise influence improving dynamic image representation by the
SNN.
Keywords: spiking neural network; neuron-glial interactions; astrocyte
1. Introduction
The construction of biologically relevant models of brain information processing still
remains one of the key tasks of modern mathematical neuroscience. In neurobiology, key mech-
anisms of information processing concern synaptic transmission between the brain network
neurons. Synaptic plasticity, e.g. adaptive changes in the connection strengths, is believed to be
the main instrument of implementation learning and memory in the neuron networks. Follow-
ing the neurobiological studies many mathematical models targeted to describe experimental
results and, hence, to imitate brain functions have been proposed. However, it is still remain
a challenge on how at network level brain circuits can generate so finely tuned and effective
information representation and processing.
In recent two decades neurobiological experiments have revealed that neurons and neu-
ronal networks are not alone in the brain universe. It was found that glial cells, particularly
astrocytes, known before as just “supporting” cells providing mostly metabolic functions, can
also participate in information processing by means of chemical regulations of neuronal activity
and synaptic transmission [
1
4
]. Inclusion of the third player, e.g. astrocytes, in the classical
“presynapse-postsynapse” signal transmission scheme led to the concept of a tripartite synapse
[
2
,
3
,
5
]. Astrocytes through calcium-dependent release of neuroactive chemicals (for example,
glutamate) affect the pre- and postsynaptic compartments of the synapse. When spikes are
generated by a presynaptic neuron, a neurotransmitter (for example, glutamate) is released
from the presynaptic terminal. By diffusion part of the chemicals leave synaptic cleft and bind
to metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) on the astrocyte, which may be located near
the presynaptic terminal. Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors G-mediated leads
to the formation of inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP
3
). This process after a cascade of molecular
transformations inside the astrocyte leads to the release of
Ca2+
into the cytoplasm. It induces
the release of the neuroactive chemicals called gliatransmitters (for example, glutamate, adeno-
sine triphosphate (ATP), D-serine, GABA) back to the extrasynaptic space. Next, they bind
to pre- or postsynaptic receptors resulting finally in modulation of the efficiency of synaptic
transmission completing the feedback loop [6].
arXiv:2210.01419v1 [q-bio.NC] 4 Oct 2022
2 of 11
Many mathematical models were then proposed to explore the functional role of astrocytes
in neuronal dynamics. They include model of the “dressed neuron,” which describes the
astrocyte- mediated changes in neural excitability [
7
,
8
], model of the astrocyte serving as a
frequency selective “gate keeper” [
9
], model of the astrocyte regulating presynaptic functions
[
10
] and many others. In particular, it was demonstrated that gliotransmitters can effectively
con trol presynaptic facilitation and depression. The model of the tripartite synapse has recently
been employed to demonstrate the functions of astrocytes in the coordination of neuronal
network signaling, in particular, spike-timing-dependent plasticity and learning [
11
13
]. In
models of astrocytic networks, communication between astrocytes has been described as
Ca2+
wave propagation and synchronization of
Ca2+
waves [
14
,
15
]. However, due to a variety of
potential actions, that may be specific for brain regions and neuronal sub-types, the functional
roles of astrocytes in network dynamics are still a subject of debate.
Role of astrocytes as collaborators of spiking neuron networks (SNN) in implementing
learning and memory functions have been intensivly discussed in recent computational models
[
29
31
]. Specifically, it was demonstrated that the astrocytes serving at much slower time scale
can help SNN to distinguish highly overlapping images. Here we present another SNN model
accompanied by the astrocytes that can significantly enhance recognition of information images
encoded in the form of dynamical spiking patterns stored by the SNN.
2. The model
2.1. Mathematical model of single neuron
The SNN’s individual neuron is described by the Hodgkin-Huxley model [
16
,
17
] deter-
mined that the squid axon curries three major currents: voltage-gated persistent
K+
current,
IK
, with four activation gates (resulting in the term
n4
in the equation below, where
n
is the
activation variable for
K+
), voltage-gated transient
Na+
current,
INa
, with three activation
gates and one inactivation gate (term
m3h
below), and Ohmic leak current,
IL
, which is carried
mostly by
Cl
ions. The complete set (Eq.
(1)
) of space-clamped Hodgkin-Huxley equations is
C˙
V=Iinj
INa
z }| {
¯
gNam3h(VVNa)
IK
z }| {
¯
gKn4(VVK)
IL
z }| {
¯
gL(VVL)
˙
n=αn(V)(1n)βn(V)n
˙
m=αm(V)(1m)βm(V)m
˙
h=αh(V)(1h)βh(V)h, (1)
where:
Iinj =Istim +Inoise +Isyn (2)
αn(V) = 0.01(V+55)
1exp[(V+55)/10]
βn(V) = 1.125exp[(V+65)/80]
αm(V) = 0.1(V+40)
1exp[(V+40)/10]
βm(V) = 4exp[(V+65)/18]
αh(V) = 0.07exp[(V+65)/20]
βn(V) = 1
1+exp[(V+35)/10]
Shifted Nernst equilibrium potentials for
INa
,
IK
and
IL
are
VNa =50 mV
,
VK=77 mV
and
VL=54.4 mV
, respectively. Typical values of maximal conductances for
INa
,
IK
and
IL
3 of 11
are
¯
gNa =36 mS/cm2
,
¯
gK=120 mS/cm2
and
¯
gL=0.3 mS/cm2
, respectively. The functions
α(V)
and
β(V)
describe the transition rates between open and closed states of the channels.
C=1 ¯F/cm2
is the membrane capacitance and
Iinj
(Eq.
(2)
) is the applied current which
consists from three parts: Istim,Inoise and Isyn.
2.2. Applied currents
Images applied to the SNN were encoded as matrices
M
of size
n×k
and values from 0
to 1 for each pixel, where 0 is the absence of color, and
n
and
k
are the corresponding image
sizes (length and width). Next, the matrix
M
was transformed into an
l×
1 vector
S
, where
l=n×k
and corresponds to the neuron index in the neural network. Thus, the stimulation
current, Istim, will be written in the following form:
Istim =S×AS, (3)
where ASis the amplitude of stimulus taken here for illustration with value 5.3 nA.
The synaptic current,
Isyn
, is modeled using conductance-based approach as following
form:
Isyn =gj(VjV), (4)
where:
˙
gj=
gj
τj
(5)
In our model index
j
is used for excitatory (exc) and inhibitory (inh) synapses. Reversal
potentials for synaptic currents are equal
0 mV
and
80 mV
for excitatory and inhibitory
synapses, respectively.
τj
is the time relaxation equaled
5 ms
and
10 ms
for excitatory and
inhibitory synapses, respectively. Excitatory (inhibitory) synapses will increase the excitatory
(inhibitory) conductance in the postsynaptic cell whenever a presynaptic action potential
arrives:
gjgj+wj, (6)
where
wj
- synaptic weight equaled
3 nS
and
77 nS
for excitatory and inhibitory synapses,
respectively.
Besides the synaptic input, each neuron receives a noisy thalamic input (
Inoise
). The noisy
thalamic input is set in a random way for all neurons in the range from 0 to Anoise.
Each spike in the neuron model induces the release of neurotransmitter. To describe the
neuron to astrocyte cross-talk, here we only focus on the excitatory neurons releasing glutamate.
Following earlier experimental and modeling studies, we assumed that the glutamate-mediate
exchange was the key mechanism to induce coherent neuronal excitations [
18
,
19
]. The role of
GABAergic neurons in our network is to support the excitation and inhibition balance avoiding
hyperexcitation states.
For simplicity, we take a phenomenological model of released glutamate dynamics. In the
mean field approximation average concentration of synaptic glutamate concentration for each
excitatory synapses, Xe, was described by this equations:
Xe(t) = Xe(ts)exp(t/τX), if ts<t<ts+1,
Xe(ts0) + 1, if t=ts,(7)
摘要:

Citation:Stasenko,S.V.;KazantsevV.B.Dynamicimagerecognitioninaspikingneuronnetworksuppliedbyastrocytes.Preprints2022,1,0.https://doi.org/Publisher'sNote:MDPIstaysneutralwithregardtojurisdictionalclaimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalafl-iations.Copyright:©2022bytheauthors.SubmittedtoPreprintsforposs...

展开>> 收起<<
Dynamic image recognition in a spiking neuron network supplied by astrocytes.pdf

共11页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:11 页 大小:2.5MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-04

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 11
客服
关注