SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR NON-ZERO ENTROPY AND FINITE RELATIONS IZTOK BANI ˇC RENE GRIL ROGINA JUDY KENNEDY V AN NALL

2025-05-02 0 0 268.52KB 19 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR NON-ZERO ENTROPY AND FINITE
RELATIONS
IZTOK BANI ˇ
C, RENE GRIL ROGINA, JUDY KENNEDY, VAN NALL
Abstract. We introduce the notions of returns, dispersions and well-aligned sets for closed
relations on compact metric spaces and then we use them to obtain non-trivial sucient
conditions for such a relation to have non-zero entropy. In addition, we give a characteri-
zation of finite relations with non-zero entropy in terms of Li-Yorke and DC2-chaos.
1. Introduction
In topological dynamics, the study of chaotic behaviour of a dynamical system is often
based on some properties of continuous functions. One of the frequently studied properties
of such functions in the theory of topological dynamical systems is the entropy of a con-
tinuous function f:XXon a compact metric space X, which serves as a measure of the
complexity of the dynamical system. This often leads to studying the entropy of the shift
map σon the inverse limit lim
(X,f). More precisely, suppose Xis a compact metric space.
If f:XXis a continuous function, the inverse limit space generated by fis
lim
(X,f) :=n(x1,x2,x3,...)
Y
i=1
X|for each positive integer i,xi=f(xi+1)o,
also abbreviated as lim
f. The map fon Xinduces a natural homeomorphism σon lim
f,
called the shift map, defined by
σ(x1,x2,x3,x4,...)=(x2,x3,x4,...)
for each (x1,x2,x3,x4,...) in lim
f. It is a well-known result that the entropy of fis then
equal to the entropy of σ[7, Proposition 5.2].
To study such inverse limits lim
fand shift maps σ: lim
flim
f, the study of back-
ward orbits of points of dynamical systems (X,f) is also required; note that the inverse
limit lim
fis the space of all backward orbits in (X,f). Such backward orbits of points are
actually forward orbits of points in the dynamical system (X,f1), if f1is well-defined.
But usually, f1is not a well-defined function, therefore, a more general tool is needed to
study these properties. Note that for a continuous function f:XX, the set
Γ(f)1={(y,x)X×X|y=f(x)}
is a closed relation on Xthat describes best the dynamics of (X,f) in the backward direc-
tion when f1is not well-defined. So, generalizing topological dynamical systems (X,f)
to topological dynamical systems (X,G) with closed relations Gon Xby making the iden-
tification (X,f)=(X,Γ(f)) is only natural.
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 37B40, 37B45, 37E05; Secondary: 54C08, 54E45,
54F15, 54F17.
Key words and phrases. Entropy, closed relations, finite relations.
This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency under the research program P1-0285.
1
arXiv:2210.01880v1 [math.DS] 4 Oct 2022
2 IZTOK BANI ˇ
C, RENE GRIL ROGINA, JUDY KENNEDY, VAN NALL
Recently, many such generalizations of dynamical systems were introduced and studied
(see [4,5,8,15,17,18,19,20,22,23,25], where more references may be found). However,
there is not much known of such dynamical systems and therefore, there are many proper-
ties of such set-valued dynamical systems that are yet to be studied. In [4], the notion of
topological entropy h(f) of continuous functions f:XXon compact metric spaces X
was generalized to the notion of topological entropy ent(G) of closed relations Gon com-
pact metric spaces X. In this paper, we continue our research from [4]. We introduce the
notions of returns, dispersions and well-aligned sets for closed relations on compact metric
spaces and then use them to obtain non-trivial sucient conditions for such relations to
have non-zero entropy. In addition, we give a characterization of finite relations with non-
zero entropy. We also show that, unlike topological entropy for closed relations on compact
metric spaces in general, in the case of finite relations, positive entropy is equivalent to the
shift map on the Mahavier product being Li-Yorke chaotic as well as equivalent to DC-2
distributional chaos for the shift map, as well as equivalent to Ghaving a (k, ε)-return.
We proceed as follows. In Section 2, basic definitions and notation that are needed
later in the paper are given and presented. In Section 3, the topological entropy for closed
relations is defined and in addition, basic results from [4] are presented. In Section 4, our
first main result as well as many illustrative examples and corollaries are given and proved.
In our last section, Section 5, we restrict ourselves to finite relations on compact metric
spaces. Here, our second main result, a characterization of finite relations with non-zero
entropy, is presented and proved.
2. Definitions and notation
First, we define some properties from the continuum theory and the theory of inverse
limits that will be used later in the paper.
Definition 2.1. Let Xbe a compact metric space. We always use ρto denote the metric on
X.
Definition 2.2. Suppose Xis a compact metric space. If for each positive integer n,fn:
XXis a continuous function, the inverse limit space generated by (fn)is
lim
(X,fn) :=n(x1,x2,x3,...)
Y
i=1
X|for each positive integer i,xi=fi(xi+1)o.
Definition 2.3. A continuum is a non-empty connected compact metric space. A continuum
is degenerate, if it consists of only a single point. Otherwise it is non-degenerate.A
subcontinuum is a subspace of a continuum which itself is also a continuum.
Next, we define chainable continua (using inverse limits); see [24, Section XII] for more
details.
Definition 2.4. A continuum Xis chainable if there is a sequence ( fn) of continuous sur-
jections fn: [0,1] [0,1] such that Xis homeomorphic to lim
([0,1],fn)
n=1.
Definition 2.5. A continuum Xis decomposable, if there are proper subcontinua Aand Bof
X(A,B,X) such that X=AB. A continuum is indecomposable, if it is not decomposable.
A continuum is hereditarily indecomposable, if each of its subcontinua is indecomposable.
Definition 2.6. A pseudoarc is any non-degenerate hereditarily indecomposable chainable
continuum.
SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR NON-ZERO ENTROPY AND FINITE RELATIONS 3
Bing showed in [2] that any two pseudoarcs are homeomorphic.
Next, we present basic definitions and well-known results about closed relations and
Mahavier products.
Definition 2.7. Let Xand Ybe metric spaces, and let f:XYbe a function. We use
Γ(f)={(x,y)X×Y|y=f(x)}to denote the graph of the function f .
Definition 2.8. Let Xbe a compact metric space and let GX×Xbe a relation on X. If G
is closed in X×X, then we say that Gis a closed relation on X.
Definition 2.9. Let Xbe a set and let Gbe a relation on X. Then we define G1={(y,x)
X×X|(x,y)G}to be the inverse relation of the relation G on X.
Definition 2.10. Let Xbe a compact metric space and let Gbe a closed relation on X. Then
we call
?m
i=1G1=n(x1,x2,x3,...,xm+1)
m+1
Y
i=1
X|for each i∈ {1,2,3,...,m},(xi+1,xi)Go
for each positive integer m,the m-th Mahavier product of G1, and
?
i=1G1=n(x1,x2,x3,...)
Y
i=1
X|for each positive integer i,(xi+1,xi)Go
the infinite Mahavier product of G1.
Definition 2.11. Let Xbe a compact metric space and let Gbe a closed relation on X. The
function
σ:?
n=1G1?
n=1G1,
defined by
σ(x1,x2,x3,x4,...)=(x2,x3,x4,...)
for each (x1,x2,x3,x4,...)?
n=1G1, is called the shift map on ?
n=1G1.
3. Topological entropy of closed relations on compact metric spaces
In this section we will summarize the generalization of topological entropy to closed
relations on a compact metric space introduced in [4].
Definition 3.1. Let Xbe a compact metric space and let Sbe a family of subsets of X. We
use |S| to denote the cardinality of S.
Definition 3.2. Let Xbe a compact metric space and let Sbe a family of subsets of X. For
each positive integer n, we use Snto denote the family
Sn={S1×S2×S3×...×Sn|S1,S2,S3,...,Sn∈ S}.
We call the elements S1×S2×S3×...×Snof Sthe n-boxes (generated by the family S).
Definition 3.3. Let Xbe a compact metric space and let Ube a non-empty open cover for
X. We use N(U)to denote
N(U)=min{|V| | V is a non-empty finite subcover of U}.
Definition 3.4. Let Xbe a compact metric space, let Kbe a closed subset of the product
Qn
i=1X, and let Ube a non-empty family of open subsets of Qn
i=1Xsuch that KSU.
We use N(K,U)to denote
N(K,U)=minn|V| | V is a non-empty subfamily of Usuch that K[Vo.
4 IZTOK BANI ˇ
C, RENE GRIL ROGINA, JUDY KENNEDY, VAN NALL
Theorem 3.5. [4, Theorem 3.7] Let X be a compact metric space, let G be a closed relation
on X, and let αbe a non-empty open cover for X. Then the limit
lim
m→∞
log N(?m
i=1G1, αm+1)
m
exists.
Definition 3.6. Let Xbe a compact metric space, let Gbe a closed relation on X, and let
αbe a non-empty open cover for X. We define the entropy of G with respect to the open
cover αby
ent(G, α)=lim
m→∞
log N(?m
i=1G1, αm+1)
m.
Definition 3.7. Let Xbe a metric space and let Sand Tbe families of subsets of X. We
say that the family Srefines the family T, if for each S∈ S there is T∈ T such that ST.
The notation
T ≤ S
means that the family Srefines the family T.
Proposition 1. [4, Proposition 1] Let X be a compact metric space and let G be a closed
relation on X. For all non-empty open covers αand β,
αβ=ent(G, α)ent(G, β).
Proposition 2. [4, Proposition 2] Let X be a compact metric space and let αbe a non-empty
open cover for X. For all closed relations H and G on X,
HG=ent(H, α)ent(G, α).
Definition 3.8. Let Xbe a compact metric space, let Gbe a closed relation on X, and let
E={ent(G, α)|αis a non-empty open cover for X}.
We define the entropy of G by
ent(G)=
sup(E); G,and Eis bounded in R
;G,and Eis not bounded in R.
The following three theorems from [4] summarize what we need to know about ent(G).
Theorem 3.9. [4, Theorem 3.11] Let X be a compact metric space. For all closed relations
H and G on X,
HG=ent(H)ent(G).
Theorem 3.10. [4, Theorem 3.12] Let X be a compact metric space and let G be a closed
relation on X. Then
ent(G1)=ent(G).
In [4] it is shown that the entropy of closed relations on Xis a generalization of the well-
known topological entropy of continuous functions f:XX. For a continuous function
f:XXon the compact metric space Xthe entropy of fis usually denoted h(f). To suit
the purposes of this paper it is enough to note that it is shown in [4, Theorem 3.19] that
h(f)=ent(Γ(f)). For more information on h(f) see [4] and [27]. Finally, we need Theorem
3.12, also from [4], where the following notation is used.
摘要:

SUFFICIENTCONDITIONSFORNON-ZEROENTROPYANDFINITERELATIONSIZTOKBANIC,RENEGRILROGINA,JUDYKENNEDY,VANNALLAbstract.Weintroducethenotionsofreturns,dispersionsandwell-alignedsetsforclosedrelationsoncompactmetricspacesandthenweusethemtoobtainnon-trivialsucientconditionsforsucharelationtohavenon-zeroentrop...

展开>> 收起<<
SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR NON-ZERO ENTROPY AND FINITE RELATIONS IZTOK BANI ˇC RENE GRIL ROGINA JUDY KENNEDY V AN NALL.pdf

共19页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:19 页 大小:268.52KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 19
客服
关注