Propagation Stability Concepts for Network Synchronization Processes Sandip Roy Subir Sarker and Mengran Xue Abstract A notion of disturbance propagation stability is

2025-05-02 0 0 836.98KB 7 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Propagation Stability Concepts for Network Synchronization Processes
Sandip Roy, Subir Sarker, and Mengran Xue
Abstract A notion of disturbance propagation stability is
defined for dynamical network processes, in terms of decres-
cence of an input-output energy metric along cutsets away from
the disturbance source. A characterization of the disturbance
propagation notion is developed for a canonical model for
synchronization of linearly-coupled homogeneous subsystems.
Specifically, propagation stability is equivalenced with the
frequency response of a certain local closed-loop model, which
is defined from the subsystem model and local network connec-
tions, being sub-unity gain. For the case where the subsystem
is single-input single-output (SISO), a further simplification in
terms of the subsystem’s open loop Nyquist plot is obtained.
An extension of the disturbance propagation stability concept
toward imperviousness of subnetworks to disturbances is briefly
developed, and an example focused on networks with planar
subsystems is considered.
I. INTRODUCTION
The synchronization of coupled systems is common in
nature and in the engineered world. For this reason, there has
been a substantial cross-disciplinary research effort to define
and characterize synchronization phenomena in networks
of coupled systems [1]–[3]. These studies define synchro-
nization in terms of the internal asymptotic stability of a
manifold, on which each coupled system has an identical
state or output. However, synchronization in a practical sense
requires not only that the coupled systems come to a common
state/output, but also that this equilibrium is impervious to
external disturbances. Based on this recognition, a body of
recent work has considered the disturbance responses of
network synchronization processes [4]–[6]. Broadly, these
efforts model disturbances as impinging on all or a subset
of subsystems within a network, and evaluate their potential
impacts on network-wide synchrony according to a perfor-
mance metric (typically, a H2or Hgain). The studies in
this direction have largely focused on evaluating the metrics
from a graph-theoretic perspective, and designing controllers
to bound the performance metrics within a threshold.
Engineers working with large-scale built networks often
do not think about coordination in terms of either internal
stability characteristics or global (network-wide) disturbance
response metrics. Rather, they are concerned with the extent
of propagation of local disturbances, whether arising from
exogenous inputs or state deviations. For instance, bulk
power grid operators often distinguish well-damped networks
where oscillatory disturbance responses remain localized
from poorly-damped ones where such disturbances have
network-wide impact [7]. Similar assessments of network
The first two authors are with School of Electrical Engineering and Com-
puter Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. The
third author is with Raytheon BBN Technologies. Correspondence:
sandip@wsu.edu
performance in terms of disturbance propagation are of
interest in disciplines ranging from air traffic management
to infectious-disease epidemiology and cyber-security [8].
The spatial propagation of disturbances among intercon-
nected systems in cascade or line-topology configurations
has been extensively researched under the heading of string
stability [9], [10]. The string stability concept has also been
extended to general directional networks in the mesh stability
literature [11]. The recent study [12] has recognized the need
for disturbance-propagation stability notions for general (bi-
directionally connected) dynamical networks, and therefore
has proposed a definition for network stability in terms
of boundedness of input-to-state or input-to-output gains
which parallels the basic string stability definition. It has
also introduced an alternate network stability definition for
tree-like graphs which captures monotonic decresence of the
propagative response away from the disturbance source; this
definition is a generalization of the strict string stability con-
cept [10]. Other recent studies have also examined stability
notions for linear and nonlinear network processes, which are
concerned with disturbance propagation (e.g., [13]). Addi-
tionally, a number of recent studies have characterized local-
input-to-output properties of dynamical networks (e.g., gains,
zeros), without however explicitly considering propagation
[14], [15]. However, definitions for propagation stability are
not yet mature, and the formal analysis of propagation is
incomplete even for networks of coupled linear systems.
The purpose of this article is to define and characterize a
notion of disturbance propagation stability in the context of
a canonical network model for synchronization of coupled
homogeneous linear subsystems. The main contributions of
the study are two-fold:
1) A general definition is introduced for (strict) propaga-
tion stability, based on decrescence of response norms across
cutsets in the network’s digraph, or equivalently along paths
away from the disturbance source.
2) Propagation stability is characterized in terms of the
closed-loop frequency responses of the subsystem model
with a proportional feedback controller applied. For the case
of single-input single-output subsystems, these conditions are
further simplified to conditions on the subsystem’s open-loop
frequency response and/or transfer function.
The analysis of propagation stability depends on a new,
local characterization of synchronization models. This char-
acterization is markedly different from the spectral decom-
position that has been exhaustively used to understand both
internal and global external stability [1], [2], and provides
a further assessment/categorization of synchronization pro-
cesses.
arXiv:2210.04370v1 [eess.SY] 9 Oct 2022
The remainder of the article is organized as follows. The
network synchronization model is described in Section II,
and disturbance propagation stability notions are defined
in Section III. The main characterizations of propagation
stability are presented in Section IV. Finally, in Section V, an
example is given which focuses on the impact of damping on
propagation stability when the subsytems are planar devices.
II. MODEL
A network with Nidentical, interconnected devices or
nodes or subsystems, labeled 1, . . . , N, is considered. Each
subsystem i1, . . . , N has a state xiRnand output
yiRmwhich are governed by the following linear or
linearized state-space equations:
˙
xi=Axi+B
αX
j6=i
gij (yjyi) + γiwi
(1)
yi=Cxi.
Here, A,B, and Care a subsystem’s state, input, and output
matrices, respectively; the scalars gij 0are coupling
weights; the vector wiRmrepresents an external dis-
turbance input at subsystem i; and αis a global coupling-
strength parameter which allows tuning of the network
connectivity (see [1]). Our focus here is on an external
disturbance impinging on a single source node s1, . . . , N,
which is modeled by setting γs= 1 and γi= 0 for i6=s.
The model (1) is a standard representation for the small-
signal dynamics of synchronizing coupled oscillators [1],
[2], with two distinctions. First, a disturbance is applied
at a single subsystem, to allow for analysis of propagative
impacts. Second, the subsystems are modeled as being inter-
connected through commensurately-dimensioned inputs and
outputs, rather than through an explicit inner-coupling term
or alternately through a designable protocol. This format
is used to stress that the network is made up of input-
output devices with fixed connections, but the formulation
encompasses the scenarios with an inner coupling or a
designable protocol.
Analyses of (1) often are phrased in terms of a graph
that represents the network interconnections. For our devel-
opment, a weighted digraph Γis defined with Nvertices
corresponding to the Nsubsystems. A directed edge is
drawn from vertex jto vertex iif gij >0, reflecting a
direct influence of the output of subsystem jon the state
evolution of subsystem i. The edge is assigned a weight of
gij . We use the notation Vfor the set of vertices, and Efor
the set of edges. Additionally, it is convenient to define an
(asymmetric) Laplacian matrix L= [lij ]RN×N. Each off-
diagonal entry lij is given by gij , while the diagonal entries
are selected so that each row sums to 0(i.e. lii =Pj6=igij ).
For the model (1), the synchronization manifold where the
states x1,...,xnare identical is known to be asympotically
stable under broad conditions on the network graph, the
subsystem model, and the coupling-strength parameter. More
precisely, stability can be related to Hurwitz stability of the
Ncomplex matrices A+λiBC, where 0 = λ1, λ2, . . . , λN
are the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix L. From this anal-
ysis, stability can be distilled to a simple test on the Laplacian
matrix’s spectrum via the master stability function construct,
see e.g. [1] for details. A number of other characteristics of
(1), including global disturbance stability and controllability
via external stimulation, can also be related to the matrices
A+λiBC [4], [16].
From here on we refer to the model (1) as the network
synchronization model. The model is approximative of a
number of synchronization phenomena, including the swing
dynamics of the bulk power grid, multi-vehicle formation
flight, and the nonlinear dynamics of electrical oscillator
networks.
III. PROPAGATION STABILITY DEFINITION
A notion of propagation stability is defined based on the
spatial patterns of output energies (squared two norms) at
network subsystems over a time interval [0, T ], when an
exogenous disturbance input ws(t)is applied at a single
node. In our development, the disturbance is assumed to sat-
isfy the Dirichlet conditions (absolute integrability over any
period, finite number of discontinuities and minima/maxima,
bounded over any interval), but otherwise may be arbi-
trary. In defining stability, the squared two-norm metric
Ei(T) = RT
t=0 yT
i(t)yi(t)dt is considered for each network
subsystem i. Conceptually, the network can be viewed as
propagation stable, if these energies are attenuated away from
the disturbance source with respect to the network graph.
However, since the network’s graph in general has a spatially
inhomogeneous structure, defining attenuation requires some
care.
Fig. 1. Illustration of the propagation stability concept.
One natural way to assess disturbance propagation is
to consider the energy metric Ei(T)for vertex-cutsets in
the network’s graph (i.e., sets of vertices whose removal
partition the graph). If the metric value for at least one cutset
vertex is larger than the metric values for vertices that are
separated from the source by the cutset, then the response
can be viewed as being attenuated away from the source
(see Figure 1). To formalize this notion, let us consider a
set of vertices VC∈ V. We refer to VCas a separating
cutset for the source s, if the remaining vertices V \ VC
can be partitioned into two subsets V1and VBsuch that: 1)
there are no edges from vertices in V1to vertices in VBand
摘要:

PropagationStabilityConceptsforNetworkSynchronizationProcessesSandipRoy,SubirSarker,andMengranXueAbstract—Anotionofdisturbancepropagationstabilityisdenedfordynamicalnetworkprocesses,intermsofdecres-cenceofaninput-outputenergymetricalongcutsetsawayfromthedisturbancesource.Acharacterizationofthedistu...

展开>> 收起<<
Propagation Stability Concepts for Network Synchronization Processes Sandip Roy Subir Sarker and Mengran Xue Abstract A notion of disturbance propagation stability is.pdf

共7页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:7 页 大小:836.98KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 7
客服
关注