PHYSICS TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARITY WITH A.V. USOVA REVISITED O. Yavoruk

2025-05-02 0 0 127.46KB 8 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
PHYSICS TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARITY
WITH A.V. USOVA REVISITED
O. Yavoruk
Independent Scholar (RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
Abstract
The paper deals with pedagogical heritage of A.V. Usova (1921-2014) that yields insights into problems
of interdisciplinary relationship in the school science education system. Her fundamental works were
used as teaching guides in the preparation of physics teachers of all pedagogical universities of the
Soviet Union and Russia. In this study, professor Usova is not an interdisciplinary researcher; she is a
researcher of interdisciplinarity. Here is provided a short and consistent description of her views on
teaching physics as a foundation of educational interdisciplinarity. Usova elaborated educational
functions, classifications, organizational levels, ways of instantiating, content-related foundations of
interdisciplinary relations, recommendations for practical applying interdisciplinary relations. Besides,
Usova suggested a unified approach to the study of knowledge and skills through the generalized plans.
And we would like not simply clarify, retell or restate the very powerful didactic discoveries of Usova, but
consider opportunities of teaching across boundaries for actual educational challenges. The future of
the field of didactics, which deals with the study of interdisciplinarity, is very interesting and attractive.
This problem will always excite scientists, educators and teachers, and the futurity of science education
depends on the ways it is solved.
Keywords: Physics Teaching, Interdisciplinarity, Interdisciplinary Teaching, History of Education.
1 INTRODUCTION
2021 marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of an outstanding Soviet and Russian scientist and
pedagogue Antonina Vasilyevna Usova. Any round-number anniversary encourages deep rethinking
the previous experiences, current problems and views on the future. Understanding of happened events
and accomplished transformations comes after some time, and the feeling of being late always does not
leave us (everything is done with delay). We want to understand what is completely out of date, what
has significantly changed, and what is still essential and relevant.
A.V. Usova is the most important educational theorist in physics teaching of Russian education. She
made crucial contributions to the different fields of pedagogical science: general and specific issues of
physics teaching at schools and universities, concept learning in physics classes, increasing of interest
in the study of physics, organization of students’ self-learning, formation of general learning skills,
teaching students to solving physics problems, methodology of pedagogical experiment (elemental and
operational analysis), issues of polytechnic education, theory and practice of developing education,
educational interdisciplinarity.
A.V. Usova called herself a teacher, a scientist, and a didactician (Didactics is “the activities of educating
or instructing; activities that impart knowledge or skill” [1] and “the art or science of teaching” [2]). In the
history of pedagogical sciences, she remained as the author of many fundamental didactic ideas.
Attempts to comprehend Usova’s contribution into pedagogical sciences were undertaken by many
researchers [3], [4], [5]. Her pedagogical views were discussed at scientific conferences [6].
A.V. Usova published her books and articles in Russian only, and this fact complicates our review, since
a simple transfer of pedagogical traditions, terminology and approaches of Soviet and Russian education
is impossible. Some educational terms cannot be rendered with complete accuracy from one linguistic
system to another. We detect certain translation difficulties with terms that concern practical physics
teaching. They ("metodika", "medodicheskiye", "metodika prepodavaniya fiziki", "obobshchyonnye plany")
do not have accurate English equivalents. Some of her books have been translated into Spanish [7] and
Bulgarian [8].
Different languages and different cultures often don't have comparable terms. There are small but
important differences in using these terms. Teachers and educators still argue about these definitions. We
are going to use the term “interdisciplinary relations” since it is closest to the ideas of Usova. Of course,
relations concern different kinds of connecting, integrating and unifying several scientific disciplines.
Proceedings of INTED2022 Conference
7th-8th March 2022
ISBN: 978-84-09-37758-9
0067
Word-by-word translation will not achieve the desired goals for many reasons. Nowadays, a lot of things
may seem naive and outdated. Eventually, our world is open, and the interested researcher can personally
read the primary sources anyway. My retellings of Usova’s contribution to the field of educational
interdisciplinarity are based not only on texts, but also on personal conversations with Usova.
2 INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING BY USOVA
Usova's achievements in the study of interdisciplinarity can be used in the process of teaching different
scientific disciplines [9]. Her brochure “Interdisciplinary relationship in school science teaching” was
reprinted several times [10]. The book on the methods of teaching physics, also published many times,
necessarily included a chapter on interdisciplinary relations [11].
A.V.Usova regularly published thematic collections of articles [12], [13], [14] and organized topical
conferences [15]. The interdisciplinary relationship was a crucial factor in Usova's original Conception
of Natural Science Education [16], [17], [18]. And we should note the interest of A.V. Usova to the history
of physics [19].
The problems of interdisciplinary didactics were regularly discussed on the conference series
"Methodology of the scientific concepts formation among school and university students". Mastermind
of these conferences was A.V. Usova. She organized them annually (Chelyabinsk, South Urals, Soviet
Union and Russia, 1971-2013) [20].
Year after year Usova developed and improved her ideas, clarifying formulations, perfecting statements,
refining phrases, taking into account emerging circumstances. Her apprentices have developed various
aspects of interdisciplinary teaching (integrated disciplines, multidisciplinary classes, complex seminars,
integrative lessons, interdisciplinary lectures, practical works, labs, exercises, etc.) with detailed
descriptions, step-by-step instructions and guides [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31].
Interdisciplinary activity is often accused of dilettantism and “shoddy standards” [32]. These statements
do not sound particularly surprising, and sometimes we see the resistance to interdisciplinary ideas in
the scholar discussions. Academic disciplines are self-contained. Without trying interrelations they will
always be receding from each other. That lets us take for granted that what we consider to be our way
of disciplinary teaching is actually reliable. Interdisciplinarity is a particular way of teaching that is still far
from clear. We understand disciplinary knowledge fairly well, what can we lose or gain due to removing
interdisciplinarity? It is hard but we cannot say that it is definitely impossible.
Usova understood clearly the importance of school physics teaching and was a strong supporter of the
disciplinary structure of natural science teaching. She came up with a wonderful definition of what
interdisciplinary relations are. In her educational conception interdisciplinary relations was a didactic
condition for disciplinary teaching, the quality of students' knowledge improving, development of
thinking, worldview forming, technical preparing, and professional orientation. It is a remedy to the
harmful effects of educational disciplinary specialization.
It is easy to understand what Usova had in mind. Physics and some disciplines have a longstanding
relationship. Their relation may be characterized as a sort of friendly rivalry. These are astronomy,
biology, chemistry, mathematics, history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, etc. They have different
aims, methods and results, but their subjects often overlap. And it is ultimately interesting to view the
same object from different points of view, comparing the results. Sometimes it's funny and weird, but
results are always enlightening. So how can the system ever adequately get going? The answer is only
due actuating relations between separate components (disciplines).
Moreover, she encourages to the earlier study of school physics, and this propaedeutic (introductory)
physics course has many passionate proponents [33]. Physics can serve as a pillar in clarifying
interdisciplinary relationships by virtue of its fundamentality. Physics is viewed as the core and origin of
natural science education.
In a system of education in which there were no regular relations, there would be no good knowledge
and confidence in its usefulness. But what do interrelations really mean, and where does it come from?
From an epistemological point of view, interdisciplinary relations are a reflection of relations between
sciences. Science has a disciplinary structure, but complex problems solving often requires
understanding of different disciplines. Besides we often deal with complex subjects that should be
examined by multiple scientific fields.
0068
摘要:

PHYSICSTEACHINGANDEDUCATIONALINTERDISCIPLINARITYWITHA.V.USOVAREVISITEDO.YavorukIndependentScholar(RUSSIANFEDERATION)AbstractThepaperdealswithpedagogicalheritageofA.V.Usova(1921-2014)thatyieldsinsightsintoproblemsofinterdisciplinaryrelationshipintheschoolscienceeducationsystem.Herfundamentalworkswere...

展开>> 收起<<
PHYSICS TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARITY WITH A.V. USOVA REVISITED O. Yavoruk.pdf

共8页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:8 页 大小:127.46KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 8
客服
关注