Constraining Anisotropic Cosmological Model in fRLmGravity N. S. Kavya 1V . Venkatesha 1 Sanjay Mandal 2 and P .K. Sahoo2 1Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Mathematics

2025-05-02 0 0 528.58KB 11 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Constraining Anisotropic Cosmological Model in f(R,Lm)Gravity
N. S. Kavya ,1, V. Venkatesha ,1, Sanjay Mandal ,2, and P.K. Sahoo 2, §
1Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Mathematics,
Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shivamogga 577451, Karnataka, INDIA
2Department of Mathematics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science-Pilani,
Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad 500078, INDIA
(Dated: October 19, 2022)
The observational evidence regarding the present cosmological aspects tells us about the presence
of very little anisotropy in the universe on a large scale. Here, in this paper, we attempt to study
locally rotationally symmetric (LRS) homogeneous Bianchi-I spacetime with the isotropic matter dis-
tribution. This is done within the framework of f(R,Lm)gravity. Particularly, we consider a non-
linear f(R,Lm)model, f(R,Lm) = 1
2R+Lα
m. Furthermore, ω, the equation of state parameter,
which is vital stuff in determining the present phase of the universe is constrained. To constrain the
model parameters and the equation of state parameter, we use 57 Hubble data points and 1048 Pan-
theon supernovae type Ia data sample. And, for our statistical analysis, we use Markoc Chain Monte
Carlo (MCMC) simulation. Moreover, with the help of obtained values of parameters, we measure
the anisotropy parameter for our model.
Keywords: Equation of state parameter, f(R,Lm)gravity, observational constraints, anisotropy
parameter.
I. INTRODUCTION
Over the past few decades, many scientific explo-
rations have been taking place to decipher the mys-
tic behavior of the universe. Right from the early
time inflation to the late time acceleration, from the
black holes to the wormholes, from the dark energy to
the gravitational waves, their entire course has been
probing the very nature of the universe. Just to look
into the cosmological principle, the universe on a large
scale, was presumed to be both isotropic and homo-
geneous. But in 1992, Cosmic Background Explorer
(COBE) successfully made a significant assertion about
the existence of a small anisotropy in the large-scale
cosmic microwave background [1]. Moreover, in the
later years, this was further supported by the measure-
ments made by Balloon Observations of Millimetric Ex-
tragalactic Radiation and Geophysics (BOOMERanG)
[2], Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) [3], Wilkinson Mi-
crowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)[4], and the Plank
collaborations[5]. Furthermore, intriguing advance-
ments in the field of cosmology took place through the
observational results of the two teams led by Perlmutter
and Riess [6,7]. These studies strive to endorse that the
universe is currently in the phase of accelerated expan-
kavya.samak.10@gmail.com
vensmath@gmail.com
sanjaymandal960@gmail.com
§pksahoo@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in
sion. To this point, there arose a question regarding the
isotropic nature of the expansion of the universe. Inter-
estingly, recent developments suggest that the universe
tends to expand at a different rate in different directions
[8]. Though FLRW cosmology is most successful, it is
built based on cosmological principles. However, the
observational evidence attempts to elucidate the pres-
ence of a slight difference in the strengths of microwaves
coming from different axes. For this reason, the space-
time that can appropriately describe anisotropic and
homogeneous geometry is Bianchi cosmology. Several
works on such Bianchi cosmology with different modi-
fied gravity frameworks can be found in the literature.
(See ref [920])
In the present scenario, to deal with the study of such
aspects, the modified theoretic approach sounds more
potent. Among these, the f(R)theory of gravity has
produced a reliable framework for evaluating the cur-
rent cosmic evolution [21]. Indeed, f(R)theories can
adequately explain the interpretations of late-time accel-
eration [20,22], the exclusion of the dark matter entity
in the analysis of the dynamics of massive test parti-
cles [23], and the unification of inflation with dark en-
ergy [24]. Furthermore, numerous justifications indicate
that the higher-order theories, like f(R)gravity, are ca-
pable of explaining the flatness of galaxies’ rotational
curves [25]. With these motivations, several coupling
theories came into existence [2628]. One such theory
is the f(R,Lm)theory of gravity [29]. Notably, this fa-
vors the occurrence of an extra force that is orthogonal to
arXiv:2210.09307v1 [gr-qc] 17 Oct 2022
2
four-velocity. In addition, the so-called ‘extra’ force ac-
counts for the non-geodesic motions of the test particle.
Consequently, a violation of the equivalence principle
can be observed. Numerous contributions to this theory
can be seen in the literature [3038]. Recently, Jaybhaye
et al have studied cosmology in f(R,Lm)gravity [39].
In the present work, we center on the study of the-
oretical exploration and observational validation of the
LRS Bianchi type I spacetime and effectuate this in terms
of f(R,Lm)formalism. Moreover, in assessing the ex-
panding universe the equation of state parameter plays
a prominent role. This predicts the fluid type in space-
time. In our work, we emphasize constraining this cos-
mological parameter ωand obtaining the best fit values
as per the observational measurements. This is accom-
plished with a statistical approach for incorporated sets
of data samples. We use two types of data samples such
as Hubble measurements and Pantheon SNe Ia sample
. Further, with the anisotropy parameter, we measure
anisotropy in spacetime.
This manuscript is organized as follows: in section II,
the basic formulation of f(R,Lm)gravity is presented.
The analysis of LRS Bianchi I within the framework of
the f(R,Lm)gravity is made in section III. Section IV
is brought with the examination of observational con-
straints and discussion of results. Finally, the last section
V, gives some concluding remarks.
II. THE BASIC FIELD EQUATIONS IN f(R,Lm)
GRAVITY
With the matter lagrangian density Lmand the Ricci
scalar R, the action integral for f(R,Lm)theory reads,
S=Zf(R,Lm)pg d4x, (1)
where frepresents an arbitrary function of Rand Lm.
The field equation for the f(R,Lm)gravity [29], ob-
tained by varying the action integral (1) with respect to
the metric tensor gµν is given by,
fR(R,Lm)Rµν + (gµνµµ µν)fR(R,Lm)
1
2f(R,Lm)fLm(R,Lm)Lmgµν =
1
2fLm(R,Lm)Tµν.
(2)
Here, fR(R,Lm)f(R,Lm)
R,fLm(R,Lm)f(R,Lm)
Lm,
and Tµν is the Energy-Momentum Tensor (EMT) that
can be expressed as,
Tµν =2
g
δ(gLm)
δgµν =gµνLm2Lm
gµν . (3)
Now, from the explicit form of the field equation (2),
the covariant divergence of EMT Tµν can be obtained as,
µTµν =2nµln fLm(R,Lm)oLm
gµν . (4)
Furthermore, on contracting the field equation (2) we
get,
3µµfR(R,Lm) + fR(R,Lm)R − 2f(R,Lm)
fLm(R,Lm)Lm=1
2fLm(R,Lm)T.(5)
By considering the above equation, the relation be-
tween the trace of EMT T=Tµ
µ,Lmand Rcan be es-
tablished.
III. LRS BIANCHI-I COSMOLOGY IN f(R,Lm)
GRAVITY
For anisotropic and spacially homogeneous LRS
Bianchi-I spacetime, the metric is described by,
ds2=dt2+A2(t)dx2+B2(t)dy2+B2(t)dz2, (6)
where, Aand Bare metric potentials that are the func-
tions of (cosmic) time talone. If A(t) = B(t) = a(t),
then one can analyze the scenarios in flat FLRW space-
time. Now, the Ricci scalar for LRS Bianchi-I spacetime
can be expressed as,
R=2"¨
A
A+2¨
B
B+2˙
A˙
B
AB +˙
B2
B2#(7)
With the directional Hubble parameters Hx,Hyand
Hz, the Ricci scalar for the corresponding metric is given
by,
R=2(˙
Hx+2˙
Hy) + 2(H2
x+3H2
y) + 4HxHy. (8)
Here, Hx=˙
A
Aand Hy=˙
B
B=Hzindicate the direc-
tional Hubble parameters along the corresponding co-
ordinate axes. For Hx=Hy=H, i.e., for FLRW cosmol-
ogy, the equation R=2(˙
Hx+2˙
Hy) + 2(H2
x+3H2
y) +
4HxHyreduces to R=6(2H2+˙
H). In the present work,
we are supposing the matter distribution to be described
3
by the energy-momentum tensor of a perfect fluid,
Tµν = (ρ+p)UµUν+p gµν, (9)
where ρis the energy density and pis the pressure. The
four-velocity, Uµsatisfies the condition UµUµ=1 and
UµUµ;ν=0. Thus, the field equation (2) takes the form,
˙
fR(Hx+2Hy) + ( ˙
Hx(t) + 2˙
Hy+H2
x+2H2
y)fR
1
2ffLmLm=ρfLm
2,
(10)
¨
fR2Hy˙
fR+ ( ˙
Hx+H2
x+2HxHy)fR
1
2ffLmLm=pfLm
2,(11)
¨
fR2Hx˙
fR+ ( ˙
Hy+2HxHy)fR
1
2ffLmLm=pfLm
2.(12)
The dot (·)here represents the derivative with respect
to the time tand ff(R,Lm).
Further, one can express the spatial volume Vof the
spacetime as,
V=a3=AB2. (13)
Thus the mean value of the Hubble parameter is given
by,
H=˙
a
a=1
3(Hx+2Hy). (14)
In further study, we are going to investigate the physical
cosmological model and their application in the context
of f(R,Lm)gravity using the above set of equations.
A. Physical Model:
In the present study, we shall focus on the cosmo-
logical aspects of f(R,Lm)theory, with the relation be-
tween Rand Lmbeing
f(R,Lm) = 1
2R+Lα
m, (15)
where, α6=0 is a model parameter and one can retain
GR for α=1.
Now, to find an exact solution to the field equations
(10)-(12), we have to consider the constraining relation.
To this point, we shall presume the anisotropic relation
that can be written in terms of shear (σ)and expansion
scalar (θ)as,
θ2σ2,
so that, for constant σ
θ, the Hubble expansion can
achieve isotropy [42,43]. This condition gives rise to
A(t) = B(t)n, (16)
for some real non-zero n, and for n=1, we can retrieve
flat FLRW cosmology. With this, one can get the relation
between directional Hubble parameters as,
Hx=nHy. (17)
Therefore, averaged Hubble parameter can takes the
form,
H=n+2
3Hy. (18)
Additionally, we shall relate the the pressure pand en-
ergy density ρby,
p=ωρ. (19)
Now, we have two choices for the Lagrangian to pro-
ceed further such as Lm=ρor Lm=p[40]. But, in
our study we consider Lm=ρbecause it is the most
adequate choice presented in [40]. In literature, these
are many studies which have been explored the choices
for Lmand their applications [to see more details please
check the references therein [40,41].
Applying the above conditions, the field equations
(10)-(12) become,
9(2n+1)
(n+2)2H2=(ρ)α, (20)
6˙
H
(n+2)+27H2
(n+2)2=(ρ)αα(1+ω) + 1,
(21)
3˙
Hn+1
n+2+9H2n2+3
(n+2)2=(ρ)αα(1+ω) + 1.
(22)
With the help of aforementioned equations we can ob-
tain an expression for the Hubble parameter Hin terms
of redshift zas,
H(z) = γ1(z+1)γ1/γ2, (23)
where, γ1=2(n+2)and γ2=3[α(ω+1)(2n+1) +
2(n1)]. Here, we used the scale factor a(t)and red-
摘要:

ConstrainingAnisotropicCosmologicalModelinf(R,Lm)GravityN.S.Kavya,1,V.Venkatesha,1,†SanjayMandal,2,‡andP.K.Sahoo2,§1DepartmentofP.G.StudiesandResearchinMathematics,KuvempuUniversity,Shankaraghatta,Shivamogga577451,Karnataka,INDIA2DepartmentofMathematics,BirlaInstituteofTechnologyandScience-Pilani,H...

展开>> 收起<<
Constraining Anisotropic Cosmological Model in fRLmGravity N. S. Kavya 1V . Venkatesha 1 Sanjay Mandal 2 and P .K. Sahoo2 1Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Mathematics.pdf

共11页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:11 页 大小:528.58KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 11
客服
关注