
Relationships between patenting trends and research activity for green energy technologies A PREPRINT
part of the researchers believes that ESG ratings are ineffective, since it is not possible to evaluate the true value
of criteria, but it is possible to fulfill all the conditions and requirements of the ratings without additional efforts
([9, 10, 11]). This trend is observed due to the fact that the mechanism of the relationship between ESG ratings and
green innovations has not been studied in detail, therefore, the results do not act as a universal criterion for evaluating
green technologies ([12]). Existing research is also limited and, in most cases, based on developed countries with
relatively mature ESG systems, as developing countries are not well established on the market and are still in the
early stages of creating an ESG system ([13]). Although ESG ratings have a significant impact on ecoinnovation in
the field of green technologies, these energy-efficient and resource-efficient processes play a predominant role in the
development of the industrial sector.
Interestingly, in recent years, the existence of an industrial paradox can be observed with the growing demand for
renewable energy technologies (RES). Apparently, the ESG agenda in part of the letter E catalyzes interest in carbon-
neutral energy, and RES is the brightest representative of this energy. In other words, the ESG agenda creates additional
demand for renewable energy, catalyzes this market, and promotes more investment. However, the production of
renewable energy will require the more forced extraction of rare-earth metals, such as nickel and lithium. In addition
to other metals often used in the production of electric batteries, they are by far the main capacity for RES-generated
electricity. Consequently, increasing the rate of extraction of target metals for RES will increase emissions, increasing
the anthropogenic impact on the environment. Despite the initial good intentions to improve the environmental
situation ([14]).
Over the past decades, the industrial sector has faced two main constraints: the waste of natural resources and the
rapidly growing pollution of the environment ([15]). Therefore, ecoinnovations have become an important measure
to solve the problems of developing industries that negatively affect the state of the biosphere. Consequently,
production is indispensable in the concept of sustainable development, whose vector aims at the development of
new environmentally friendly technologies. One such example is the use of environmentally friendly chemicals from
renewable raw materials that contribute to the sustainability of the chemical sector. However, these “green” chemical
technologies can only contribute to a more sustainable society if their environmental impact is lower than that of their
traditional counterparts ([16]).
For the development of the industrial technology sector, new ideas, methods for implementing, developing and testing
prototypes of resource- and energy-efficient green technologies in smaller laboratory conditions using experimental
facilities are needed. To implement this research trajectory, research and development (R&D) is widely used around
the world.
Sponsoring R&D acts as a contribution to innovation. According to the R&D specifics, not all the results of this
work correspond to technological advances, which are usually perceived as the result of innovative activity. Some
countries, such as China, allocate government subsidies to stimulate the introduction of R&D in the field of green
technologies, which does not always contribute to their development and subsequent implementation on a large scale
([17]). It is worth noting that in recent years there have been a growing number of studies, the object of which is
the quantitative indicator of patent activity in the field of environmental innovations in green technologies. Patents
are considered the result of research experimental activity; however, not all patents can have practical application in
production. Therefore, researchers try to measure technological progress based on the production structure ([18]).
Despite numerous theoretical studies showing a direct proportional relationship between the number of innovative
ecotechnologies and the improvement of the climate situation, there is weak empirical evidence to confirm this ([5]).
The ambiguity of the impact of eco-innovations in the field of green technologies on reducing the carbon footprint was
also noted. This was expressed in the presence of both positive and negative dynamics of the impact of eco-innovations
on CO2emissions, depending on the conditions. The varied impact can be observed due to several factors: the level of
income of the country and the time interval ([19]), which allows us to conclude that the contribution of ecoinnovations
to sustainable development is ambiguous.
The field of green technology affects all areas of human activity ([18, 20, 21]). Some of the most promising tracks,
namely renewable energy technology, decarbonization, and hydrogen energy, were chosen for the study in this article
([22, 23, 24]). It is these tracks contribute to the dynamic development of the economy and science in general.
Furthermore, selected areas are actively supported by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) ([25]). These are
’Affordable and Clean Energy’ (SDG number 7) ([26]), ’Industry, ’Innovation and Infrastructure’ (number 9) ([27]),
’Responsible Consumption and Production’ (number 12) ([28, 29]), and ’Climate Action’ (number 13) ([19]).
In recent times, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been introduced in many spheres of people’s life. Such wide application
is entailed with intensive training of machine learning models and, as a consequence, with significant energy
consumption. Hence, there is a serious concern about direct connection between AI computing and considerable CO2
emissions. A special tracker [30] can be leveraged to track carbon emissions resulting from the training procedure.
2