RELA_2025_1_Formenti_et_al_Ageing_and_complexity

2025-04-14 0 0 762.68KB 23 页 5.8玖币
侵权投诉
Formenti, Laura; Cino, Davide; Loberto, Francesca
Ageing and complexity. Reframing older adults' learning through
interdisciplinary lenses
European journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 16 (2025) 1, S. 75-96
Quellenangabe/ Reference:
Formenti, Laura; Cino, Davide; Loberto, Francesca: Ageing and complexity. Reframing older adults'
learning through interdisciplinary lenses - In: European journal for Research on the Education and
Learning of Adults 16 (2025) 1, S. 75-96 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-327370 - DOI:
10.25656/01:32737; 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.5193
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-327370
https://doi.org/10.25656/01:32737
in Kooperation mit / in cooperation with:
http://www.ep.liu.se
Nutzungsbedingungen Terms of use
Dieses Dokument steht unter folgender Creative Commons-Lizenz:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de - Sie dürfen das Werk
bzw. den Inhalt vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen
sowie Abwandlungen und Bearbeitungen des Werkes bzw. Inhaltes
anfertigen, solange Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm
festgelegten Weise nennen.
This document is published under following Creative Commons-License:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en - You may copy, distribute
and render this document accessible, make adaptations of this work or its
contents accessible to the public as long as you attribute the work in the
manner specified by the author or licensor.
Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die
Nutzungsbedingungen an.
By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated conditions of
use.
Kontakt / Contact:
peDOCS
DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation
Informationszentrum (IZ) Bildung
E-Mail: pedocs@dipf.de
Internet: www.pedocs.de
University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy (laura.formenti@unimib.it)
University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy (davide.cino@unimib.it)
University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy (f.loberto@campus.unimib.it)
This paper presents a critical literature review on the systemic interconnections between
ageing, learning, and care. Using the lenses of complexity and interdisciplinarity, we
analysed a sample of 62 papers published between 2003 and 2022, examining their
reference to micro, meso and/or macro levels, theoretical depth, and use of complexity as
a sensitizing concept to understand implications for learning and transformation as
structural features of an ageing society. Our analysis highlighted the role of different
settings of care (formal, informal, and technology-mediated) in shaping, enhancing, or
hindering meaning, well-being, and social justice for older learners and their caregivers,
and the implications for society at large. Findings suggest a gap in the examined
literature regarding the use of complexity theories to highlight self-organisation,
interdependence, and co-evolution of individual and systemic learning. A theoretical
interdisciplinary framework, we contend, would better mirror the multiple factors and
levels entailed in the process of ageing.
ageing, complexity theory, healthcare, caregivers, technology-mediated
care
The transition towards a society where longevity is the new normal requires a change
of paradigm that entails, besides individual learning, the consideration of multiple
transformations in relationships, professional practices and attitudes, services
organisation, and policies. From the individual perspective, learning to become an older
person and adapt to new life conditions is a non-linear process emerging from daily
interactions with oneself, others, and the environment, coping with new events, accidents,
and dilemmas, taking and sharing decisions, and implementing new routines. Older
adults learning also entails letting go, finding new balances, and dealing with the Big
Questions of life (Formenti & West, 2018). The establishment of new relational balances,
identities, and good or bad outcomes in terms of health, well-being, and meaning, does
not just depend on individual strategies of adaptation (microlevel), but on systemic and
entangled factors at the meso and macrolevel.
Age-It is a national multidisciplinary research program devoted to mainstreaming
ageing in Italian society, among the oldest in the world. It created a scientific hub for new
ideas, practices, and policies, involving over 600 scholars from the biomedical, social,
and technological sciences, to address ten challenges related to health, social justice, care,
economy, work, ethics, technology, and education. Within this program, we formed an
interdisciplinary group representing education, sociology, economy, technology, and
gerontology to build a study devoted to understanding how ageing is constructed by
different actors and answered to by the local communities. We will conduct interviews
and cooperative inquiry sessions with older adults, informal and formal caregivers, and
decision makers, to map emerging needs, problems, and resources, to signal challenges,
and to suggest improvements. Fieldwork will connect qualitative and quantitative data
within a participatory framework to highlight the experience, meaning, and agency of
older people in co-evolution with their environment. We represent them as a diverse
intersectional group, not only patients or vulnerable citizens, but lifelong learners,
women and men whose backgrounds, social situations, biographies, interests, and
relationships matter in the way they evolve. We use a comprehensive critical theory of
learning in later life (Formosa, 2012; Withnall, 2009, 2011) to identify the effects of
marginalisation and disempowerment on older adults, due to structural and discursive
features within the system of care, and the informal learning processes involving family
carers, professionals, decision makers, and other relevant actors in the system.
This literature review investigates the epistemic power of complexity as a sensitising
theoretical concept that illuminates the interplay of many factors and levels, beyond the
dominant focus on individuals, their health, and the measurement of isolated variables.
We are dissatisfied with the hegemonic paradigm that neglects the heterogeneity of older
adults experiences and the role of intersectionality (gender, class, religion, education,
place of living, etc.) in the transition to new life conditions. Linear practices and policies
trivialise ageing and dispossess older adults from their rights to freedom, well-being, and
meaning. A new paradigm is needed to (re)frame the meaning of learning in later life,
that may be lost in transition with heavy effects on individuals, families, and
communities.
By referring to complexity in adult education and learning (Formenti, 2018), we
invoke a radical change of paradigm, based on co-evolution, circularity, self-organisation,
and entanglement. Our review explores whether and how complexity theories are used by
researchers to inspire new narratives, actions, and policies, and to cope with longevity as
an opportunity.
In the last decades, interest in complexity has grown fast in organisational sciences
(Axelrod & Cohen, 2000) and health policies (Braithwaite et al., 2017; Greenhalgh &
Papoutsi, 2018). Its development in adult education research is slower and marginal
(Alhadeff-Jones, 2009, Fenwick, 2003, 2016; Formenti, 2018), so we hope to fuel it by
using the lens of complex systems theory (von Foerster, 1973/1984, 1982; Morin, 2008)
to focus on learning, that is adaptation, interdependence, self-organization, and co-
evolution, as cross-cutting features of individual lives, as well as relationships, groups,
organisations, and networks. All systems, at all levels, learn by interacting with a
transforming social and material environment. This interaction is circular and produces
unpredictability. The traditional approaches to ageing, however, seek predictability and
enforce top-down strategies on individuals, groups, and communities to keep the situation
under control and to solve emerging problems by linear answers. Research on policies
has shown that the enforcement of increased regulations, guidelines, standard procedures,
performance indicators in the healthcare system fails in guaranteeing to citizens quality
of living, social justice, and even the consistent adoption of the prescribed behaviours
(Braithwaite et al., 2017). Micro transitions and adaptations that work locally happen
notwithstanding or beyond the given rules. Control fails.
Complex systems, in fact, are self-organised, layered, and entangled (Nowak &
Hubbard, 2009). At the microlevel, individual identity evolves and (new) meaning is built
whenever it is necessary to adapt and calibrate individual action to (new) emerging
conditions. Brackets are here used to stress that learning is not always about the new:
learning also is keeping a form, a habit, ones previous identity/ies, and this is especially
important in later life. In complex systems theory, learning and living are different names
for the same ongoing process. Hence, learning is biographically rooted: memories of the
past combine with present interactions and the imagination of the future, to make and
remake the individual (Formenti & West, 2018). Learners, at all ages, interpret events and
information, interact with oneself, the others, and the environment (objects, spaces,
procedures), coherently with their previous life and structure, constructing meaning and
identity (Fenwick, 2003; Formenti, 2018).
At the meso-level, however, individuals are interdependent, especially within their
proximal systems of relationships: family, workplace, friends, community/ies.
Connectedness, circularity, repetition, and a constant flux of information are the main
features of meso-systems, where every action is embedded in circuits of inter-actions.
The meso-system enforces and reinforces expected behaviours, identities, and meanings
through shared scripts, rituals, and narratives, objects and spaces, shaping lives and
identities within organised activities (regularities, rules) and normative expectations.
Complex organisations are dynamic and transform in relation to a changing environment.
Structures and patterns emerge (Braithwaite et al., 2017) from a process of self-
organisation where every part acts on the basis of tacit rules established in time by co-
existence.
Complexity, then, brings our attention beyond individual paths, to comprise the
context, which is not simply a backdrop or inactive container for human behaviour
(Formenti, 2019), but the composition of many moving parts in complex interventions
(May et al., 2016, p. 3). When we look at education and learning, any action is connected
to a context sustaining, reinforcing, or hindering it: their entanglement is another feature
of complex systems (Hynes et al., 2020). Contexts are dynamic: contextual factors that
might constitute barriers to implementation in one place may facilitate it in others (May
et al., 2016, p. 2).
These ideas pushed us to interrogate the literature on ageing, looking for clues of
complexity, and the presence of different levels in interpreting the role of adaptive
systems in the ageing society. By this, we intend to fuel a discussion on complexity in the
field of older adult education.
Inspired by Grant and Booth (2009) in their classification of literature review
methodologies, we opted for a critical review, whose aim, compared to standard
literature reviews, is to move beyond a solely descriptive account, to offer a reflexive and
critical interpretation concerning key areas (better outlined in the paragraph below).
Critical analysis is here used to sustain the construction of a conceptual model based on
mapping the literature, enriching our theoretical framing of ageing and developing new
ideas, hypotheses, and research questions around learning.
We operated our query on Scopus using the following keywords: ageing or aging, or
elderly, or older adult, complexity, health or care, communication, critic* or narrative,
system*, caregiver. These words define a semantic field that interconnects ageing, care,
and complexity with other relevant concepts. Following several attempts, we decided not
to include education or learning to keep a larger interdisciplinary focus. In this paper,
education is not our main focus per se; we are interested in everyday life and informal
learning (Golding et al. 2009), that is always present, even if tacit. We contend that older
adults learn about ageing by experiencing systemic interactions with people, things,
spaces, and organizations, that invite (or push) them to re-think their relationship with a
changing body, to make choices in relation to work, family, mobility, household, social
life, to understand relevant information about their health, to navigate new contexts, and
to calibrate their actions in relation to these manifold experiences and challenges, not least
by negotiating identity and social roles.
Figure 1 reports on the process following the PRISMA flow diagram (Moher et al.,
2009). A total of 255 items were retrieved, then double checked to remove duplicates and
papers that were not specifically addressing ageing. We further filtered our sample to
consider papers concerning people who can decide for themselves (not institutionalised,
no dementia). This led to a final sample of 62 records that were analysed guided by the
following research question:
RQ: To what extent, if at all, does this corpus of publications contribute to
conceptualising ageing as a complex learning phenomenon?
摘要:

Formenti,Laura;Cino,Davide;Loberto,FrancescaAgeingandcomplexity.Reframingolderadults'learningthroughinterdisciplinarylensesEuropeanjournalforResearchontheEducationandLearningofAdults16(2025)1,S.75-96Quellenangabe/Reference:Formenti,Laura;Cino,Davide;Loberto,Francesca:Ageingandcomplexity.Reframingold...

展开>> 收起<<
RELA_2025_1_Formenti_et_al_Ageing_and_complexity.pdf

共23页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:5.8玖币 属性:23 页 大小:762.68KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-14

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 23
客服
关注