paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding
letter on Answer Sheet 2.
Why aren't you curious about what happened?
A) “You suspended Ray Rice after our video,” a reporter from TMZ challenged National Football League Commissioner
Roger Goodell the other day. “Why didn’t you have the curiosity to go to the casino ( 赌场) yourself?” The implication of
the question is that a more curious. commissioner would have found a way to get the tape.
B) The accusation of incuriosity is one that we hear often, carrying the suggestion that there is something wrong with not
wanting to search out the truth. “I have been bothered for a long time about the curious lack of curiosity,” said a Democratic
member of the New Jersey legislature back in July, referring to an insufficiently inquiring attitude on the part of an assistant
to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie who chose not to ask hard questions about the George Washington Bridge traffic
scandal. “Isn’t the mainstream media the least bit curious about what happened?” wrote conservative writer Jennifer Rubin
earlier this year, referring to the attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya.
C) The implication, in each case, is that curiosity is a good thing, and a lack of curiosity is a problem. Are such accusations
simply efforts to score political points for one's party? Or is there something of particular value about curiosity in and of
itself?
D) The journalist Ian Leslie, in his new and enjoyable book Curious: The Desire to Know and Why Your Fatter Depends on
It, insists that the answer to that last question is ‘Yes.’ Leslie argues that curiosity is a much-overlooked human virtue,
crucial to our success, and that we are losing it.
E)We are suffering, he writes, from a “serendipity deficit.” The word “serendipity” was coined by Horace Walpole in an
1854 letter, from a tale of three princes who “were always making discoveries, by accident, of things they were not in search
of,” Leslie worries that the rise of the Internet, among other social and technological changes, has reduced our appetite for
aimless adventures. No longer have we the inclination to let ourselves wander through fields of know ledges, ready to be
surprised. Instead, we seek only the information we want.
F) Why is this a problem? Because without curiosity we will lose the spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship. We will see
unimaginative governments and dying corporations make disastrous decisions. We will lose a vital part of what has made
humanity as a whole so successful as a species.
G) Leslie presents considerable evidence for the proposition that the society as a whole is growing less curious. In the U.S.
and Europe, for example, the rise of the Internet has led to a declining consumption of news from outside the reader’s
borders .But not everything is to be blamed on technology. The decline in interest in literary fiction is also one of the causes
identified by Leslie. Reading literary fiction, he says ,make us more curious.
H)Moreover, in order to be curious, “you have to be aware of a gap in your knowledge in the first place.” Although Leslie
perhaps paints a bit broadly in contending that most of us are unaware of how much we don’t know, he’s surely right to
point out that the problem is growing: “Google can give us the powerful illusion that all questions have definite answers.”
I)Indeed, Google, for which Leslie expresses admiration, is also his frequent whipping body( 替罪羊). He quotes Google
co-founder Larry Page to the effect that the “perfect search engine” will “understand exactly what I mean and give me back
exactly what I want.” Elsewhere in the book, Leslie writes: “Google aims to save you from the thirst of curiosity